语音还是短信?医生媒介选择对在线医疗社区患者体验的作用

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Anfei Xia, Sandun C. Perera, Muhammad U. Ahmed, Jianying Tang, Jian-Jun Wang
{"title":"语音还是短信?医生媒介选择对在线医疗社区患者体验的作用","authors":"Anfei Xia,&nbsp;Sandun C. Perera,&nbsp;Muhammad U. Ahmed,&nbsp;Jianying Tang,&nbsp;Jian-Jun Wang","doi":"10.1111/deci.12654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Online medical communities (OMCs) are a type of online healthcare, in which physician-patient interaction can be comprised of a variety of media options such as pictures, text, and voice. These media formats are often used to create a personalized patient experience in AI-driven conversational healthcare platforms. To explore how physician media usage affects patient experience, we propose a counterfactual causal inference model using AI-driven data mining methods on 131,083 online consultation records and 7,666,111 messages sent by physicians from one of the largest OMCs in China. Our study reveals the negative impact of physician use of voice on patient experience, compared to text. Drawing upon social support theory, we identify the mechanism by which physician media usage for voice produces a negative effect. The findings indicate that the negative effect of physicians' voice-media usage occurs mainly in low-risk disease conditions, by weakening the role of professional and emotional support. In contrast, in high-risk disease conditions, voice-media usage strengthens the role of professional and emotional support in improving the patient's experience. Our study is one of the first to focus on the social support attributes of the different media formats used in OMCs. We use advanced AI text-analysis algorithms to extract features related to social support in physician-patient conversations, and thus contribute to the use of AI in feature extraction for research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"55 6","pages":"620-638"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voice or text? The role of physician media choice on patient experience in online medical communities\",\"authors\":\"Anfei Xia,&nbsp;Sandun C. Perera,&nbsp;Muhammad U. Ahmed,&nbsp;Jianying Tang,&nbsp;Jian-Jun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/deci.12654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Online medical communities (OMCs) are a type of online healthcare, in which physician-patient interaction can be comprised of a variety of media options such as pictures, text, and voice. These media formats are often used to create a personalized patient experience in AI-driven conversational healthcare platforms. To explore how physician media usage affects patient experience, we propose a counterfactual causal inference model using AI-driven data mining methods on 131,083 online consultation records and 7,666,111 messages sent by physicians from one of the largest OMCs in China. Our study reveals the negative impact of physician use of voice on patient experience, compared to text. Drawing upon social support theory, we identify the mechanism by which physician media usage for voice produces a negative effect. The findings indicate that the negative effect of physicians' voice-media usage occurs mainly in low-risk disease conditions, by weakening the role of professional and emotional support. In contrast, in high-risk disease conditions, voice-media usage strengthens the role of professional and emotional support in improving the patient's experience. Our study is one of the first to focus on the social support attributes of the different media formats used in OMCs. We use advanced AI text-analysis algorithms to extract features related to social support in physician-patient conversations, and thus contribute to the use of AI in feature extraction for research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"55 6\",\"pages\":\"620-638\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12654\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在线医疗社区(omc)是一种在线医疗保健,其中医患互动可以由各种媒体选项(如图片、文本和语音)组成。这些媒体格式通常用于在人工智能驱动的会话式医疗保健平台中创建个性化的患者体验。为了探索医生媒体使用如何影响患者体验,我们使用人工智能驱动的数据挖掘方法,对中国最大的一家医疗保健公司的医生发送的131,083条在线咨询记录和7,666,111条消息提出了一个反事实因果推理模型。我们的研究揭示了与文本相比,医生使用语音对患者体验的负面影响。根据社会支持理论,我们确定了医生媒体使用声音产生负面影响的机制。研究结果表明,医生使用语音媒体的负面影响主要发生在低风险疾病条件下,通过削弱专业和情感支持的作用。相反,在高风险疾病条件下,语音媒体的使用加强了专业和情感支持在改善患者体验方面的作用。我们的研究是第一个关注网络营销中使用的不同媒体格式的社会支持属性的研究之一。我们使用先进的人工智能文本分析算法来提取医患对话中与社会支持相关的特征,从而有助于人工智能在特征提取中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Voice or text? The role of physician media choice on patient experience in online medical communities

Online medical communities (OMCs) are a type of online healthcare, in which physician-patient interaction can be comprised of a variety of media options such as pictures, text, and voice. These media formats are often used to create a personalized patient experience in AI-driven conversational healthcare platforms. To explore how physician media usage affects patient experience, we propose a counterfactual causal inference model using AI-driven data mining methods on 131,083 online consultation records and 7,666,111 messages sent by physicians from one of the largest OMCs in China. Our study reveals the negative impact of physician use of voice on patient experience, compared to text. Drawing upon social support theory, we identify the mechanism by which physician media usage for voice produces a negative effect. The findings indicate that the negative effect of physicians' voice-media usage occurs mainly in low-risk disease conditions, by weakening the role of professional and emotional support. In contrast, in high-risk disease conditions, voice-media usage strengthens the role of professional and emotional support in improving the patient's experience. Our study is one of the first to focus on the social support attributes of the different media formats used in OMCs. We use advanced AI text-analysis algorithms to extract features related to social support in physician-patient conversations, and thus contribute to the use of AI in feature extraction for research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信