对(非)健康建议的回应:青少年对健康内容创作者营养错误信息的处理和接受

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Appetite Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2024.107812
Margot Lissens, Darian Harff, Desiree Schmuck
{"title":"对(非)健康建议的回应:青少年对健康内容创作者营养错误信息的处理和接受","authors":"Margot Lissens, Darian Harff, Desiree Schmuck","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health information, particularly about nutrition, has flourished on social media in recent years. However, these claims often lack proper scrutiny enhancing the risk of misinformation. Nutrition misinformation on social media can originate from various sources including influencers, celebrities, and (freelance) journalists, who often have substantial reach. We conducted a between-subjects experiment, manipulating presence of misinformation and source type (influencer/celebrity/journalist), among N = 480 youth aged 16-22 years. We investigated how nutrition misinformation affects their nutrition (mis)beliefs and dieting. We also tested the moderating role of participants' issue involvement and the mediating role of the sources' perceived expertise. We found that youth remained largely unaffected by nutrition misinformation. However, perceived source expertise acted as a heuristic cue to determine trust in an unknown health content creator. This perceived expertise, in turn, increased perceived healthiness of food products mentioned by the 'expert' content creator regardless of misinformation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107812"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responses to (Un)healthy advice: Processing and acceptance of health content creators' nutrition misinformation by youth.\",\"authors\":\"Margot Lissens, Darian Harff, Desiree Schmuck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health information, particularly about nutrition, has flourished on social media in recent years. However, these claims often lack proper scrutiny enhancing the risk of misinformation. Nutrition misinformation on social media can originate from various sources including influencers, celebrities, and (freelance) journalists, who often have substantial reach. We conducted a between-subjects experiment, manipulating presence of misinformation and source type (influencer/celebrity/journalist), among N = 480 youth aged 16-22 years. We investigated how nutrition misinformation affects their nutrition (mis)beliefs and dieting. We also tested the moderating role of participants' issue involvement and the mediating role of the sources' perceived expertise. We found that youth remained largely unaffected by nutrition misinformation. However, perceived source expertise acted as a heuristic cue to determine trust in an unknown health content creator. This perceived expertise, in turn, increased perceived healthiness of food products mentioned by the 'expert' content creator regardless of misinformation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107812\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,健康信息,尤其是营养信息,在社交媒体上蓬勃发展。然而,这些说法往往缺乏适当的审查,增加了错误信息的风险。社交媒体上的营养错误信息可以来自各种来源,包括有影响力的人、名人和(自由撰稿人)记者,他们通常有很大的影响力。我们进行了一项被试之间的实验,在N = 480名年龄在16至22岁之间的年轻人中,操纵错误信息的存在和来源类型(影响者/名人/记者)。我们调查了营养错误信息如何影响他们的营养(错误)信念和节食。我们还测试了被试的问题介入的调节作用和来源的感知专业知识的中介作用。我们发现年轻人基本上不受营养错误信息的影响。然而,感知源专业知识充当启发式线索,以确定对未知健康内容创建者的信任。这种感知到的专业知识反过来又增加了“专家”内容创建者所提到的食品的健康感知,而不管错误信息的曝光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Responses to (Un)healthy advice: Processing and acceptance of health content creators' nutrition misinformation by youth.

Health information, particularly about nutrition, has flourished on social media in recent years. However, these claims often lack proper scrutiny enhancing the risk of misinformation. Nutrition misinformation on social media can originate from various sources including influencers, celebrities, and (freelance) journalists, who often have substantial reach. We conducted a between-subjects experiment, manipulating presence of misinformation and source type (influencer/celebrity/journalist), among N = 480 youth aged 16-22 years. We investigated how nutrition misinformation affects their nutrition (mis)beliefs and dieting. We also tested the moderating role of participants' issue involvement and the mediating role of the sources' perceived expertise. We found that youth remained largely unaffected by nutrition misinformation. However, perceived source expertise acted as a heuristic cue to determine trust in an unknown health content creator. This perceived expertise, in turn, increased perceived healthiness of food products mentioned by the 'expert' content creator regardless of misinformation exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信