Iain B McInnes, Philipp Sewerin, Mohamed Sharaf, Michela Efficace, Frédéric Lavie, Miriam Zimmermann, Laura C Coates
{"title":"无论基线特征如何,活动性银屑病关节炎患者对 Guselkumab 的持续应答以及对 TNF 抑制剂的应答不足:COSMOS 3b 期临床试验结果。","authors":"Iain B McInnes, Philipp Sewerin, Mohamed Sharaf, Michela Efficace, Frédéric Lavie, Miriam Zimmermann, Laura C Coates","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To prospectively evaluate the effect of guselkumab through 48 weeks across various clinical outcomes in subgroups of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR) from the phase 3b COSMOS trial. Subgroups were defined by baseline demographics, disease characteristics and prior/ongoing therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with active PsA (tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) both ≥3) and TNFi-IR were randomised 2:1 to receive guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, week 4, then every 8 weeks through week 44 or to placebo with cross-over to guselkumab 100 mg at week 16 (early escape) or week 24 (planned). Guselkumab effect on joints (American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70, enthesitis, dactylitis), skin (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90/100, Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1), patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index) and composite outcome measures (PsA Disease Activity Score low disease activity, minimal disease activity) were evaluated by baseline patient age, sex, body mass index, SJC, TJC, PsA duration, %body surface area, C reactive protein, pain Visual Analogue Scale, number of prior TNFi and discontinuation reason, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug status. Results are descriptive only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar between guselkumab (n=189) and placebo (n=96) groups. The benefit of guselkumab over placebo in achieving ACR 20 (primary endpoint; 50% vs 28%) and ACR 50 (23% vs 8%) response at week 24 was observed within all subgroups. Furthermore, response rates in the guselkumab group increased between week 24 and week 48 within almost all subgroups. Similar response patterns at week 24 and through week 48 were observed across various clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guselkumab every 8 weeks led to consistent improvements through week 24 in joint, skin, PRO and composite outcomes versus placebo across diverse baseline-defined subgroups of TNFi-IR patients with PsA. Response rates increased or were durable through week 48 within most subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647317/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustained response to guselkumab regardless of baseline characteristics in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to TNF inhibitors: results from the phase 3b COSMOS clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Iain B McInnes, Philipp Sewerin, Mohamed Sharaf, Michela Efficace, Frédéric Lavie, Miriam Zimmermann, Laura C Coates\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To prospectively evaluate the effect of guselkumab through 48 weeks across various clinical outcomes in subgroups of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR) from the phase 3b COSMOS trial. Subgroups were defined by baseline demographics, disease characteristics and prior/ongoing therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with active PsA (tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) both ≥3) and TNFi-IR were randomised 2:1 to receive guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, week 4, then every 8 weeks through week 44 or to placebo with cross-over to guselkumab 100 mg at week 16 (early escape) or week 24 (planned). Guselkumab effect on joints (American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70, enthesitis, dactylitis), skin (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90/100, Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1), patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index) and composite outcome measures (PsA Disease Activity Score low disease activity, minimal disease activity) were evaluated by baseline patient age, sex, body mass index, SJC, TJC, PsA duration, %body surface area, C reactive protein, pain Visual Analogue Scale, number of prior TNFi and discontinuation reason, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug status. Results are descriptive only.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar between guselkumab (n=189) and placebo (n=96) groups. The benefit of guselkumab over placebo in achieving ACR 20 (primary endpoint; 50% vs 28%) and ACR 50 (23% vs 8%) response at week 24 was observed within all subgroups. Furthermore, response rates in the guselkumab group increased between week 24 and week 48 within almost all subgroups. Similar response patterns at week 24 and through week 48 were observed across various clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guselkumab every 8 weeks led to consistent improvements through week 24 in joint, skin, PRO and composite outcomes versus placebo across diverse baseline-defined subgroups of TNFi-IR patients with PsA. Response rates increased or were durable through week 48 within most subgroups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RMD Open\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647317/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RMD Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004494\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的对3b期COSMOS试验中对肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi-IR)反应不充分的银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者亚组进行48周的前瞻性评估。亚组由基线人口统计学、疾病特征和先前/正在进行的疗法定义:活动性PsA(关节触痛计数(TJC)和关节肿胀计数(SJC)均≥3)和TNFi-IR患者按2:1比例随机分配,在第0周、第4周接受100毫克的古谢库单抗治疗,然后每8周治疗一次,直至第44周;或接受安慰剂治疗,并在第16周(早期逃脱)或第24周(计划中)交叉接受100毫克的古谢库单抗治疗。Guselkumab对关节(美国风湿病学会(ACR)20/50/70、腱鞘炎、趾关节炎)、皮肤(银屑病面积和严重程度指数90/100、研究者总体评估0/1)、患者报告结局(PROs)(慢性疾病治疗功能评估-疲劳、健康评估问卷-残疾指数)和综合结局指标(PsA疾病活动度评分-疾病活动度低、对基线患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、SJC、TJC、PsA 病程、体表面积百分比、C 反应蛋白、疼痛视觉模拟量表、既往使用 TNFi 的次数和停药原因以及常规合成改善病情抗风湿药物的状况进行了评估。结果仅为描述性:结果:古舍库单抗组(189 人)和安慰剂组(96 人)的基线特征相似。在所有亚组别中均观察到,在第24周达到ACR 20(主要终点;50% vs 28%)和ACR 50(23% vs 8%)应答方面,古舍库单抗比安慰剂更有优势。此外,在第24周至第48周期间,几乎在所有亚组别中,guselkumab组的应答率都有所上升。各种临床结果在第24周和第48周均观察到类似的应答模式:每8周一次的古舍库单抗与安慰剂相比,在不同基线定义的TNFi-IR PsA患者亚组中,关节、皮肤、PRO和综合结果在第24周均有持续改善。在大多数亚组别中,应答率在第48周时有所上升或持续。
Sustained response to guselkumab regardless of baseline characteristics in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and inadequate response to TNF inhibitors: results from the phase 3b COSMOS clinical trial.
Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the effect of guselkumab through 48 weeks across various clinical outcomes in subgroups of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR) from the phase 3b COSMOS trial. Subgroups were defined by baseline demographics, disease characteristics and prior/ongoing therapies.
Methods: Patients with active PsA (tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) both ≥3) and TNFi-IR were randomised 2:1 to receive guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, week 4, then every 8 weeks through week 44 or to placebo with cross-over to guselkumab 100 mg at week 16 (early escape) or week 24 (planned). Guselkumab effect on joints (American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70, enthesitis, dactylitis), skin (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 90/100, Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1), patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index) and composite outcome measures (PsA Disease Activity Score low disease activity, minimal disease activity) were evaluated by baseline patient age, sex, body mass index, SJC, TJC, PsA duration, %body surface area, C reactive protein, pain Visual Analogue Scale, number of prior TNFi and discontinuation reason, and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug status. Results are descriptive only.
Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between guselkumab (n=189) and placebo (n=96) groups. The benefit of guselkumab over placebo in achieving ACR 20 (primary endpoint; 50% vs 28%) and ACR 50 (23% vs 8%) response at week 24 was observed within all subgroups. Furthermore, response rates in the guselkumab group increased between week 24 and week 48 within almost all subgroups. Similar response patterns at week 24 and through week 48 were observed across various clinical outcomes.
Conclusions: Guselkumab every 8 weeks led to consistent improvements through week 24 in joint, skin, PRO and composite outcomes versus placebo across diverse baseline-defined subgroups of TNFi-IR patients with PsA. Response rates increased or were durable through week 48 within most subgroups.
期刊介绍:
RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.