应对方式和社会支持在受他人赌博影响的人的伤害和痛苦经历中的作用。

IF 3.7 2区医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108236

Catherine Tulloch , Matthew Browne , Matthew Rockloff , Nerilee Hing , Margo Hilbrecht

{"title":"应对方式和社会支持在受他人赌博影响的人的伤害和痛苦经历中的作用。","authors":"Catherine Tulloch , Matthew Browne , Matthew Rockloff , Nerilee Hing , Margo Hilbrecht","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gambling-related harms can negatively impact the health and wellbeing of those around the person who gambles (affected others, AOs). The stress–strain-coping-support (SSCS) model proposes that the type of coping strategies AOs use, and the availability of social support, can effectively reduce some of these negative consequences. The current study aimed to explore the assumptions in the SSCS model by examining the role of coping styles and social support on the experience of harm and psychological distress in AOs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A community sample (N = 1,131) of AOs completed the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), Gambling Harm Scale for Affected Others (GHS-AO-20; harm), Significant Other Closeness Scale, Kessler-6 (K6; psychological distress), Brief Coping Questionnaire (coping styles) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (social support). Data were analysed using hierarchical multiple regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The use of maladaptive coping styles was positively associated with harm and psychological distress. Social support was significantly negatively correlated with harm and distress. When all predictors were included in regression analyses, the only significant predictors of harm and distress were being exposed to a more severe gambling problem, being closer to the person with the gambling problem, greater use of maladaptive coping styles, and lower levels of social support. Some interaction effects were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Some commonly used coping behaviours may inadvertently exacerbate harm and distress, while social support appears to be protective against negative health impacts. Education, treatment, and support to AOs could provide options that address these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 108236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The roles of coping style and social support in the experience of harm and distress among people affected by another person’s gambling\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Tulloch , Matthew Browne , Matthew Rockloff , Nerilee Hing , Margo Hilbrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Gambling-related harms can negatively impact the health and wellbeing of those around the person who gambles (affected others, AOs). The stress–strain-coping-support (SSCS) model proposes that the type of coping strategies AOs use, and the availability of social support, can effectively reduce some of these negative consequences. The current study aimed to explore the assumptions in the SSCS model by examining the role of coping styles and social support on the experience of harm and psychological distress in AOs.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A community sample (N = 1,131) of AOs completed the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), Gambling Harm Scale for Affected Others (GHS-AO-20; harm), Significant Other Closeness Scale, Kessler-6 (K6; psychological distress), Brief Coping Questionnaire (coping styles) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (social support). Data were analysed using hierarchical multiple regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The use of maladaptive coping styles was positively associated with harm and psychological distress. Social support was significantly negatively correlated with harm and distress. When all predictors were included in regression analyses, the only significant predictors of harm and distress were being exposed to a more severe gambling problem, being closer to the person with the gambling problem, greater use of maladaptive coping styles, and lower levels of social support. Some interaction effects were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Some commonly used coping behaviours may inadvertently exacerbate harm and distress, while social support appears to be protective against negative health impacts. Education, treatment, and support to AOs could provide options that address these findings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"volume\":\"162 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addictive behaviors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324002855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460324002855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：与赌博相关的危害会对赌徒周围的人（受影响的其他人，ao）的健康和福祉产生负面影响。应力-应变-应对-支持（SSCS）模型表明，AOs使用的应对策略类型和社会支持的可得性可以有效地减少这些负面后果。本研究旨在通过考察应对方式和社会支持对青少年伤害体验和心理困扰的影响，探讨ssc模型的假设。方法：抽取社区样本（N = 1131），填写问题赌博严重程度指数（PGSI）、受影响他人赌博危害量表(GHS-AO-20；显著他人亲密度量表，Kessler-6 (K6；心理困扰)、简易应对问卷（应对方式）和感知社会支持多维量表（社会支持）。数据分析采用层次多元回归。结果：不良应对方式的使用与伤害和心理困扰呈正相关。社会支持与伤害和痛苦显著负相关。当所有的预测因素都被纳入回归分析时，伤害和痛苦的唯一显著预测因素是暴露于更严重的赌博问题，与赌博问题的人更接近，更多地使用适应不良的应对方式，以及较低的社会支持水平。确定了一些相互作用效应。结论：一些常用的应对行为可能会无意中加剧伤害和痛苦，而社会支持似乎可以防止负面健康影响。教育、治疗和支持AOs可以提供解决这些发现的选择。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The roles of coping style and social support in the experience of harm and distress among people affected by another person’s gambling

Background

Gambling-related harms can negatively impact the health and wellbeing of those around the person who gambles (affected others, AOs). The stress–strain-coping-support (SSCS) model proposes that the type of coping strategies AOs use, and the availability of social support, can effectively reduce some of these negative consequences. The current study aimed to explore the assumptions in the SSCS model by examining the role of coping styles and social support on the experience of harm and psychological distress in AOs.

Method

A community sample (N = 1,131) of AOs completed the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), Gambling Harm Scale for Affected Others (GHS-AO-20; harm), Significant Other Closeness Scale, Kessler-6 (K6; psychological distress), Brief Coping Questionnaire (coping styles) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (social support). Data were analysed using hierarchical multiple regression.

Results

The use of maladaptive coping styles was positively associated with harm and psychological distress. Social support was significantly negatively correlated with harm and distress. When all predictors were included in regression analyses, the only significant predictors of harm and distress were being exposed to a more severe gambling problem, being closer to the person with the gambling problem, greater use of maladaptive coping styles, and lower levels of social support. Some interaction effects were identified.

Conclusions

Some commonly used coping behaviours may inadvertently exacerbate harm and distress, while social support appears to be protective against negative health impacts. Education, treatment, and support to AOs could provide options that address these findings.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用

CiteScore

8.40

自引率

4.50%

发文量

283

审稿时长

46 days

期刊介绍： Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.