{"title":"图雷特综合征基底神经节体积的神经影像学评估:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hanife Ertürk, Emre Ertürk, Evrim Aktepe, Lütfiye Bikem Süzen","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2024.2439800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An increasing number of studies indicate that anatomical, physiological, and histological differences in the basal ganglia(BG) lie in the etiology of Tourette Syndrome(TS). However, the fact that there are very few studies on the anatomy of the BG in TS, small sample sizes, and unclear information as a consequence of these studies' contradictory findings is a significant gap in the scientific literature. The current systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to examine the differences in BG volumes between TS and controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The protocol was registered with PROSPERO(CRD42023445845). Pertaining studies were ascertained via a search of the published literature in academic databases. The software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis was utilised for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>527 articles were reached, and after the exclusion stages, 8 articles remained for the current systematic review and 7 articles for the quantitative meta-analysis. After evaluating each component of the BG individually, no difference was found between the BG volumes of controls and TS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The failure to discover the predicted volume difference can be explained by either the severity of the tic or the exclusion of comorbidity. The difference in BG volume is likely related to TS cases with more severe tics and severe comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"256-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroimaging assessment of basal ganglia volumes in Tourette Syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hanife Ertürk, Emre Ertürk, Evrim Aktepe, Lütfiye Bikem Süzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13546805.2024.2439800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An increasing number of studies indicate that anatomical, physiological, and histological differences in the basal ganglia(BG) lie in the etiology of Tourette Syndrome(TS). However, the fact that there are very few studies on the anatomy of the BG in TS, small sample sizes, and unclear information as a consequence of these studies' contradictory findings is a significant gap in the scientific literature. The current systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to examine the differences in BG volumes between TS and controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The protocol was registered with PROSPERO(CRD42023445845). Pertaining studies were ascertained via a search of the published literature in academic databases. The software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis was utilised for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>527 articles were reached, and after the exclusion stages, 8 articles remained for the current systematic review and 7 articles for the quantitative meta-analysis. After evaluating each component of the BG individually, no difference was found between the BG volumes of controls and TS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The failure to discover the predicted volume difference can be explained by either the severity of the tic or the exclusion of comorbidity. The difference in BG volume is likely related to TS cases with more severe tics and severe comorbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"256-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2024.2439800\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2024.2439800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neuroimaging assessment of basal ganglia volumes in Tourette Syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Introduction: An increasing number of studies indicate that anatomical, physiological, and histological differences in the basal ganglia(BG) lie in the etiology of Tourette Syndrome(TS). However, the fact that there are very few studies on the anatomy of the BG in TS, small sample sizes, and unclear information as a consequence of these studies' contradictory findings is a significant gap in the scientific literature. The current systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to examine the differences in BG volumes between TS and controls.
Method: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO(CRD42023445845). Pertaining studies were ascertained via a search of the published literature in academic databases. The software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis was utilised for statistical analysis.
Results: 527 articles were reached, and after the exclusion stages, 8 articles remained for the current systematic review and 7 articles for the quantitative meta-analysis. After evaluating each component of the BG individually, no difference was found between the BG volumes of controls and TS.
Conclusion: The failure to discover the predicted volume difference can be explained by either the severity of the tic or the exclusion of comorbidity. The difference in BG volume is likely related to TS cases with more severe tics and severe comorbidities.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered.
There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.