不同根系制度下高产农业牧草氮素利用效率的研究

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
N. P. K. Muhandiram, M. W. Humphreys, R. Fychan, J. W. Davies, M. B. Scott, J. Harper, A. Thomas, H. Powell, R. Sanderson, C. L. Marley
{"title":"不同根系制度下高产农业牧草氮素利用效率的研究","authors":"N. P. K. Muhandiram,&nbsp;M. W. Humphreys,&nbsp;R. Fychan,&nbsp;J. W. Davies,&nbsp;M. B. Scott,&nbsp;J. Harper,&nbsp;A. Thomas,&nbsp;H. Powell,&nbsp;R. Sanderson,&nbsp;C. L. Marley","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For forage production to be efficient and environmentally sustainable, the extent and timing of nitrogen fertiliser applications should match the uptake and growth capabilities of a grass crop. A two-year field experiment, comprising four diverse grass cultivars, was conducted to assess the impact of two contrasting N-application rates on forage and root biomass (RB) production and nitrogen-use-efficiencies (NUEs). Replicated field plots of perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and two <i>Festulolium</i> (ryegrass × fescue hybrid) cultivars were compared at Low N (LN) 178 and High N (HN) 356 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> over 2 years. HN applications increased dry matter yield (DMY) in Year 1 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) but not in Year 2. Ryegrass outyielded all in Year 1 but in Year 2, fescue had the highest DMY at HN (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), but cultivars did not differ in yield at LN. <i>Festulolium</i> yields were consistently intermediate. Root biomass at LN in Yr1 was highest in the <i>Festulolium</i> (<i>Lolium perenne</i> × <i>Festuca arundinacea var glaucescens</i>) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). For all grasses, and in both years, mean RB and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE) were higher under LN, than HN. Nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE) was similar in all grasses in Year 1, irrespective of N treatment, but in Year 2, excepting tall fescue, was greater in grasses grown under LN. Increasing RB correlated (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) with improved NUE and NutE, but no association was evident for NupE. Grass cultivars differed in their response to nitrogen applications. Whilst relative forage production of ryegrass and fescue contrasted over the 2 years, forage yields of <i>Festulolium</i> cultivars were more consistent. In conclusion, HN application depressed NUE by productive grass cultivars and correlations between RB and NUEs may indicate opportunities to help tailor grass cultivar/fertiliser combinations and achieve sustainable forage and root production.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoping Opportunities for Nitrogen Use Efficiency Among Productive Agricultural Forage Grasses With Diverse Rooting Systems\",\"authors\":\"N. P. K. Muhandiram,&nbsp;M. W. Humphreys,&nbsp;R. Fychan,&nbsp;J. W. Davies,&nbsp;M. B. Scott,&nbsp;J. Harper,&nbsp;A. Thomas,&nbsp;H. Powell,&nbsp;R. Sanderson,&nbsp;C. L. Marley\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fes3.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>For forage production to be efficient and environmentally sustainable, the extent and timing of nitrogen fertiliser applications should match the uptake and growth capabilities of a grass crop. A two-year field experiment, comprising four diverse grass cultivars, was conducted to assess the impact of two contrasting N-application rates on forage and root biomass (RB) production and nitrogen-use-efficiencies (NUEs). Replicated field plots of perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and two <i>Festulolium</i> (ryegrass × fescue hybrid) cultivars were compared at Low N (LN) 178 and High N (HN) 356 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> over 2 years. HN applications increased dry matter yield (DMY) in Year 1 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) but not in Year 2. Ryegrass outyielded all in Year 1 but in Year 2, fescue had the highest DMY at HN (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), but cultivars did not differ in yield at LN. <i>Festulolium</i> yields were consistently intermediate. Root biomass at LN in Yr1 was highest in the <i>Festulolium</i> (<i>Lolium perenne</i> × <i>Festuca arundinacea var glaucescens</i>) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). For all grasses, and in both years, mean RB and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE) were higher under LN, than HN. Nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE) was similar in all grasses in Year 1, irrespective of N treatment, but in Year 2, excepting tall fescue, was greater in grasses grown under LN. Increasing RB correlated (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) with improved NUE and NutE, but no association was evident for NupE. Grass cultivars differed in their response to nitrogen applications. Whilst relative forage production of ryegrass and fescue contrasted over the 2 years, forage yields of <i>Festulolium</i> cultivars were more consistent. In conclusion, HN application depressed NUE by productive grass cultivars and correlations between RB and NUEs may indicate opportunities to help tailor grass cultivar/fertiliser combinations and achieve sustainable forage and root production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Energy Security\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70023\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Energy Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了使饲料生产高效和环境可持续,氮肥施用的程度和时间应与牧草的吸收和生长能力相匹配。通过为期2年的田间试验,研究了不同施氮量对4个不同品种牧草和根系生物量(RB)产量及氮素利用效率的影响。在低氮(LN) 178和高氮(HN) 356 kg ha - 1条件下,对多年生黑麦草、高羊茅和2个Festulolium(黑麦草与羊茅杂交)品种进行了2年的重复大田试验。施用氮肥提高了第1年的干物质产量(DMY) (p < 0.05),但在第2年没有。黑麦草在第1年产量均高于其他品种,但在第2年,羊茅在低温条件下的DMY最高(p < 0.05),但在低温条件下不同品种的产量没有差异。Festulolium的产量一直处于中等水平。1年LN根生物量以羊茅属(Lolium perenne × Festuca arundinacea var glaucescens)最高(p < 0.05)。在两年中,所有牧草的平均RB、氮素利用效率(NUE)和氮素利用效率(NutE)在低LN条件下均高于低HN条件。在第1年,所有草的氮素吸收效率(NupE)基本相同,但在第2年,除高羊茅外,LN处理下的草的氮素吸收效率更高。RB的增加与NUE和NutE的改善相关(p < 0.05),但与NupE无明显相关性。不同牧草品种对施氮量的响应不同。黑麦草和羊茅的相对产草量在2年内比较,而羊茅品种的产草量比较一致。综上所述,施氮降低了高产草品种的氮肥利用效率,且氮肥与氮肥利用效率之间存在相关性,这可能有助于调整牧草/肥料组合,实现可持续的牧草和根系生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Scoping Opportunities for Nitrogen Use Efficiency Among Productive Agricultural Forage Grasses With Diverse Rooting Systems

