强的松龙与普瑞巴林治疗下肢手术后硬脊膜穿刺后头痛镇痛效果的比较研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek Salem, Mahmoud M Elnady, Sherif A Alagamy, Sherif M Mowafy
{"title":"强的松龙与普瑞巴林治疗下肢手术后硬脊膜穿刺后头痛镇痛效果的比较研究。","authors":"Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek Salem, Mahmoud M Elnady, Sherif A Alagamy, Sherif M Mowafy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major challenging complication and may be a cause of morbidity after spinal anesthesia. Currently there is no definitive management for PDPH, so the search for effective treatment continues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to investigate the analgesic effectiveness of oral prednisolone vs oral pregabalin for managing PDPH subsequent to spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective controlled double-blind randomized study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic University Hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 63 patients who had lower limb surgeries and suffered PDPH after spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups. Group C patients received conservative treatment and to maintain blinding, a tablet of vitamins was given to them twice per day for 3 days; Group P patients received conservative treatment and oral prednisolone 20 mg once daily plus one tablet of vitamins (in order to ensure blinding) for 3 days; Group G patients received oral pregabalin 150 mg twice daily for 3 days in addition to conservative treatment. The primary outcomes we measured were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and modified Lybecker score. The secondary outcomes we measured were the total dose of rescue analgesia, the need for an epidural blood patch (EBP), and adverse effects from the study drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing the intensity of headaches assessed through both the VAS and the modified Lybecker score, no statistically significant disparities were observed in relation to baseline measurements. While after starting treatment by 12 hours and 24 hours, the headache intensity was statistically significantly lower in Group G compared to Group P and Group C, but there was no significant difference between Group C and Group P at 12 hours. The headache intensity was statistically significantly higher in Group C compared to Group P and Group G, but there was no significant difference between Group P and Group G at 48 hours and 72 hours. Ketorolac consumption was statistically significantly higher in group C than the other groups. However, it was statistically significantly lower in group G than group P. Only 2 patients in group C were indicated for EBP while no patients in either Groups P or G required an EBP.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our study's limitations include the paucity of literature studying prednisolone and pregabalin use in PDPH, our study's small sample size, and the lack of sufficient studies for comparing results may limit the generalization of our findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both oral prednisolone and pregabalin were effective in reducing PDPH severity; oral pregabalin is superior to prednisolone.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"27 10","pages":"E1045-E1054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study Between the Analgesic Effect of Prednisolone and Pregabalin in Managing Post Dural Puncture Headache After Lower Limb Surgeries.\",\"authors\":\"Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek Salem, Mahmoud M Elnady, Sherif A Alagamy, Sherif M Mowafy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major challenging complication and may be a cause of morbidity after spinal anesthesia. Currently there is no definitive management for PDPH, so the search for effective treatment continues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to investigate the analgesic effectiveness of oral prednisolone vs oral pregabalin for managing PDPH subsequent to spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective controlled double-blind randomized study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Academic University Hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 63 patients who had lower limb surgeries and suffered PDPH after spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups. Group C patients received conservative treatment and to maintain blinding, a tablet of vitamins was given to them twice per day for 3 days; Group P patients received conservative treatment and oral prednisolone 20 mg once daily plus one tablet of vitamins (in order to ensure blinding) for 3 days; Group G patients received oral pregabalin 150 mg twice daily for 3 days in addition to conservative treatment. The primary outcomes we measured were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and modified Lybecker score. The secondary outcomes we measured were the total dose of rescue analgesia, the need for an epidural blood patch (EBP), and adverse effects from the study drugs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing the intensity of headaches assessed through both the VAS and the modified Lybecker score, no statistically significant disparities were observed in relation to baseline measurements. While after starting treatment by 12 hours and 24 hours, the headache intensity was statistically significantly lower in Group G compared to Group P and Group C, but there was no significant difference between Group C and Group P at 12 hours. The headache intensity was statistically significantly higher in Group C compared to Group P and Group G, but there was no significant difference between Group P and Group G at 48 hours and 72 hours. Ketorolac consumption was statistically significantly higher in group C than the other groups. However, it was statistically significantly lower in group G than group P. Only 2 patients in group C were indicated for EBP while no patients in either Groups P or G required an EBP.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Our study's limitations include the paucity of literature studying prednisolone and pregabalin use in PDPH, our study's small sample size, and the lack of sufficient studies for comparing results may limit the generalization of our findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both oral prednisolone and pregabalin were effective in reducing PDPH severity; oral pregabalin is superior to prednisolone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"E1045-E1054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:硬膜穿刺后头痛(PDPH)是一种具有挑战性的主要并发症,可能是脊髓麻醉后发病的原因之一。目前,PDPH 尚无明确的治疗方法,因此,寻找有效治疗方法的工作仍在继续:研究设计:前瞻性双盲随机对照研究:研究设计:前瞻性双盲随机对照研究:共有 63 名下肢手术患者在脊髓麻醉后出现 PDPH,他们被随机分配到 3 组中的一组。C组患者接受保守治疗,为保持盲目性,每天给他们服用两次维生素片,共服用3天;P组患者接受保守治疗,同时口服泼尼松龙20毫克,每天一次,外加一片维生素片(为确保盲目性),共服用3天;G组患者除接受保守治疗外,还口服普瑞巴林150毫克,每天两次,共服用3天。我们测量的主要结果是视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和改良Lybecker评分。我们测量的次要结果是抢救性镇痛的总剂量、硬膜外血贴(EBP)的需要量以及研究药物的不良反应:结果:通过 VAS 和改良的 Lybecker 评分对头痛强度进行评估比较后发现,与基线测量值相比,两者之间没有明显的统计学差异。开始治疗 12 小时和 24 小时后,G 组的头痛强度在统计学上明显低于 P 组和 C 组,但在 12 小时时,C 组和 P 组之间没有明显差异。据统计,C 组的头痛强度明显高于 P 组和 G 组,但在 48 小时和 72 小时时,P 组和 G 组之间没有明显差异。据统计,C 组的酮咯酸用量明显高于其他组。只有 C 组的 2 名患者需要 EBP,而 P 组和 G 组均无患者需要 EBP:我们的研究存在局限性,包括研究泼尼松龙和普瑞巴林在 PDPH 中应用的文献较少,我们的研究样本量较小,而且缺乏足够的研究来比较结果,这可能会限制我们研究结果的推广:结论:口服泼尼松龙和普瑞巴林都能有效减轻 PDPH 的严重程度;口服普瑞巴林优于泼尼松龙。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study Between the Analgesic Effect of Prednisolone and Pregabalin in Managing Post Dural Puncture Headache After Lower Limb Surgeries.

