主动脉夹层的机制:从病理变化到实验和计算机模型

IF 33.6 1区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Malte Rolf-Pissarczyk , Richard Schussnig , Thomas-Peter Fries , Dominik Fleischmann , John A. Elefteriades , Jay D. Humphrey , Gerhard A. Holzapfel
{"title":"主动脉夹层的机制:从病理变化到实验和计算机模型","authors":"Malte Rolf-Pissarczyk ,&nbsp;Richard Schussnig ,&nbsp;Thomas-Peter Fries ,&nbsp;Dominik Fleischmann ,&nbsp;John A. Elefteriades ,&nbsp;Jay D. Humphrey ,&nbsp;Gerhard A. Holzapfel","doi":"10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aortic dissection continues to be responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, although recent advances in medical data assimilation and in experimental and <em>in silico</em> models have improved our understanding of the initiation and progression of the accumulation of blood within the aortic wall. Hence, there remains a pressing necessity for innovative and enhanced models to more accurately characterize the associated pathological changes. Early on, experimental models were employed to uncover mechanisms in aortic dissection, such as hemodynamic changes and alterations in wall microstructure, and to assess the efficacy of medical implants. While experimental models were once the only option available, more recently they are also being used to validate <em>in silico</em> models. Based on an improved understanding of the deteriorated microstructure of the aortic wall, numerous multiscale material models have been proposed in recent decades to study the state of stress in dissected aortas, including the changes associated with damage and failure. Furthermore, when integrated with accessible patient-derived medical data, <em>in silico</em> models prove to be an invaluable tool for identifying correlations between hemodynamics, wall stresses, or thrombus formation in the deteriorated aortic wall. They are also advantageous for model-guided design of medical implants with the aim of evaluating the deployment and migration of implants in patients. Nonetheless, the utility of <em>in silico</em> models depends largely on patient-derived medical data, such as chosen boundary conditions or tissue properties. In this review article, our objective is to provide a thorough summary of medical data elucidating the pathological alterations associated with this disease. Concurrently, we aim to assess experimental models, as well as multiscale material and patient data-informed <em>in silico</em> models, that investigate various aspects of aortic dissection. In conclusion, we present a discourse on future perspectives, encompassing aspects of disease modeling, numerical challenges, and clinical applications, with a particular focus on aortic dissection. The aspiration is to inspire future studies, deepen our comprehension of the disease, and ultimately shape clinical care and treatment decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":411,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Materials Science","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 101363"},"PeriodicalIF":33.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental and in silico models\",\"authors\":\"Malte Rolf-Pissarczyk ,&nbsp;Richard Schussnig ,&nbsp;Thomas-Peter Fries ,&nbsp;Dominik Fleischmann ,&nbsp;John A. Elefteriades ,&nbsp;Jay D. Humphrey ,&nbsp;Gerhard A. Holzapfel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Aortic dissection continues to be responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, although recent advances in medical data assimilation and in experimental and <em>in silico</em> models have improved our understanding of the initiation and progression of the accumulation of blood within the aortic wall. Hence, there remains a pressing necessity for innovative and enhanced models to more accurately characterize the associated pathological changes. Early on, experimental models were employed to uncover mechanisms in aortic dissection, such as hemodynamic changes and alterations in wall microstructure, and to assess the efficacy of medical implants. While experimental models were once the only option available, more recently they are also being used to validate <em>in silico</em> models. Based on an improved understanding of the deteriorated microstructure of the aortic wall, numerous multiscale material models have been proposed in recent decades to study the state of stress in dissected aortas, including the changes associated with damage and failure. Furthermore, when integrated with accessible patient-derived medical data, <em>in silico</em> models prove to be an invaluable tool for identifying correlations between hemodynamics, wall stresses, or thrombus formation in the deteriorated aortic wall. They are also advantageous for model-guided design of medical implants with the aim of evaluating the deployment and migration of implants in patients. Nonetheless, the utility of <em>in silico</em> models depends largely on patient-derived medical data, such as chosen boundary conditions or tissue properties. In this review article, our objective is to provide a thorough summary of medical data elucidating the pathological alterations associated with this disease. Concurrently, we aim to assess experimental models, as well as multiscale material and patient data-informed <em>in silico</em> models, that investigate various aspects of aortic dissection. In conclusion, we present a discourse on future perspectives, encompassing aspects of disease modeling, numerical challenges, and clinical applications, with a particular focus on aortic dissection. The aspiration is to inspire future studies, deepen our comprehension of the disease, and ultimately shape clinical care and treatment decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Materials Science\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":33.