阿根廷人准备好接受植物肉类替代品了吗?关于消费意识和消费意愿的案例研究。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Trinidad Soteras, Natalia Szerman, Manuela Merayo, Sergio Ramón Vaudagna, Gabriela Inés Denoya, Luis Guerrero, Mara Virginia Galmarini
{"title":"阿根廷人准备好接受植物肉类替代品了吗?关于消费意识和消费意愿的案例研究。","authors":"Trinidad Soteras, Natalia Szerman, Manuela Merayo, Sergio Ramón Vaudagna, Gabriela Inés Denoya, Luis Guerrero, Mara Virginia Galmarini","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Meat alternatives' popularity is increasing worldwide. Nevertheless, the attitudes and motivations underpinning their adoption still evolve and may differ by region. In Argentina, where meat consumption per capita is among the highest globally, the market for plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) is just beginning to develop. Few reports attempt to explain the behavior of the Argentinian population regarding these products. This study explored the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of meat analogues and hybrid products through a national online survey (N = 2339). Also, barriers and drivers to their consumption as well as the target segments were identified. Participants were classified as omnivores 73.8%, flexitarians 19.5%, vegetarians 6%, and vegans 0.7%. Despite the significant lack of awareness about PBMAs, there is a strong willingness to adopt them, with females, younger respondents, and those with lower incomes more open to these options. The main drivers for consumption were health concerns, animal welfare, and environmental awareness. Familiarity was a key factor influencing the adoption, as evidenced by the openness of well-informed omnivores. Lack of available options represented the main limitation for consumption and distrust regarding their origin and sensory appeal were the primary reasons for rejection. This study reveals a potential market for PBMAs in Argentina, highlighting that guaranteeing nutritional and sensory quality is crucial. Educating consumers is also essential for their widespread acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107817"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Argentinians ready for plant-based meat alternatives? A case study on awareness and willingness for consumption.\",\"authors\":\"Trinidad Soteras, Natalia Szerman, Manuela Merayo, Sergio Ramón Vaudagna, Gabriela Inés Denoya, Luis Guerrero, Mara Virginia Galmarini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Meat alternatives' popularity is increasing worldwide. Nevertheless, the attitudes and motivations underpinning their adoption still evolve and may differ by region. In Argentina, where meat consumption per capita is among the highest globally, the market for plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) is just beginning to develop. Few reports attempt to explain the behavior of the Argentinian population regarding these products. This study explored the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of meat analogues and hybrid products through a national online survey (N = 2339). Also, barriers and drivers to their consumption as well as the target segments were identified. Participants were classified as omnivores 73.8%, flexitarians 19.5%, vegetarians 6%, and vegans 0.7%. Despite the significant lack of awareness about PBMAs, there is a strong willingness to adopt them, with females, younger respondents, and those with lower incomes more open to these options. The main drivers for consumption were health concerns, animal welfare, and environmental awareness. Familiarity was a key factor influencing the adoption, as evidenced by the openness of well-informed omnivores. Lack of available options represented the main limitation for consumption and distrust regarding their origin and sensory appeal were the primary reasons for rejection. This study reveals a potential market for PBMAs in Argentina, highlighting that guaranteeing nutritional and sensory quality is crucial. Educating consumers is also essential for their widespread acceptance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107817\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107817\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肉类替代品在全世界越来越受欢迎。然而,人们采用肉类替代品的态度和动机仍在不断变化,而且可能因地区而异。阿根廷是全球人均肉类消费量最高的国家之一,其植物性肉类替代品(PBMAs)市场刚刚开始发展。很少有报告试图解释阿根廷人对这些产品的行为。本研究通过一项全国性在线调查(N = 2339),探讨了人们对肉类类似物和混合产品的了解、态度和看法。此外,还确定了消费这些产品的障碍和驱动因素以及目标人群。参与者中73.8%为杂食主义者,19.5%为灵活主义者,6%为素食主义者,0.7%为纯素主义者。尽管受访者对 PBMAs 的认识严重不足,但他们有强烈的意愿采用这些食品,其中女性、年轻受访者和收入较低的受访者对这些选择持更开放的态度。消费的主要驱动因素是健康问题、动物福利和环保意识。熟知是影响采用的一个关键因素,见多识广的杂食者的开放态度就证明了这一点。缺乏可供选择的食品是消费的主要限制因素,对其来源和感官吸引力的不信任是拒绝的主要原因。这项研究揭示了 PBMA 在阿根廷的潜在市场,强调保证营养和感官质量至关重要。对消费者进行教育对其被广泛接受也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Argentinians ready for plant-based meat alternatives? A case study on awareness and willingness for consumption.

Meat alternatives' popularity is increasing worldwide. Nevertheless, the attitudes and motivations underpinning their adoption still evolve and may differ by region. In Argentina, where meat consumption per capita is among the highest globally, the market for plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) is just beginning to develop. Few reports attempt to explain the behavior of the Argentinian population regarding these products. This study explored the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of meat analogues and hybrid products through a national online survey (N = 2339). Also, barriers and drivers to their consumption as well as the target segments were identified. Participants were classified as omnivores 73.8%, flexitarians 19.5%, vegetarians 6%, and vegans 0.7%. Despite the significant lack of awareness about PBMAs, there is a strong willingness to adopt them, with females, younger respondents, and those with lower incomes more open to these options. The main drivers for consumption were health concerns, animal welfare, and environmental awareness. Familiarity was a key factor influencing the adoption, as evidenced by the openness of well-informed omnivores. Lack of available options represented the main limitation for consumption and distrust regarding their origin and sensory appeal were the primary reasons for rejection. This study reveals a potential market for PBMAs in Argentina, highlighting that guaranteeing nutritional and sensory quality is crucial. Educating consumers is also essential for their widespread acceptance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信