回避/限制性食物摄入障碍认知行为治疗结果的预测因素。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Lilian P Palmer, P Evelyna Kambanis, Casey M Stern, Setareh M Rossman, Christopher J Mancuso, Alexandrea M Andrea, Helen Burton-Murray, Kendra R Becker, Lauren Breithaupt, Cathryn Freid, Elisa Asanza, Elizabeth A Lawson, Kamryn T Eddy, Jennifer J Thomas
{"title":"回避/限制性食物摄入障碍认知行为治疗结果的预测因素。","authors":"Lilian P Palmer, P Evelyna Kambanis, Casey M Stern, Setareh M Rossman, Christopher J Mancuso, Alexandrea M Andrea, Helen Burton-Murray, Kendra R Becker, Lauren Breithaupt, Cathryn Freid, Elisa Asanza, Elizabeth A Lawson, Kamryn T Eddy, Jennifer J Thomas","doi":"10.1002/eat.24345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive-behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID; CBT-AR) shows promise in improving clinical outcomes in children/adolescents and adults. We aimed to identify predictors of outcomes in CBT-AR. We hypothesized that younger age, non-underweight status, and presence of the fear of aversive consequences profile of ARFID would predict greater likelihood of remission post-treatment, and that presence of the lack of interest in eating/food and sensory sensitivity profiles would predict greater likelihood of persistence post-treatment. We included sex as an exploratory predictor.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals (N = 94, ages 10-55 years) were offered 20-30 outpatient sessions of CBT-AR. We collected clinical and demographic data at pre-treatment, and remission status at post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent with our hypothesis, presence (versus absence) of the fear profile predicted an almost three-fold increased likelihood of remission. Presence of the sensory profile, lack of interest profile, age, weight status, and sex were not predictors of ARFID outcome.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The fear of aversive consequences profile of ARFID may be more amenable to treatment with CBT-AR. This is the first study to identify predictors of treatment outcome following CBT-AR. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and examine moderators.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Outcome in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Lilian P Palmer, P Evelyna Kambanis, Casey M Stern, Setareh M Rossman, Christopher J Mancuso, Alexandrea M Andrea, Helen Burton-Murray, Kendra R Becker, Lauren Breithaupt, Cathryn Freid, Elisa Asanza, Elizabeth A Lawson, Kamryn T Eddy, Jennifer J Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive-behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID; CBT-AR) shows promise in improving clinical outcomes in children/adolescents and adults. We aimed to identify predictors of outcomes in CBT-AR. We hypothesized that younger age, non-underweight status, and presence of the fear of aversive consequences profile of ARFID would predict greater likelihood of remission post-treatment, and that presence of the lack of interest in eating/food and sensory sensitivity profiles would predict greater likelihood of persistence post-treatment. We included sex as an exploratory predictor.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Individuals (N = 94, ages 10-55 years) were offered 20-30 outpatient sessions of CBT-AR. We collected clinical and demographic data at pre-treatment, and remission status at post-treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consistent with our hypothesis, presence (versus absence) of the fear profile predicted an almost three-fold increased likelihood of remission. Presence of the sensory profile, lack of interest profile, age, weight status, and sex were not predictors of ARFID outcome.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The fear of aversive consequences profile of ARFID may be more amenable to treatment with CBT-AR. This is the first study to identify predictors of treatment outcome following CBT-AR. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and examine moderators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24345\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:认知行为疗法治疗回避/限制性食物摄入障碍;CBT-AR在改善儿童/青少年和成人的临床结果方面显示出希望。我们的目的是确定CBT-AR结果的预测因素。我们假设,年龄较小、非体重过轻、ARFID中存在对不良后果的恐惧会预测治疗后缓解的可能性更大,而对饮食/食物缺乏兴趣和感觉敏感性的存在会预测治疗后持续存在的可能性更大。我们把性作为一个探索性的预测因素。方法:接受20-30次门诊CBT-AR治疗的个体(N = 94,年龄10-55岁)。我们收集了治疗前的临床和人口统计数据,以及治疗后的缓解状态。结果:与我们的假设一致,存在(相对于不存在)恐惧概况预测缓解的可能性增加近三倍。感觉谱的存在、兴趣谱的缺乏、年龄、体重状况和性别不是ARFID结果的预测因子。讨论:ARFID对不良后果的恐惧可能更适合CBT-AR治疗。这是第一个确定CBT-AR治疗结果预测因素的研究。需要随机对照试验来证实这些发现并检查调节因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of Outcome in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder.

Objective: Cognitive-behavioral therapy for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID; CBT-AR) shows promise in improving clinical outcomes in children/adolescents and adults. We aimed to identify predictors of outcomes in CBT-AR. We hypothesized that younger age, non-underweight status, and presence of the fear of aversive consequences profile of ARFID would predict greater likelihood of remission post-treatment, and that presence of the lack of interest in eating/food and sensory sensitivity profiles would predict greater likelihood of persistence post-treatment. We included sex as an exploratory predictor.

Method: Individuals (N = 94, ages 10-55 years) were offered 20-30 outpatient sessions of CBT-AR. We collected clinical and demographic data at pre-treatment, and remission status at post-treatment.

Results: Consistent with our hypothesis, presence (versus absence) of the fear profile predicted an almost three-fold increased likelihood of remission. Presence of the sensory profile, lack of interest profile, age, weight status, and sex were not predictors of ARFID outcome.

Discussion: The fear of aversive consequences profile of ARFID may be more amenable to treatment with CBT-AR. This is the first study to identify predictors of treatment outcome following CBT-AR. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and examine moderators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信