Tong Bill Xu , Viraj Nitin Govani , Saleh Kalantari
{"title":"行人导航技能与表现的年龄差异:系统回顾与元分析。","authors":"Tong Bill Xu , Viraj Nitin Govani , Saleh Kalantari","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study summarized current findings on age differences (young vs. older adults) in pedestrian navigational performance, spatial learning, and examined moderating effects of experimental environment (e.g., real-world vs. virtual environments).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two reviewers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsychInfo, and AgeLine until December 2022. Inclusion criteria: (1) empirical navigational study; (2) healthy older adults (mean age above 60); (3) age as a categorical variable; (4) peer-reviewed paper in English. Exclusion criteria: (1) overly simplified environments; (2) tasks performed with transportation; (3) small sample size (n < 10).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>5981 studies were screened, 18 were eligible with 406 total participants. Three-level meta-analysis estimated standardized mean age difference of 1.15 (95 % CI: [0.64, 1.65]) in navigational performance, and 0.97 (95 % CI: [0.81, 1.13]) in spatial learning. Study environments were found to marginally moderate age differences in navigational performance, but not in spatial learning.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Older adults have poorer navigational performance and spatial learning outcomes compared to their younger counterparts, with marginally greater performance differences in virtual environments than in the real world. Findings were limited by low number eligible studies, especially real-world experiments. Future studies should continue to test generalizability of high-fidelity VR and identify spatial design elements that can mitigate age differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55545,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Research Reviews","volume":"104 ","pages":"Article 102591"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age differences in pedestrian navigational skills and performance: A systemic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tong Bill Xu , Viraj Nitin Govani , Saleh Kalantari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study summarized current findings on age differences (young vs. older adults) in pedestrian navigational performance, spatial learning, and examined moderating effects of experimental environment (e.g., real-world vs. virtual environments).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Two reviewers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsychInfo, and AgeLine until December 2022. Inclusion criteria: (1) empirical navigational study; (2) healthy older adults (mean age above 60); (3) age as a categorical variable; (4) peer-reviewed paper in English. Exclusion criteria: (1) overly simplified environments; (2) tasks performed with transportation; (3) small sample size (n < 10).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>5981 studies were screened, 18 were eligible with 406 total participants. Three-level meta-analysis estimated standardized mean age difference of 1.15 (95 % CI: [0.64, 1.65]) in navigational performance, and 0.97 (95 % CI: [0.81, 1.13]) in spatial learning. Study environments were found to marginally moderate age differences in navigational performance, but not in spatial learning.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Older adults have poorer navigational performance and spatial learning outcomes compared to their younger counterparts, with marginally greater performance differences in virtual environments than in the real world. Findings were limited by low number eligible studies, especially real-world experiments. Future studies should continue to test generalizability of high-fidelity VR and identify spatial design elements that can mitigate age differences.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ageing Research Reviews\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ageing Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724004094\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724004094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究总结了目前在行人导航表现、空间学习方面的年龄差异(年轻人与老年人)的研究结果,并考察了实验环境(如现实世界与虚拟环境)的调节作用。方法:两位审稿人独立筛选PubMed、Web of Science、PsychInfo和AgeLine的研究,截止到2022年12月。纳入标准:(1)实证导航研究;(2)健康老年人(平均年龄60岁以上);(3)年龄作为分类变量;(4)英文同行评议论文。排除标准:(1)环境过于简化;(二)运输任务;(3)样本量小(n)结果:共筛选5981项研究,其中18项符合条件,共406名参与者。三水平荟萃分析估计,导航表现的标准化平均年龄差异为1.15 (95% CI:[0.64, 1.65]),空间学习的标准化平均年龄差异为0.97 (95% CI:[0.81, 1.13])。研究发现,学习环境对导航表现的年龄差异有轻微调节作用,但对空间学习没有影响。讨论:与年轻人相比,老年人的导航能力和空间学习成绩较差,在虚拟环境中的表现差异略大于现实世界。研究结果受限于数量较少的合格研究,特别是现实世界的实验。未来的研究应继续测试高保真虚拟现实的普遍性,并确定可以缓解年龄差异的空间设计元素。
Age differences in pedestrian navigational skills and performance: A systemic review and meta-analysis
Objectives
This study summarized current findings on age differences (young vs. older adults) in pedestrian navigational performance, spatial learning, and examined moderating effects of experimental environment (e.g., real-world vs. virtual environments).
Methods
Two reviewers independently screened studies from PubMed, Web of Science, PsychInfo, and AgeLine until December 2022. Inclusion criteria: (1) empirical navigational study; (2) healthy older adults (mean age above 60); (3) age as a categorical variable; (4) peer-reviewed paper in English. Exclusion criteria: (1) overly simplified environments; (2) tasks performed with transportation; (3) small sample size (n < 10).
Results
5981 studies were screened, 18 were eligible with 406 total participants. Three-level meta-analysis estimated standardized mean age difference of 1.15 (95 % CI: [0.64, 1.65]) in navigational performance, and 0.97 (95 % CI: [0.81, 1.13]) in spatial learning. Study environments were found to marginally moderate age differences in navigational performance, but not in spatial learning.
Discussion
Older adults have poorer navigational performance and spatial learning outcomes compared to their younger counterparts, with marginally greater performance differences in virtual environments than in the real world. Findings were limited by low number eligible studies, especially real-world experiments. Future studies should continue to test generalizability of high-fidelity VR and identify spatial design elements that can mitigate age differences.
期刊介绍:
With the rise in average human life expectancy, the impact of ageing and age-related diseases on our society has become increasingly significant. Ageing research is now a focal point for numerous laboratories, encompassing leaders in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and behavior. Ageing Research Reviews (ARR) serves as a cornerstone in this field, addressing emerging trends.
ARR aims to fill a substantial gap by providing critical reviews and viewpoints on evolving discoveries concerning the mechanisms of ageing and age-related diseases. The rapid progress in understanding the mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival is unveiling new insights into the regulation of ageing. From telomerase to stem cells, and from energy to oxyradical metabolism, we are witnessing an exciting era in the multidisciplinary field of ageing research.
The journal explores the cellular and molecular foundations of interventions that extend lifespan, such as caloric restriction. It identifies the underpinnings of manipulations that extend lifespan, shedding light on novel approaches for preventing age-related diseases. ARR publishes articles on focused topics selected from the expansive field of ageing research, with a particular emphasis on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the aging process. This includes age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders. The journal also covers applications of basic ageing research to lifespan extension and disease prevention, offering a comprehensive platform for advancing our understanding of this critical field.