{"title":"omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸对精神病症状严重程度的治疗效果:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alison T Rossier, Brian Hallahan","doi":"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have shown promise as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, the overall consensus about their efficacy across studies is still lacking and findings to date are inconclusive. No clinical trials or systematic reviews have yet examined if omega-3 PUFAs are associated with differential levels of efficacy at various stages of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic bibliographic search of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of omega-3 PUFAs as a monotherapy or adjunctive therapy versus a control group in adults and children at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis, experiencing a first-episode psychosis (FEP), or diagnosed with an established psychotic disorder was conducted. Participants' clinical symptoms were evaluated using total and subscale scores on validated psychometric scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs treatment was found in comparison with that of placebo (<i>G</i> = -0.26, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.08). Treatment of omega-3 PUFAs did not prove any significant improvement in psychopathology in UHR (<i>G</i> = -0.09, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.63), FEP (<i>G</i> = -1.20, 95% CI -5.63 to 3.22, <i>p</i> = 0.59), or schizophrenia patients (<i>G</i> = -0.17, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings confirm previous evidence that disputes the original reported findings of the beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs in schizophrenia. Furthermore, accumulative evidence of the use of omega-3 as a preventive treatment option in UHR is not supported, suggesting that the need for future studies in this line of research should not be promoted.</p>","PeriodicalId":12155,"journal":{"name":"European Psychiatry","volume":"67 1","pages":"e88"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The therapeutic effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on symptom severity of psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alison T Rossier, Brian Hallahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have shown promise as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, the overall consensus about their efficacy across studies is still lacking and findings to date are inconclusive. No clinical trials or systematic reviews have yet examined if omega-3 PUFAs are associated with differential levels of efficacy at various stages of psychosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic bibliographic search of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of omega-3 PUFAs as a monotherapy or adjunctive therapy versus a control group in adults and children at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis, experiencing a first-episode psychosis (FEP), or diagnosed with an established psychotic disorder was conducted. Participants' clinical symptoms were evaluated using total and subscale scores on validated psychometric scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs treatment was found in comparison with that of placebo (<i>G</i> = -0.26, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.08). Treatment of omega-3 PUFAs did not prove any significant improvement in psychopathology in UHR (<i>G</i> = -0.09, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.63), FEP (<i>G</i> = -1.20, 95% CI -5.63 to 3.22, <i>p</i> = 0.59), or schizophrenia patients (<i>G</i> = -0.17, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings confirm previous evidence that disputes the original reported findings of the beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs in schizophrenia. Furthermore, accumulative evidence of the use of omega-3 as a preventive treatment option in UHR is not supported, suggesting that the need for future studies in this line of research should not be promoted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"e88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733620/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1804\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1804","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)作为精神分裂症和其他精神疾病的辅助治疗已经显示出希望,但关于其疗效的总体共识在研究中仍然缺乏,迄今为止的发现也不确定。目前还没有临床试验或系统评价研究omega-3 PUFAs是否与不同精神病阶段的不同疗效水平有关。方法:对随机双盲安慰剂对照试验(rct)进行系统的文献检索,研究omega-3 PUFAs作为单一疗法或辅助疗法与对照组在精神病超高风险(UHR)、经历首发精神病(FEP)或确诊为精神病的成人和儿童中进行的效果。在有效的心理测量量表上使用总分和亚量表评分来评估参与者的临床症状。结果:与安慰剂相比,未发现omega-3 PUFAs治疗的有益效果(G = -0.26, 95% CI -0.55至0.03,p = 0.08)。omega-3 PUFAs治疗未证明对UHR (G = -0.09, 95% CI -0.45至0.27,p = 0.63)、FEP (G = -1.20, 95% CI -5.63至3.22,p = 0.59)或精神分裂症患者(G = -0.17, 95% CI -0.38至-0.03,p = 0.10)的精神病理有任何显著改善。结论:这些发现证实了先前的证据,这些证据与最初报道的omega-3 PUFAs对精神分裂症有益的发现存在争议。此外,在UHR中使用omega-3作为一种预防性治疗选择的累积证据并不支持,这表明不应该促进这方面研究的未来研究。
The therapeutic effect of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on symptom severity of psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: While omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have shown promise as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, the overall consensus about their efficacy across studies is still lacking and findings to date are inconclusive. No clinical trials or systematic reviews have yet examined if omega-3 PUFAs are associated with differential levels of efficacy at various stages of psychosis.
Method: A systematic bibliographic search of randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effect of omega-3 PUFAs as a monotherapy or adjunctive therapy versus a control group in adults and children at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis, experiencing a first-episode psychosis (FEP), or diagnosed with an established psychotic disorder was conducted. Participants' clinical symptoms were evaluated using total and subscale scores on validated psychometric scales.
Results: No beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs treatment was found in comparison with that of placebo (G = -0.26, 95% CI -0.55 to 0.03, p = 0.08). Treatment of omega-3 PUFAs did not prove any significant improvement in psychopathology in UHR (G = -0.09, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.27, p = 0.63), FEP (G = -1.20, 95% CI -5.63 to 3.22, p = 0.59), or schizophrenia patients (G = -0.17, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.03, p = 0.10).
Conclusion: These findings confirm previous evidence that disputes the original reported findings of the beneficial effect of omega-3 PUFAs in schizophrenia. Furthermore, accumulative evidence of the use of omega-3 as a preventive treatment option in UHR is not supported, suggesting that the need for future studies in this line of research should not be promoted.
期刊介绍:
European Psychiatry, the official journal of the European Psychiatric Association, is dedicated to sharing cutting-edge research, policy updates, and fostering dialogue among clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates in the fields of psychiatry, mental health, behavioral science, and neuroscience. This peer-reviewed, Open Access journal strives to publish the latest advancements across various mental health issues, including diagnostic and treatment breakthroughs, as well as advancements in understanding the biological foundations of mental, behavioral, and cognitive functions in both clinical and general population studies.