IF 34.7 1区 医学 Q1 Neuroscience
Fran Hancock, Fernando E. Rosas, Andrea I. Luppi, Mengsen Zhang, Pedro A. M. Mediano, Joana Cabral, Gustavo Deco, Morten L. Kringelbach, Michael Breakspear, J. A. Scott Kelso, Federico E. Turkheimer
{"title":"Metastability demystified — the foundational past, the pragmatic present and the promising future","authors":"Fran Hancock, Fernando E. Rosas, Andrea I. Luppi, Mengsen Zhang, Pedro A. M. Mediano, Joana Cabral, Gustavo Deco, Morten L. Kringelbach, Michael Breakspear, J. A. Scott Kelso, Federico E. Turkheimer","doi":"10.1038/s41583-024-00883-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Healthy brain function depends on balancing stable integration between brain areas for effective coordinated functioning, with coexisting segregation that allows subsystems to express their functional specialization. Metastability, a concept from the dynamical systems literature, has been proposed as a key signature that characterizes this balance. Building on this principle, the neuroscience literature has leveraged the phenomenon of metastability to investigate various aspects of brain function in health and disease. However, this body of work often uses the notion of metastability heuristically, and sometimes inaccurately, making it difficult to navigate the vast literature, interpret findings and foster further development of theoretical and experimental methodologies. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of metastability and its applications in neuroscience, covering its scientific and historical foundations and the practical measures used to assess it in empirical data. We also provide a critical analysis of recent theoretical developments, clarifying common misconceptions and paving the road for future developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":19082,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Neuroscience","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":34.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-024-00883-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

健康的大脑功能有赖于平衡脑区之间的稳定整合,以实现有效的协调功能,同时也有赖于共存的分离,允许子系统表达其功能特化。动态系统文献中的一个概念 "可转移性"(Metastability)被认为是这种平衡的一个关键特征。在这一原理的基础上,神经科学文献利用可转移性现象研究了健康和疾病中大脑功能的各个方面。然而,这些研究成果往往只是启发式地使用了 "可迁移性 "这一概念,有时甚至使用得并不准确,这使得我们很难在浩如烟海的文献中游刃有余地解读研究结果,并促进理论和实验方法的进一步发展。在此,我们将全面回顾可迁移性及其在神经科学中的应用,包括其科学和历史基础,以及在经验数据中用于评估可迁移性的实用方法。我们还对最近的理论发展进行了批判性分析,澄清了常见的误解,并为未来的发展铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Metastability demystified — the foundational past, the pragmatic present and the promising future

Metastability demystified — the foundational past, the pragmatic present and the promising future

Healthy brain function depends on balancing stable integration between brain areas for effective coordinated functioning, with coexisting segregation that allows subsystems to express their functional specialization. Metastability, a concept from the dynamical systems literature, has been proposed as a key signature that characterizes this balance. Building on this principle, the neuroscience literature has leveraged the phenomenon of metastability to investigate various aspects of brain function in health and disease. However, this body of work often uses the notion of metastability heuristically, and sometimes inaccurately, making it difficult to navigate the vast literature, interpret findings and foster further development of theoretical and experimental methodologies. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of metastability and its applications in neuroscience, covering its scientific and historical foundations and the practical measures used to assess it in empirical data. We also provide a critical analysis of recent theoretical developments, clarifying common misconceptions and paving the road for future developments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
0.60%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Neuroscience is a journal that is part of the Nature Reviews portfolio. It focuses on the multidisciplinary science of neuroscience, which aims to provide a complete understanding of the structure and function of the central nervous system. Advances in molecular, developmental, and cognitive neuroscience have made it possible to tackle longstanding neurobiological questions. However, the wealth of knowledge generated by these advancements has created a need for new tools to organize and communicate this information efficiently. Nature Reviews Neuroscience aims to fulfill this need by offering an authoritative, accessible, topical, and engaging resource for scientists interested in all aspects of neuroscience. The journal covers subjects such as cellular and molecular neuroscience, development of the nervous system, sensory and motor systems, behavior, regulatory systems, higher cognition and language, computational neuroscience, and disorders of the brain. Editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信