Scoping Opportunities for Nitrogen Use Efficiency Among Productive Agricultural Forage Grasses With Diverse Rooting Systems

For forage production to be efficient and environmentally sustainable, the extent and timing of nitrogen fertiliser applications should match the uptake and growth capabilities of a grass crop. A two-year field experiment, comprising four diverse grass cultivars, was conducted to assess the impact of two contrasting N-application rates on forage and root biomass (RB) production and nitrogen-use-efficiencies (NUEs). Replicated field plots of perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and two Festulolium (ryegrass × fescue hybrid) cultivars were compared at Low N (LN) 178 and High N (HN) 356 kg ha−1 over 2 years. HN applications increased dry matter yield (DMY) in Year 1 (p < 0.05) but not in Year 2. Ryegrass outyielded all in Year 1 but in Year 2, fescue had the highest DMY at HN (p < 0.05), but cultivars did not differ in yield at LN. Festulolium yields were consistently intermediate. Root biomass at LN in Yr1 was highest in the Festulolium (Lolium perenne × Festuca arundinacea var glaucescens) (p < 0.05). For all grasses, and in both years, mean RB and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and nitrogen utilisation efficiency (NutE) were higher under LN, than HN. Nitrogen uptake efficiency (NupE) was similar in all grasses in Year 1, irrespective of N treatment, but in Year 2, excepting tall fescue, was greater in grasses grown under LN. Increasing RB correlated (p < 0.05) with improved NUE and NutE, but no association was evident for NupE. Grass cultivars differed in their response to nitrogen applications. Whilst relative forage production of ryegrass and fescue contrasted over the 2 years, forage yields of Festulolium cultivars were more consistent. In conclusion, HN application depressed NUE by productive grass cultivars and correlations between RB and NUEs may indicate opportunities to help tailor grass cultivar/fertiliser combinations and achieve sustainable forage and root production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food and Energy Security
Food and Energy Security Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor. Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights. Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge. Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include: • Agronomy • Biotechnological Approaches • Breeding & Genetics • Climate Change • Quality and Composition • Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks • Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry • Functional Genomics • Molecular Biology • Pest and Disease Management • Post Harvest Biology • Soil Science • Systems Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信