导航系统下L5-S3与L5-S2全内镜下根切断术和消融治疗骶髂关节疼痛的比较研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-11-01
Jae Hwan Lee, Kuo-Tai Chen, Ying-Chieh Chen, Chien-Min Chen
{"title":"导航系统下L5-S3与L5-S2全内镜下根切断术和消融治疗骶髂关节疼痛的比较研究。","authors":"Jae Hwan Lee, Kuo-Tai Chen, Ying-Chieh Chen, Chien-Min Chen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement is a prevalent issue in health care. Surgical intervention, employing an endoscopic technique with a navigation system, targets and ablates nociceptive nerve fibers associated with SIJ pain, although the clinical effect of omitting rhizotomy of the lateral sacral branch of S3 remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of 2 full-endoscopic rhizotomy and ablation (FERA) techniques for SIJ pain and to determine the effect of omitting rhizotomy of the lateral sacral branch of S3 on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study adopted a retrospective cohort study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at a single medical institution by a neurosurgeon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 through March 2021, the records of 73 patients undergoing L5-S3 or L5-S2 FERA for SIJ pain associated with CLBP were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability, and MacNab criteria for satisfaction. The procedures were guided by 3-D robotic C-arm navigation. The L5-S3 FERA group underwent rhizotomy and ablation of the L5-S3 lateral branches, whereas the L5-S2 FERA group did not undergo rhizotomy of the S3 lateral sacral branch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant  improvements at one year in VAS and ODI scores with similar trends. The L5-S2 FERA group had a shorter operative time, particularly bilaterally, without complications. Although the L5-S3 FERA group initially presented a slightly higher recurrence rate at 6 months, their recurrence rate was equal with that of the L5-S2 FERA group at one year. Furthermore, the MacNab criteria showed comparable satisfaction rates in both groups.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>This was a small retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>L5-S2 FERA demonstrated clinical outcomes similar to those of L5-S3 FERA for pain relief, functional improvement, and satisfaction. Omitting S3 lateral branch rhizotomy did not adversely affect the outcomes. Surgeons may consider omitting S3 lateral branch rhizotomy for SIJ pain treatment, thereby reducing operative time while maintaining patient benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":"27 8","pages":"E943-E951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"L5-S3 Compared to L5-S2 Full-Endoscopic Rhizotomy and Ablation Under a Navigation System for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Hwan Lee, Kuo-Tai Chen, Ying-Chieh Chen, Chien-Min Chen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic low back pain (CLBP) with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement is a prevalent issue in health care. Surgical intervention, employing an endoscopic technique with a navigation system, targets and ablates nociceptive nerve fibers associated with SIJ pain, although the clinical effect of omitting rhizotomy of the lateral sacral branch of S3 remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of 2 full-endoscopic rhizotomy and ablation (FERA) techniques for SIJ pain and to determine the effect of omitting rhizotomy of the lateral sacral branch of S3 on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study adopted a retrospective cohort study design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted at a single medical institution by a neurosurgeon.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 through March 2021, the records of 73 patients undergoing L5-S3 or L5-S2 FERA for SIJ pain associated with CLBP were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability, and MacNab criteria for satisfaction. The procedures were guided by 3-D robotic C-arm navigation. The L5-S3 FERA group underwent rhizotomy and ablation of the L5-S3 lateral branches, whereas the L5-S2 FERA group did not undergo rhizotomy of the S3 lateral sacral branch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant  improvements at one year in VAS and ODI scores with similar trends. The L5-S2 FERA group had a shorter operative time, particularly bilaterally, without complications. Although the L5-S3 FERA group initially presented a slightly higher recurrence rate at 6 months, their recurrence rate was equal with that of the L5-S2 FERA group at one year. Furthermore, the MacNab criteria showed comparable satisfaction rates in both groups.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>This was a small retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>L5-S2 FERA demonstrated clinical outcomes similar to those of L5-S3 FERA for pain relief, functional improvement, and satisfaction. Omitting S3 lateral branch rhizotomy did not adversely affect the outcomes. Surgeons may consider omitting S3 lateral branch rhizotomy for SIJ pain treatment, thereby reducing operative time while maintaining patient benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":\"27 8\",\"pages\":\"E943-E951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性腰痛(CLBP)伴骶髂关节(SIJ)累及是医疗保健中的一个普遍问题。手术干预,采用带导航系统的内镜技术,靶向并切除与SIJ疼痛相关的伤害性神经纤维,尽管省略S3骶外侧支根切断术的临床效果仍不确定。目的:本研究旨在比较两种全内镜下根切断术和消融(FERA)技术治疗SIJ疼痛的临床结果,并确定省略S3骶外侧支根切断术对患者预后的影响。研究设计:本研究采用回顾性队列研究设计。环境:本研究由一名神经外科医生在一家医疗机构进行。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2021年3月73例L5-S3或L5-S2 FERA治疗CLBP相关SIJ疼痛的患者的记录。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛,Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估功能残疾,MacNab标准评估满意度。该过程由三维机器人c臂导航引导。L5-S3 FERA组进行了L5-S3侧支的根切断术和消融,而L5-S2 FERA组没有进行S3骶侧支的根切断术。结果:两组在一年内VAS和ODI评分均有显著改善,趋势相似。L5-S2 FERA组手术时间较短,特别是双侧,无并发症。虽然L5-S3 FERA组最初6个月的复发率略高,但1年的复发率与L5-S2 FERA组相当。此外,MacNab标准显示两组的满意率相当。局限性:这是一项小型回顾性研究。结论:L5-S2 FERA在疼痛缓解、功能改善和满意度方面的临床效果与L5-S3 FERA相似。忽略S3侧支根切断术对结果没有不利影响。外科医生可能会考虑在SIJ疼痛治疗中省略S3侧支根切断术,从而在保持患者利益的同时减少手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
L5-S3 Compared to L5-S2 Full-Endoscopic Rhizotomy and Ablation Under a Navigation System for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Comparative Study.

