Rianne J Bosman, Peter F de Jong, Helma M Y Koomen
{"title":"运用以关系为中心的反思改善师生关系:个案研究。","authors":"Rianne J Bosman, Peter F de Jong, Helma M Y Koomen","doi":"10.1177/01632787241250366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated LLInC (Leerkracht-Leerling Interactie Coaching in Dutch, or Teacher Student Interaction Coaching), an intervention targeted at teachers' mental representations to improve dyadic teacher-child relationship quality. Four teachers and eight children from Dutch elementary schools participated in this single case study. Teachers themselves selected two children with whom they experienced a difficult relationship. The results indicated that teachers' global judgments of relationship quality improved from pretest to posttest for almost all teacher-child dyads. Day-to-day perceptions of conflict, closeness, and self-efficacy improved for a few teacher-child dyads, and especially for teacher-child dyads of the second targeted child. This implies that LLInC is especially helpful when carried out for at least two teacher-child dyads. The results of this study suggest that LLInC is promising, especially with regard to teachers' global relationship perceptions. However, LLInC should be further evaluated using a larger, representative sample, especially with regard to day-to-day perceptions of relationship quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787241250366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Teacher-Child Relationships Using Relationship-Focused Reflection: A Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rianne J Bosman, Peter F de Jong, Helma M Y Koomen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01632787241250366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated LLInC (Leerkracht-Leerling Interactie Coaching in Dutch, or Teacher Student Interaction Coaching), an intervention targeted at teachers' mental representations to improve dyadic teacher-child relationship quality. Four teachers and eight children from Dutch elementary schools participated in this single case study. Teachers themselves selected two children with whom they experienced a difficult relationship. The results indicated that teachers' global judgments of relationship quality improved from pretest to posttest for almost all teacher-child dyads. Day-to-day perceptions of conflict, closeness, and self-efficacy improved for a few teacher-child dyads, and especially for teacher-child dyads of the second targeted child. This implies that LLInC is especially helpful when carried out for at least two teacher-child dyads. The results of this study suggest that LLInC is promising, especially with regard to teachers' global relationship perceptions. However, LLInC should be further evaluated using a larger, representative sample, especially with regard to day-to-day perceptions of relationship quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation & the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1632787241250366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation & the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241250366\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241250366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了LLInC (Leerkracht-Leerling interactive Coaching in Dutch,又称师生互动辅导),这是一种针对教师心理表征的干预措施,旨在改善二元师生关系质量。来自荷兰小学的四名教师和八名儿童参与了这个单一的案例研究。老师们自己选择了两个和他们关系不好的孩子。结果表明,几乎所有师生对关系质量的整体判断从测试前到测试后都有所提高。日常冲突、亲密感和自我效能感的感知在一些教师与儿童的组合中有所改善,尤其是在第二个目标儿童的教师与儿童的组合中。这意味着LLInC在对至少两个老师和孩子的父子进行时特别有用。本研究的结果表明,LLInC是有希望的,特别是在教师的全球关系感知方面。然而,LLInC应该使用更大的、有代表性的样本进行进一步评估,特别是关于日常对关系质量的看法。
Improving Teacher-Child Relationships Using Relationship-Focused Reflection: A Case Study.
This study evaluated LLInC (Leerkracht-Leerling Interactie Coaching in Dutch, or Teacher Student Interaction Coaching), an intervention targeted at teachers' mental representations to improve dyadic teacher-child relationship quality. Four teachers and eight children from Dutch elementary schools participated in this single case study. Teachers themselves selected two children with whom they experienced a difficult relationship. The results indicated that teachers' global judgments of relationship quality improved from pretest to posttest for almost all teacher-child dyads. Day-to-day perceptions of conflict, closeness, and self-efficacy improved for a few teacher-child dyads, and especially for teacher-child dyads of the second targeted child. This implies that LLInC is especially helpful when carried out for at least two teacher-child dyads. The results of this study suggest that LLInC is promising, especially with regard to teachers' global relationship perceptions. However, LLInC should be further evaluated using a larger, representative sample, especially with regard to day-to-day perceptions of relationship quality.
期刊介绍:
Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days