轻触改变前庭诱发的平衡反应:对感觉运动重加权动力学的见解。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1152/jn.00166.2024
Megan H Goar, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Brian C Horslen
{"title":"轻触改变前庭诱发的平衡反应:对感觉运动重加权动力学的见解。","authors":"Megan H Goar, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Brian C Horslen","doi":"10.1152/jn.00166.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrated multisensory feedback plays a crucial role in balance control. Minimal fingertip contact with a surface (light touch), reduces the center of pressure (CoP) by adding sensory information about postural orientation and balance state. Electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) can increase sway by adding erroneous vestibular cues. This juxtaposition of conflicting sensory cues can be exploited to explore the dynamics of sensorimotor adaptations. We used continuous stochastic EVS (0-25 Hz; ±4 mA; 200-300 s) to evoke balance responses in CoP (<i>experiment 1</i>, <i>experiment 2</i>). Systems analyses (coherence, gain) quantified coupling and size of balance responses to EVS. We had participants either touch (TOUCH; <2 N) or not touch (NO-TOUCH) a load cell during EVS (<i>experiment 1</i>, <i>experiment 2</i>), or we intermittently removed the touch surface (<i>experiment 2</i>) to measure the effects of light touch on vestibular-evoked balance responses. We hypothesized that coherence and gain between EVS and CoP would decrease, consistent with the central nervous system (CNS) down-weighting vestibular cues that conflict with light touch. Light touch reduced CoP displacement but increased variation in the CoP signal explained by EVS input. Significant coherence between EVS and CoP was observed up to ∼30 Hz in both conditions but was significantly greater in the TOUCH condition from 12 to 28.5 Hz. Conversely, EVS-CoP gain was 63% lower in TOUCH compared with NO-TOUCH. Our findings show that light touch can reduce the size of vestibular-evoked responses but also increase high-frequency vestibular contributions for sway. This suggests that the CNS can use discrete changes in sensory inputs to alter balance behavior but cannot fully suppress responses to a potent cue.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study reveals that minimal fingertip contact (light touch) during balance tasks not only diminishes the impact of electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) on sway but also exposes a high-frequency center of pressure element, correlated to vestibular inputs, not typically seen in free standing. Specifically, light touch decreases the magnitude of EVS-induced sway while increasing coherence with EVS at higher frequencies. This illustrates the central nervous system's capacity to adaptively reweight sensorimotor processes for balance control.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"142-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Light touch alters vestibular-evoked balance responses: insights into dynamics of sensorimotor reweighting.\",\"authors\":\"Megan H Goar, Michael Barnett-Cowan, Brian C Horslen\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00166.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Integrated multisensory feedback plays a crucial role in balance control. Minimal fingertip contact with a surface (light touch), reduces the center of pressure (CoP) by adding sensory information about postural orientation and balance state. Electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) can increase sway by adding erroneous vestibular cues. This juxtaposition of conflicting sensory cues can be exploited to explore the dynamics of sensorimotor adaptations. We used continuous stochastic EVS (0-25 Hz; ±4 mA; 200-300 s) to evoke balance responses in CoP (<i>experiment 1</i>, <i>experiment 2</i>). Systems analyses (coherence, gain) quantified coupling and size of balance responses to EVS. We had participants either touch (TOUCH; <2 N) or not touch (NO-TOUCH) a load cell during EVS (<i>experiment 1</i>, <i>experiment 2</i>), or we intermittently removed the touch surface (<i>experiment 2</i>) to measure the effects of light touch on vestibular-evoked balance responses. We hypothesized that coherence and gain between EVS and CoP would decrease, consistent with the central nervous system (CNS) down-weighting vestibular cues that conflict with light touch. Light touch reduced CoP displacement but increased variation in the CoP signal explained by EVS input. Significant coherence between EVS and CoP was observed up to ∼30 Hz in both conditions but was significantly greater in the TOUCH condition from 12 to 28.5 Hz. Conversely, EVS-CoP gain was 63% lower in TOUCH compared with NO-TOUCH. Our findings show that light touch can reduce the size of vestibular-evoked responses but also increase high-frequency vestibular contributions for sway. This suggests that the CNS can use discrete changes in sensory inputs to alter balance behavior but cannot fully suppress responses to a potent cue.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study reveals that minimal fingertip contact (light touch) during balance tasks not only diminishes the impact of electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) on sway but also exposes a high-frequency center of pressure element, correlated to vestibular inputs, not typically seen in free standing. Specifically, light touch decreases the magnitude of EVS-induced sway while increasing coherence with EVS at higher frequencies. This illustrates the central nervous system's capacity to adaptively reweight sensorimotor processes for balance control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"142-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00166.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00166.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综合多感官反馈在平衡控制中起着重要作用。最小的指尖接触表面(轻触),通过增加姿势方向和平衡状态的感官信息来减少压力中心(CoP)。前庭电刺激(EVS)可以通过增加错误的前庭信号来增加摇摆。这种相互冲突的感觉线索的并置可以用来探索感觉运动适应的动力学。我们使用连续随机EVS (0-25Hz;±4马;在CoP (Exp-1, Exp-2)中唤起平衡反应。系统分析(相干性,增益)量化耦合和平衡响应的大小。我们让参与者触摸(touch;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Light touch alters vestibular-evoked balance responses: insights into dynamics of sensorimotor reweighting.

Integrated multisensory feedback plays a crucial role in balance control. Minimal fingertip contact with a surface (light touch), reduces the center of pressure (CoP) by adding sensory information about postural orientation and balance state. Electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) can increase sway by adding erroneous vestibular cues. This juxtaposition of conflicting sensory cues can be exploited to explore the dynamics of sensorimotor adaptations. We used continuous stochastic EVS (0-25 Hz; ±4 mA; 200-300 s) to evoke balance responses in CoP (experiment 1, experiment 2). Systems analyses (coherence, gain) quantified coupling and size of balance responses to EVS. We had participants either touch (TOUCH; <2 N) or not touch (NO-TOUCH) a load cell during EVS (experiment 1, experiment 2), or we intermittently removed the touch surface (experiment 2) to measure the effects of light touch on vestibular-evoked balance responses. We hypothesized that coherence and gain between EVS and CoP would decrease, consistent with the central nervous system (CNS) down-weighting vestibular cues that conflict with light touch. Light touch reduced CoP displacement but increased variation in the CoP signal explained by EVS input. Significant coherence between EVS and CoP was observed up to ∼30 Hz in both conditions but was significantly greater in the TOUCH condition from 12 to 28.5 Hz. Conversely, EVS-CoP gain was 63% lower in TOUCH compared with NO-TOUCH. Our findings show that light touch can reduce the size of vestibular-evoked responses but also increase high-frequency vestibular contributions for sway. This suggests that the CNS can use discrete changes in sensory inputs to alter balance behavior but cannot fully suppress responses to a potent cue.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study reveals that minimal fingertip contact (light touch) during balance tasks not only diminishes the impact of electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) on sway but also exposes a high-frequency center of pressure element, correlated to vestibular inputs, not typically seen in free standing. Specifically, light touch decreases the magnitude of EVS-induced sway while increasing coherence with EVS at higher frequencies. This illustrates the central nervous system's capacity to adaptively reweight sensorimotor processes for balance control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信