Background: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) involvement is a prevalent issue in health care. Surgical intervention, employing an endoscopic technique with a navigation system, targets and ablates nociceptive nerve fibers associated with SIJ pain, although the clinical effect of omitting rhizotomy of the lateral sacral branch of S3 remains uncertain.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of 2 full-endoscopic rhizotomy and ablation (FERA) techniques for SIJ pain and to determine the effect of omitting rhizotomy of the lateral sacral branch of S3 on patient outcomes.

Study design: This study adopted a retrospective cohort study design.

Setting: This study was conducted at a single medical institution by a neurosurgeon.

Methods: From January 2018 through March 2021, the records of 73 patients undergoing L5-S3 or L5-S2 FERA for SIJ pain associated with CLBP were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability, and MacNab criteria for satisfaction. The procedures were guided by 3-D robotic C-arm navigation. The L5-S3 FERA group underwent rhizotomy and ablation of the L5-S3 lateral branches, whereas the L5-S2 FERA group did not undergo rhizotomy of the S3 lateral sacral branch.

Results: Both groups showed significant  improvements at one year in VAS and ODI scores with similar trends. The L5-S2 FERA group had a shorter operative time, particularly bilaterally, without complications. Although the L5-S3 FERA group initially presented a slightly higher recurrence rate at 6 months, their recurrence rate was equal with that of the L5-S2 FERA group at one year. Furthermore, the MacNab criteria showed comparable satisfaction rates in both groups.

Limitation: This was a small retrospective study.

Conclusion: L5-S2 FERA demonstrated clinical outcomes similar to those of L5-S3 FERA for pain relief, functional improvement, and satisfaction. Omitting S3 lateral branch rhizotomy did not adversely affect the outcomes. Surgeons may consider omitting S3 lateral branch rhizotomy for SIJ pain treatment, thereby reducing operative time while maintaining patient benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信