机器学习能否根据经典的神经心理学测试和一项新的财务能力测试表现,帮助我们对老年痴呆症患者进行分类?

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Vaitsa Giannouli, Stylianos Kampakis
{"title":"机器学习能否根据经典的神经心理学测试和一项新的财务能力测试表现,帮助我们对老年痴呆症患者进行分类?","authors":"Vaitsa Giannouli, Stylianos Kampakis","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Predicting the diagnosis of an older adult solely based on their financial capacity performance or other neuropsychological test performance is still an open question. The aim of this study is to highlight which tests are of importance in diagnostic protocols by using recent advancements in machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this reason, a neuropsychological battery was administered in 543 older Greek patients already diagnosed with different types of neurocognitive disorders along with a test specifically measuring financial capacity, that is, Legal Capacity for Property Law Transactions Assessment Scale (LCPLTAS). The battery was analysed using a random forest algorithm. The objective was to predict whether an older person suffers from dementia. The algorithm's performance was tested through cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Machine learning was applied for the first time in data analysis regarding financial capacity and three factors-tests were revealed as the best predictors: two subscales from the LCPLTAS measuring 'financial decision making' and 'cash transactions', and the widely used MMSE which measures general cognition. The algorithm demonstrated good performance as measured by the F1-score, which is a measure of the harmonic mean of precision and recall. This evaluation metric in binary and multi-class classification integrates precision and recall into a single metric to gain a better understanding of model performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reveal the importance of focusing on these scales and tests in neuropsychological assessment protocols. Future research may clarify in other cultural settings if the same variables are of importance.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can machine learning assist us in the classification of older patients suffering from dementia based on classic neuropsychological tests and a new financial capacity test performance?\",\"authors\":\"Vaitsa Giannouli, Stylianos Kampakis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnp.12409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Predicting the diagnosis of an older adult solely based on their financial capacity performance or other neuropsychological test performance is still an open question. The aim of this study is to highlight which tests are of importance in diagnostic protocols by using recent advancements in machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this reason, a neuropsychological battery was administered in 543 older Greek patients already diagnosed with different types of neurocognitive disorders along with a test specifically measuring financial capacity, that is, Legal Capacity for Property Law Transactions Assessment Scale (LCPLTAS). The battery was analysed using a random forest algorithm. The objective was to predict whether an older person suffers from dementia. The algorithm's performance was tested through cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Machine learning was applied for the first time in data analysis regarding financial capacity and three factors-tests were revealed as the best predictors: two subscales from the LCPLTAS measuring 'financial decision making' and 'cash transactions', and the widely used MMSE which measures general cognition. The algorithm demonstrated good performance as measured by the F1-score, which is a measure of the harmonic mean of precision and recall. This evaluation metric in binary and multi-class classification integrates precision and recall into a single metric to gain a better understanding of model performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reveal the importance of focusing on these scales and tests in neuropsychological assessment protocols. Future research may clarify in other cultural settings if the same variables are of importance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12409\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:仅根据老年人的财务能力表现或其他神经心理测试表现来预测老年人的诊断仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。本研究的目的是通过使用机器学习的最新进展来突出哪些测试在诊断协议中是重要的。方法:为此,研究人员对543名已经被诊断为不同类型神经认知障碍的希腊老年患者进行了神经心理学测试,并进行了一项专门衡量财务能力的测试,即财产法交易法律能力评估量表(LCPLTAS)。使用随机森林算法对电池进行分析。目的是预测老年人是否患有痴呆症。通过交叉验证验证了算法的性能。​该算法表现出良好的性能,通过f1分数来衡量,f1分数是精度和召回率的调和平均值。这种二元多类分类的评价指标将精度和召回率集成到一个单一的指标中,从而更好地理解模型的性能。结论:这些发现揭示了在神经心理学评估方案中关注这些量表和测试的重要性。未来的研究可能会澄清在其他文化背景下,如果相同的变量是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can machine learning assist us in the classification of older patients suffering from dementia based on classic neuropsychological tests and a new financial capacity test performance?

Aims: Predicting the diagnosis of an older adult solely based on their financial capacity performance or other neuropsychological test performance is still an open question. The aim of this study is to highlight which tests are of importance in diagnostic protocols by using recent advancements in machine learning.

Methods: For this reason, a neuropsychological battery was administered in 543 older Greek patients already diagnosed with different types of neurocognitive disorders along with a test specifically measuring financial capacity, that is, Legal Capacity for Property Law Transactions Assessment Scale (LCPLTAS). The battery was analysed using a random forest algorithm. The objective was to predict whether an older person suffers from dementia. The algorithm's performance was tested through cross-validation.

Results: Machine learning was applied for the first time in data analysis regarding financial capacity and three factors-tests were revealed as the best predictors: two subscales from the LCPLTAS measuring 'financial decision making' and 'cash transactions', and the widely used MMSE which measures general cognition. The algorithm demonstrated good performance as measured by the F1-score, which is a measure of the harmonic mean of precision and recall. This evaluation metric in binary and multi-class classification integrates precision and recall into a single metric to gain a better understanding of model performance.

Conclusions: These findings reveal the importance of focusing on these scales and tests in neuropsychological assessment protocols. Future research may clarify in other cultural settings if the same variables are of importance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuropsychology
Journal of Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including: • clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups • behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes • cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging • multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science The following types of paper are invited: • papers reporting original empirical investigations • theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data • review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications • brief reports and comments • case reports • fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors) • special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信