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Materials Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079642524001324\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Materials Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0079642524001324","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管最近在医学数据同化、实验和计算机模型方面的进展提高了我们对主动脉壁内血液积聚的开始和进展的理解,但主动脉夹层仍然是导致大量发病率和死亡率的原因。因此,迫切需要创新和增强的模型来更准确地表征相关的病理变化。早期,实验模型被用来揭示主动脉夹层的机制,如血流动力学的改变和壁微观结构的改变,并评估医疗植入物的疗效。虽然实验模型曾经是唯一可用的选择,但最近它们也被用于验证计算机模型。基于对主动脉壁恶化微观结构的更好理解,近几十年来提出了许多多尺度材料模型来研究剥离主动脉的应力状态,包括与损伤和失效相关的变化。此外,当与可获得的患者来源的医疗数据相结合时,计算机模型被证明是识别血流动力学、壁应力或恶化的主动脉壁血栓形成之间相关性的宝贵工具。它们也有利于医疗植入物的模型引导设计,目的是评估植入物在患者体内的部署和迁移。尽管如此,计算机模型的实用性在很大程度上取决于患者的医疗数据,如选择的边界条件或组织特性。在这篇综述文章中,我们的目的是提供一个全面的医学数据总结,阐明与该疾病相关的病理改变。同时,我们的目标是评估实验模型,以及研究主动脉夹层各个方面的多尺度材料和患者数据的计算机模型。总之,我们提出了关于未来前景的论述,包括疾病建模、数值挑战和临床应用等方面,特别关注主动脉夹层。我们的愿望是启发未来的研究,加深我们对疾病的理解,并最终形成临床护理和治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental and in silico models
Aortic dissection continues to be responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, although recent advances in medical data assimilation and in experimental and in silico models have improved our understanding of the initiation and progression of the accumulation of blood within the aortic wall. Hence, there remains a pressing necessity for innovative and enhanced models to more accurately characterize the associated pathological changes. Early on, experimental models were employed to uncover mechanisms in aortic dissection, such as hemodynamic changes and alterations in wall microstructure, and to assess the efficacy of medical implants. While experimental models were once the only option available, more recently they are also being used to validate in silico models. Based on an improved understanding of the deteriorated microstructure of the aortic wall, numerous multiscale material models have been proposed in recent decades to study the state of stress in dissected aortas, including the changes associated with damage and failure. Furthermore, when integrated with accessible patient-derived medical data, in silico models prove to be an invaluable tool for identifying correlations between hemodynamics, wall stresses, or thrombus formation in the deteriorated aortic wall. They are also advantageous for model-guided design of medical implants with the aim of evaluating the deployment and migration of implants in patients. Nonetheless, the utility of in silico models depends largely on patient-derived medical data, such as chosen boundary conditions or tissue properties. In this review article, our objective is to provide a thorough summary of medical data elucidating the pathological alterations associated with this disease. Concurrently, we aim to assess experimental models, as well as multiscale material and patient data-informed in silico models, that investigate various aspects of aortic dissection. In conclusion, we present a discourse on future perspectives, encompassing aspects of disease modeling, numerical challenges, and clinical applications, with a particular focus on aortic dissection. The aspiration is to inspire future studies, deepen our comprehension of the disease, and ultimately shape clinical care and treatment decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Materials Science
Progress in Materials Science 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
59.60
自引率
0.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
11.4 months
期刊介绍: Progress in Materials Science is a journal that publishes authoritative and critical reviews of recent advances in the science of materials. The focus of the journal is on the fundamental aspects of materials science, particularly those concerning microstructure and nanostructure and their relationship to properties. Emphasis is also placed on the thermodynamics, kinetics, mechanisms, and modeling of processes within materials, as well as the understanding of material properties in engineering and other applications. The journal welcomes reviews from authors who are active leaders in the field of materials science and have a strong scientific track record. Materials of interest include metallic, ceramic, polymeric, biological, medical, and composite materials in all forms. Manuscripts submitted to Progress in Materials Science are generally longer than those found in other research journals. While the focus is on invited reviews, interested authors may submit a proposal for consideration. Non-invited manuscripts are required to be preceded by the submission of a proposal. Authors publishing in Progress in Materials Science have the option to publish their research via subscription or open access. Open access publication requires the author or research funder to meet a publication fee (APC). Abstracting and indexing services for Progress in Materials Science include Current Contents, Science Citation Index Expanded, Materials Science Citation Index, Chemical Abstracts, Engineering Index, INSPEC, and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信