{"title":"饮食失调治疗对自闭症人群效果较差:提出改善结果的步骤。","authors":"Melissa H Black, Sven Bölte","doi":"10.1002/eat.24335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent mixed-methods review by Nimbley et al. (2024) raises important and concerning, yet not unexpected, insights into the usefulness of eating disorder (ED) treatment for autistic populations. In their review, Nimbley et al. find that ED treatments may be less effective for autistic groups, proposing a need for a greater understanding of ED in autistic populations, and more autism-informed measures and interventions for EDs. We take the opportunity in this commentary to further expand on the next steps that must be taken to inform future ED interventions for autistic populations. We reflect on similar observations of the impact of co-occurrence on intervention efficacy in autism, draw on contemporary movements in relation to interventions in the context of autism, and align with the conclusions of Nimbley et al., who propose that future ED interventions may need to be tailored to autistic populations. We present participatory and co-creation research approaches as a means to achieve this.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eating Disorder Treatments Are Less Effective for Autistic Populations: Proposing Steps Toward Improving Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa H Black, Sven Bölte\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent mixed-methods review by Nimbley et al. (2024) raises important and concerning, yet not unexpected, insights into the usefulness of eating disorder (ED) treatment for autistic populations. In their review, Nimbley et al. find that ED treatments may be less effective for autistic groups, proposing a need for a greater understanding of ED in autistic populations, and more autism-informed measures and interventions for EDs. We take the opportunity in this commentary to further expand on the next steps that must be taken to inform future ED interventions for autistic populations. We reflect on similar observations of the impact of co-occurrence on intervention efficacy in autism, draw on contemporary movements in relation to interventions in the context of autism, and align with the conclusions of Nimbley et al., who propose that future ED interventions may need to be tailored to autistic populations. We present participatory and co-creation research approaches as a means to achieve this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24335\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近,Nimbley 等人(2024 年)的混合方法综述对饮食失调(ED)治疗对自闭症人群的有用性提出了重要而又令人担忧的见解,但这并不出人意料。在他们的综述中,Nimbley 等人发现饮食失调治疗对自闭症群体的效果可能较差,因此提出需要进一步了解自闭症群体的饮食失调问题,并针对饮食失调采取更多自闭症相关措施和干预措施。我们借此机会在本评论中进一步阐述下一步必须采取的措施,以便为自闭症人群未来的 ED 干预措施提供依据。我们反思了类似的观察结果,即共同发生对自闭症干预效果的影响,借鉴了与自闭症干预相关的当代运动,并与 Nimbley 等人的结论保持一致,他们提出未来的 ED 干预可能需要针对自闭症人群量身定制。我们将参与式和共同创造研究方法作为实现这一目标的手段。
Eating Disorder Treatments Are Less Effective for Autistic Populations: Proposing Steps Toward Improving Outcomes.
The recent mixed-methods review by Nimbley et al. (2024) raises important and concerning, yet not unexpected, insights into the usefulness of eating disorder (ED) treatment for autistic populations. In their review, Nimbley et al. find that ED treatments may be less effective for autistic groups, proposing a need for a greater understanding of ED in autistic populations, and more autism-informed measures and interventions for EDs. We take the opportunity in this commentary to further expand on the next steps that must be taken to inform future ED interventions for autistic populations. We reflect on similar observations of the impact of co-occurrence on intervention efficacy in autism, draw on contemporary movements in relation to interventions in the context of autism, and align with the conclusions of Nimbley et al., who propose that future ED interventions may need to be tailored to autistic populations. We present participatory and co-creation research approaches as a means to achieve this.
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.