Background: Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major challenging complication and may be a cause of morbidity after spinal anesthesia. Currently there is no definitive management for PDPH, so the search for effective treatment continues.

Objectives: Our aim was to investigate the analgesic effectiveness of oral prednisolone vs oral pregabalin for managing PDPH subsequent to spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgeries.

Study design: A prospective controlled double-blind randomized study.

Setting: Academic University Hospitals.

Methods: A total of 63 patients who had lower limb surgeries and suffered PDPH after spinal anesthesia were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups. Group C patients received conservative treatment and to maintain blinding, a tablet of vitamins was given to them twice per day for 3 days; Group P patients received conservative treatment and oral prednisolone 20 mg once daily plus one tablet of vitamins (in order to ensure blinding) for 3 days; Group G patients received oral pregabalin 150 mg twice daily for 3 days in addition to conservative treatment. The primary outcomes we measured were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and modified Lybecker score. The secondary outcomes we measured were the total dose of rescue analgesia, the need for an epidural blood patch (EBP), and adverse effects from the study drugs.

Results: When comparing the intensity of headaches assessed through both the VAS and the modified Lybecker score, no statistically significant disparities were observed in relation to baseline measurements. While after starting treatment by 12 hours and 24 hours, the headache intensity was statistically significantly lower in Group G compared to Group P and Group C, but there was no significant difference between Group C and Group P at 12 hours. The headache intensity was statistically significantly higher in Group C compared to Group P and Group G, but there was no significant difference between Group P and Group G at 48 hours and 72 hours. Ketorolac consumption was statistically significantly higher in group C than the other groups. However, it was statistically significantly lower in group G than group P. Only 2 patients in group C were indicated for EBP while no patients in either Groups P or G required an EBP.

Limitations: Our study's limitations include the paucity of literature studying prednisolone and pregabalin use in PDPH, our study's small sample size, and the lack of sufficient studies for comparing results may limit the generalization of our findings.

Conclusion: Both oral prednisolone and pregabalin were effective in reducing PDPH severity; oral pregabalin is superior to prednisolone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信