癌症患者参与临床试验后的后悔。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kayla M Baker, Lucy Andersen, Molly McHugh, Anessa M Foxwell, Qiuping Zhou, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Liming Huang, Subhash Aryal, Christine Grady, Connie M Ulrich
{"title":"癌症患者参与临床试验后的后悔。","authors":"Kayla M Baker, Lucy Andersen, Molly McHugh, Anessa M Foxwell, Qiuping Zhou, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Liming Huang, Subhash Aryal, Christine Grady, Connie M Ulrich","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This analysis examined regret from participation in cancer clinical trials (CCT) and explored associations between regret and symptom burden, symptom bother, therapeutic optimism, and the importance of spiritual beliefs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from a study of American CCT patient-participants conducted from 2015 to 2019. Descriptive statistics, bivariate associations, and logistic regression were used to evaluate regret in this sample (<i>n</i> = 325). <b><i>Results:</i></b> About 10% of the sample reported regret. Younger age, increased symptom burden, increased symptom bother, increased severe symptoms, and a lower level of therapeutic optimism were significantly associated with regret (<i>p</i> < 0.05) compared to those who did not experience regret. The final regression model identified that younger age, symptom burden, and therapeutic optimism significantly predicted regret (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Understanding regret among research participants may improve CCT retention and ensure ethical research practices. Symptom experiences may play a key role in experiences of regret in CCT participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regret in Clinical Trial Participation Among Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Kayla M Baker, Lucy Andersen, Molly McHugh, Anessa M Foxwell, Qiuping Zhou, Sarah J Ratcliffe, Liming Huang, Subhash Aryal, Christine Grady, Connie M Ulrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This analysis examined regret from participation in cancer clinical trials (CCT) and explored associations between regret and symptom burden, symptom bother, therapeutic optimism, and the importance of spiritual beliefs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from a study of American CCT patient-participants conducted from 2015 to 2019. Descriptive statistics, bivariate associations, and logistic regression were used to evaluate regret in this sample (<i>n</i> = 325). <b><i>Results:</i></b> About 10% of the sample reported regret. Younger age, increased symptom burden, increased symptom bother, increased severe symptoms, and a lower level of therapeutic optimism were significantly associated with regret (<i>p</i> < 0.05) compared to those who did not experience regret. The final regression model identified that younger age, symptom burden, and therapeutic optimism significantly predicted regret (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Understanding regret among research participants may improve CCT retention and ensure ethical research practices. Symptom experiences may play a key role in experiences of regret in CCT participation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0147\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这项分析研究了因参与癌症临床试验(CCT)而产生的遗憾,并探讨了遗憾与症状负担、症状困扰、治疗乐观主义以及精神信仰的重要性之间的关联。研究方法这是对2015年至2019年进行的一项美国CCT患者参与者研究的横截面数据进行的二次分析。使用描述性统计、二元关联和逻辑回归来评估该样本(n = 325)中的遗憾。结果显示约 10% 的样本报告了遗憾。与没有后悔经历的人相比,年龄较小、症状负担加重、症状困扰增加、严重症状增加以及治疗乐观程度较低与后悔有显著关联(p < 0.05)。最终的回归模型表明,年龄较小、症状负担和治疗乐观程度明显预示着后悔(p < 0.05)。结论:了解研究参与者的遗憾可以提高 CCT 的保留率,确保研究实践符合道德规范。在参与 CCT 研究的过程中,症状体验可能是造成遗憾体验的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regret in Clinical Trial Participation Among Cancer Patients.

Background: This analysis examined regret from participation in cancer clinical trials (CCT) and explored associations between regret and symptom burden, symptom bother, therapeutic optimism, and the importance of spiritual beliefs. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from a study of American CCT patient-participants conducted from 2015 to 2019. Descriptive statistics, bivariate associations, and logistic regression were used to evaluate regret in this sample (n = 325). Results: About 10% of the sample reported regret. Younger age, increased symptom burden, increased symptom bother, increased severe symptoms, and a lower level of therapeutic optimism were significantly associated with regret (p < 0.05) compared to those who did not experience regret. The final regression model identified that younger age, symptom burden, and therapeutic optimism significantly predicted regret (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Understanding regret among research participants may improve CCT retention and ensure ethical research practices. Symptom experiences may play a key role in experiences of regret in CCT participation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信