对儿童难治性/治疗性/顽固性便秘的定义:一项基于问卷的横断面在线调查。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Morris Gordon, Wathsala Hathagoda, Shaman Rajindrajith, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Mansour Abdulshafea, Carlos Velasco, Merit Tabbers, Marc A Benninga
{"title":"对儿童难治性/治疗性/顽固性便秘的定义:一项基于问卷的横断面在线调查。","authors":"Morris Gordon, Wathsala Hathagoda, Shaman Rajindrajith, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Mansour Abdulshafea, Carlos Velasco, Merit Tabbers, Marc A Benninga","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Rome criteria define childhood functional constipation but do not address refractory constipation. Attempts to define refractory constipation lack consensus. The interchangeable use of 'refractory' and 'intractable' or 'therapy-resistant' constipation and lack of understanding of the therapeutic ceilings before this diagnosis complicates the definition.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To conduct an online cross-sectional study among medical professionals and researchers across a range of countries, to propose a consensus definition, terminology and duration of medically unresponsive constipation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An expert-designed questionnaire was disseminated via Google Forms in a two-stage study over 2 months targeting paediatric gastroenterology professionals globally and Latin American clinicians with a translated version. The questionnaire had seven critical questions containing details needed to define medically unresponsive constipation. The study protocol was approved by the ethics review panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey involved 1079 participants: 87 from various countries in the first phase and 992 from Latin America in the second. There were 619 (57.3%) general paediatricians and 462 (43 %) paediatric gastroenterologists. The preferred term to indicate poorly responding constipation was 'therapy-resistant constipation' (47.8%), followed by 'refractory constipation' (43.6%). The majority of respondents (92.9%) agreed on considering a time frame for defining refractory constipation, with 37.7% suggesting 2-3 months. 467 (43.2%) recommended including failure despite maximum laxative therapy with two agents should be considered as previous therapy failure. Compliance with therapy was deemed essential for successful treatment by 91.1%, assessed through detailed history-taking (47.4%) or medical/pharmacy records (29.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the professional views collected in this study, we propose the term 'therapy-resistant constipation' and it can be defined as constipation that is not responding to a maximum dose of at least two laxatives of different classes for a minimum of 3 months with good compliance in a secondary or tertiary care facility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a definition of refractory/therapy-resistant/intractable constipation in children: a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based, online survey.\",\"authors\":\"Morris Gordon, Wathsala Hathagoda, Shaman Rajindrajith, Vassiliki Sinopoulou, Mansour Abdulshafea, Carlos Velasco, Merit Tabbers, Marc A Benninga\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Rome criteria define childhood functional constipation but do not address refractory constipation. Attempts to define refractory constipation lack consensus. The interchangeable use of 'refractory' and 'intractable' or 'therapy-resistant' constipation and lack of understanding of the therapeutic ceilings before this diagnosis complicates the definition.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To conduct an online cross-sectional study among medical professionals and researchers across a range of countries, to propose a consensus definition, terminology and duration of medically unresponsive constipation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An expert-designed questionnaire was disseminated via Google Forms in a two-stage study over 2 months targeting paediatric gastroenterology professionals globally and Latin American clinicians with a translated version. The questionnaire had seven critical questions containing details needed to define medically unresponsive constipation. The study protocol was approved by the ethics review panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey involved 1079 participants: 87 from various countries in the first phase and 992 from Latin America in the second. There were 619 (57.3%) general paediatricians and 462 (43 %) paediatric gastroenterologists. The preferred term to indicate poorly responding constipation was 'therapy-resistant constipation' (47.8%), followed by 'refractory constipation' (43.6%). The majority of respondents (92.9%) agreed on considering a time frame for defining refractory constipation, with 37.7% suggesting 2-3 months. 467 (43.2%) recommended including failure despite maximum laxative therapy with two agents should be considered as previous therapy failure. Compliance with therapy was deemed essential for successful treatment by 91.1%, assessed through detailed history-taking (47.4%) or medical/pharmacy records (29.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the professional views collected in this study, we propose the term 'therapy-resistant constipation' and it can be defined as constipation that is not responding to a maximum dose of at least two laxatives of different classes for a minimum of 3 months with good compliance in a secondary or tertiary care facility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647291/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003063\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:罗马标准定义儿童功能性便秘,但不解决难治性便秘。试图定义难治性便秘缺乏共识。“难治性”和“顽固性”或“治疗抵抗性”便秘的交替使用,以及在诊断前缺乏对治疗上限的了解,使定义复杂化。目的:在一系列国家的医学专业人员和研究人员中进行一项在线横断面研究,以提出医学上无反应性便秘的共识定义、术语和持续时间。方法:在为期2个月的两阶段研究中,通过谷歌表格分发专家设计的问卷,目标是全球儿科胃肠病学专业人员和拉丁美洲临床医生,并提供翻译版本。调查问卷有七个关键问题,其中包含定义医学上无反应性便秘所需的细节。研究方案经伦理审查小组批准。结果:该调查涉及1079名参与者:第一阶段来自不同国家的87人,第二阶段来自拉丁美洲的992人。共有619名(57.3%)普通儿科医生和462名(43%)儿科胃肠病学医生。反应不良便秘的首选术语是“治疗抵抗性便秘”(47.8%),其次是“难治性便秘”(43.6%)。大多数受访者(92.9%)同意考虑一个时间框架来定义难治性便秘,37.7%的人建议2-3个月。467例(43.2%)推荐包括两种药物的最大泻药治疗失败应视为既往治疗失败。通过详细的病史记录(47.4%)或医疗/药房记录(29.4%)评估,91.1%的人认为治疗依从性是成功治疗的关键。结论:基于本研究中收集的专业观点,我们提出了“治疗抵抗性便秘”这一术语,它可以定义为在二级或三级医疗机构中服用至少两种不同类别的最大剂量泻药至少3个月且依从性良好的便秘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a definition of refractory/therapy-resistant/intractable constipation in children: a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based, online survey.

Background: The Rome criteria define childhood functional constipation but do not address refractory constipation. Attempts to define refractory constipation lack consensus. The interchangeable use of 'refractory' and 'intractable' or 'therapy-resistant' constipation and lack of understanding of the therapeutic ceilings before this diagnosis complicates the definition.

Aim: To conduct an online cross-sectional study among medical professionals and researchers across a range of countries, to propose a consensus definition, terminology and duration of medically unresponsive constipation.

Method: An expert-designed questionnaire was disseminated via Google Forms in a two-stage study over 2 months targeting paediatric gastroenterology professionals globally and Latin American clinicians with a translated version. The questionnaire had seven critical questions containing details needed to define medically unresponsive constipation. The study protocol was approved by the ethics review panel.

Results: The survey involved 1079 participants: 87 from various countries in the first phase and 992 from Latin America in the second. There were 619 (57.3%) general paediatricians and 462 (43 %) paediatric gastroenterologists. The preferred term to indicate poorly responding constipation was 'therapy-resistant constipation' (47.8%), followed by 'refractory constipation' (43.6%). The majority of respondents (92.9%) agreed on considering a time frame for defining refractory constipation, with 37.7% suggesting 2-3 months. 467 (43.2%) recommended including failure despite maximum laxative therapy with two agents should be considered as previous therapy failure. Compliance with therapy was deemed essential for successful treatment by 91.1%, assessed through detailed history-taking (47.4%) or medical/pharmacy records (29.4%).

Conclusion: Based on the professional views collected in this study, we propose the term 'therapy-resistant constipation' and it can be defined as constipation that is not responding to a maximum dose of at least two laxatives of different classes for a minimum of 3 months with good compliance in a secondary or tertiary care facility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信