利用慢速事件相关 fMRI 研究物体识别过程中试验水平的大脑行为关系。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1506661
Stephen J Gotts, Adrian W Gilmore, Alex Martin
{"title":"利用慢速事件相关 fMRI 研究物体识别过程中试验水平的大脑行为关系。","authors":"Stephen J Gotts, Adrian W Gilmore, Alex Martin","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1506661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding brain-behavior relationships is the core goal of cognitive neuroscience. However, these relationships-especially those related to complex cognitive and psychopathological behaviors-have recently been shown to suffer from very small effect sizes (0.1 or less), requiring potentially thousands of participants to yield robust findings. Here, we focus on a much more optimistic case utilizing task-based fMRI and a multi-echo acquisition with trial-level brain-behavior associations measured within participant. In a visual object identification task for which the behavioral measure is response time (RT), we show that while trial-level associations between BOLD and RT can similarly suffer from weak effect sizes, converting these associations to their corresponding group-level effects can yield robust peak effect sizes (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.0 or larger). Multi-echo denoising (Multi-Echo ICA or ME-ICA) yields larger effects than optimally combined multi-echo with no denoising, which is in turn an improvement over standard single-echo acquisition. While estimating these brain-behavior relationships benefits from the inclusion of a large number of trials per participant, even a modest number of trials (20-30 or more) yields robust group-level effect sizes, with replicable effects obtainable with relatively standard sample sizes (<i>N</i> = 20-30 participants per sample).</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1506661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harnessing slow event-related fMRI to investigate trial-level brain-behavior relationships during object identification.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen J Gotts, Adrian W Gilmore, Alex Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1506661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding brain-behavior relationships is the core goal of cognitive neuroscience. However, these relationships-especially those related to complex cognitive and psychopathological behaviors-have recently been shown to suffer from very small effect sizes (0.1 or less), requiring potentially thousands of participants to yield robust findings. Here, we focus on a much more optimistic case utilizing task-based fMRI and a multi-echo acquisition with trial-level brain-behavior associations measured within participant. In a visual object identification task for which the behavioral measure is response time (RT), we show that while trial-level associations between BOLD and RT can similarly suffer from weak effect sizes, converting these associations to their corresponding group-level effects can yield robust peak effect sizes (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.0 or larger). Multi-echo denoising (Multi-Echo ICA or ME-ICA) yields larger effects than optimally combined multi-echo with no denoising, which is in turn an improvement over standard single-echo acquisition. While estimating these brain-behavior relationships benefits from the inclusion of a large number of trials per participant, even a modest number of trials (20-30 or more) yields robust group-level effect sizes, with replicable effects obtainable with relatively standard sample sizes (<i>N</i> = 20-30 participants per sample).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1506661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1506661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1506661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解大脑与行为的关系是认知神经科学的核心目标。然而,这些关系--尤其是那些与复杂的认知和精神病理行为相关的关系--最近被证明具有非常小的效应量(0.1 或更小),需要潜在的数千名参与者才能产生稳健的研究结果。在这里,我们将重点放在一个更为乐观的案例上,即利用基于任务的 fMRI 和多回波采集,在参与者内部测量试验水平的大脑行为关联。在一项以反应时间(RT)作为行为测量指标的视觉物体识别任务中,我们发现虽然 BOLD 和 RT 之间的试验级关联同样会产生微弱的效应大小,但将这些关联转换为相应的组级效应却能产生稳健的峰值效应大小(Cohen's d = 1.0 或更大)。多回波去噪(Multi-Echo ICA 或 ME-ICA)比不去噪的多回波优化组合产生更大的效应,这反过来又比标准的单回波采集有所改进。虽然估算这些大脑与行为之间的关系得益于每个参与者的大量试验,但即使是适量的试验(20-30 次或更多)也能产生稳健的组级效应大小,而且相对标准的样本量(N = 每个样本 20-30 名参与者)也能获得可复制的效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Harnessing slow event-related fMRI to investigate trial-level brain-behavior relationships during object identification.

Understanding brain-behavior relationships is the core goal of cognitive neuroscience. However, these relationships-especially those related to complex cognitive and psychopathological behaviors-have recently been shown to suffer from very small effect sizes (0.1 or less), requiring potentially thousands of participants to yield robust findings. Here, we focus on a much more optimistic case utilizing task-based fMRI and a multi-echo acquisition with trial-level brain-behavior associations measured within participant. In a visual object identification task for which the behavioral measure is response time (RT), we show that while trial-level associations between BOLD and RT can similarly suffer from weak effect sizes, converting these associations to their corresponding group-level effects can yield robust peak effect sizes (Cohen's d = 1.0 or larger). Multi-echo denoising (Multi-Echo ICA or ME-ICA) yields larger effects than optimally combined multi-echo with no denoising, which is in turn an improvement over standard single-echo acquisition. While estimating these brain-behavior relationships benefits from the inclusion of a large number of trials per participant, even a modest number of trials (20-30 or more) yields robust group-level effect sizes, with replicable effects obtainable with relatively standard sample sizes (N = 20-30 participants per sample).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信