干细胞移植期间表达性帮助写作的效果:随机对照试验。

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Christine Rini, George Luta, Deniz Ozisik, Scott D Rowley, Annette L Stanton, Heiddis Valdimarsdottir, Jane Austin, Betina Yanez, Kristi D Graves
{"title":"干细胞移植期间表达性帮助写作的效果:随机对照试验。","authors":"Christine Rini, George Luta, Deniz Ozisik, Scott D Rowley, Annette L Stanton, Heiddis Valdimarsdottir, Jane Austin, Betina Yanez, Kristi D Graves","doi":"10.1037/hea0001445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Most cancer patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant report elevated symptoms and reduced health-related quality of life during peritransplant. These concerns can become persistent. A prior randomized controlled trial showed that expressive helping-a low-burden, brief intervention combining expressive writing with a novel peer support writing exercise-reduced psychological distress and physical symptoms in long-term transplant survivors with moderate/high persistent symptoms. The Writing for Insight, Strength, and Ease trial evaluated the use of expressive helping during peritransplant, when symptoms peak and early intervention could prevent the development of persistent symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Three hundred sixty-six adult blood cancer patients (44.3% female, 74.6% White, 13.4% Black, 11.5% Hispanic/Latinx) scheduled for allogeneic (33.9%) or autologous (66.1%) transplant were randomized to complete either expressive helping or a neutral writing task in four writing sessions beginning pretransplant and ending 4 weeks posthospital discharge. Symptom severity (primary outcome), distress (depressive symptoms, generalized and cancer-specific anxiety), health-related quality of life, and fatigue were measured in multiple assessments from prerandomization to 12 months postintervention. Primary endpoints at 3 and 12 months postintervention estimated short- and long-term intervention effects. Moderation analyses explored subgroup differences in intervention efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed models with repeated measures analyses revealed no statistically or clinically significant intervention effects on primary or secondary outcomes. Moderation analyses did not identify subgroups of participants who benefitted from the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings do not support use of expressive helping during peritransplant. We recommend that survivors with persistent symptoms complete expressive helping at least 9 months posttransplant, consistent with evidence from a prior trial. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of expressive helping writing during stem cell transplant: Randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Rini, George Luta, Deniz Ozisik, Scott D Rowley, Annette L Stanton, Heiddis Valdimarsdottir, Jane Austin, Betina Yanez, Kristi D Graves\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/hea0001445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Most cancer patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant report elevated symptoms and reduced health-related quality of life during peritransplant. These concerns can become persistent. A prior randomized controlled trial showed that expressive helping-a low-burden, brief intervention combining expressive writing with a novel peer support writing exercise-reduced psychological distress and physical symptoms in long-term transplant survivors with moderate/high persistent symptoms. The Writing for Insight, Strength, and Ease trial evaluated the use of expressive helping during peritransplant, when symptoms peak and early intervention could prevent the development of persistent symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Three hundred sixty-six adult blood cancer patients (44.3% female, 74.6% White, 13.4% Black, 11.5% Hispanic/Latinx) scheduled for allogeneic (33.9%) or autologous (66.1%) transplant were randomized to complete either expressive helping or a neutral writing task in four writing sessions beginning pretransplant and ending 4 weeks posthospital discharge. Symptom severity (primary outcome), distress (depressive symptoms, generalized and cancer-specific anxiety), health-related quality of life, and fatigue were measured in multiple assessments from prerandomization to 12 months postintervention. Primary endpoints at 3 and 12 months postintervention estimated short- and long-term intervention effects. Moderation analyses explored subgroup differences in intervention efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed models with repeated measures analyses revealed no statistically or clinically significant intervention effects on primary or secondary outcomes. Moderation analyses did not identify subgroups of participants who benefitted from the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings do not support use of expressive helping during peritransplant. We recommend that survivors with persistent symptoms complete expressive helping at least 9 months posttransplant, consistent with evidence from a prior trial. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001445\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001445","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大多数接受造血干细胞移植的癌症患者报告称,在移植期间症状加重,与健康相关的生活质量下降。这些问题可能会持续存在。之前的一项随机对照试验表明,表达性帮助--一种低负担、简短的干预措施,将表达性写作与新颖的同伴支持写作练习相结合--可减少具有中度/高度持续症状的长期移植幸存者的心理困扰和身体症状。为洞察力、力量和轻松而写作 "试验评估了表达性帮助在围移植期的使用情况,此时是症状的高峰期,早期干预可防止持续症状的发展:366名成年血癌患者(44.3%为女性,74.6%为白人,13.4%为黑人,11.5%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔)计划接受异体移植(33.9%)或自体移植(66.1%),他们被随机分配在四次写作过程中完成表达性帮助或中性写作任务,写作过程从移植前开始,到出院后4周结束。从随机前到干预后 12 个月的多次评估中测量了症状严重程度(主要结果)、痛苦(抑郁症状、广泛性焦虑和癌症特异性焦虑)、健康相关生活质量和疲劳。干预后 3 个月和 12 个月的主要终点估计了短期和长期干预效果。调节分析探讨了干预效果的亚组差异:结果:重复测量的混合模型分析表明,干预对主要或次要结果没有显著的统计学或临床效果。调节分析没有发现从干预中受益的亚组参与者:结论:研究结果不支持在围移植期使用表达性帮助。我们建议有持续症状的幸存者在移植后至少 9 个月完成表达性帮助,这与之前一项试验的证据一致。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of expressive helping writing during stem cell transplant: Randomized controlled trial.

Objective: Most cancer patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant report elevated symptoms and reduced health-related quality of life during peritransplant. These concerns can become persistent. A prior randomized controlled trial showed that expressive helping-a low-burden, brief intervention combining expressive writing with a novel peer support writing exercise-reduced psychological distress and physical symptoms in long-term transplant survivors with moderate/high persistent symptoms. The Writing for Insight, Strength, and Ease trial evaluated the use of expressive helping during peritransplant, when symptoms peak and early intervention could prevent the development of persistent symptoms.

Method: Three hundred sixty-six adult blood cancer patients (44.3% female, 74.6% White, 13.4% Black, 11.5% Hispanic/Latinx) scheduled for allogeneic (33.9%) or autologous (66.1%) transplant were randomized to complete either expressive helping or a neutral writing task in four writing sessions beginning pretransplant and ending 4 weeks posthospital discharge. Symptom severity (primary outcome), distress (depressive symptoms, generalized and cancer-specific anxiety), health-related quality of life, and fatigue were measured in multiple assessments from prerandomization to 12 months postintervention. Primary endpoints at 3 and 12 months postintervention estimated short- and long-term intervention effects. Moderation analyses explored subgroup differences in intervention efficacy.

Results: Mixed models with repeated measures analyses revealed no statistically or clinically significant intervention effects on primary or secondary outcomes. Moderation analyses did not identify subgroups of participants who benefitted from the intervention.

Conclusion: Findings do not support use of expressive helping during peritransplant. We recommend that survivors with persistent symptoms complete expressive helping at least 9 months posttransplant, consistent with evidence from a prior trial. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信