青少年和年轻成人癌症患者姑息关怀服务结构与关怀标准的一致性:临床实践国际调查》。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0141
Ursula M Sansom-Daly, Holly E Evans, Anne-Sophie Darlington, Meaghann S Weaver, Abby R Rosenberg, Lori Wiener, Antoinette Anazodo, Louise Sue, Maria Cable, Ruwanthie A Fernando, Anthony R Herbert, Toni Lindsay, Richard J Cohn, Claire E Wakefield
{"title":"青少年和年轻成人癌症患者姑息关怀服务结构与关怀标准的一致性:临床实践国际调查》。","authors":"Ursula M Sansom-Daly, Holly E Evans, Anne-Sophie Darlington, Meaghann S Weaver, Abby R Rosenberg, Lori Wiener, Antoinette Anazodo, Louise Sue, Maria Cable, Ruwanthie A Fernando, Anthony R Herbert, Toni Lindsay, Richard J Cohn, Claire E Wakefield","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Access to timely, age-appropriate palliative care services and end-of-life communication are two standards of care for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with cancer where cure is uncertain or unlikely. Health professionals' capacity to facilitate these standards is critical. This study aimed to understand AYA oncology health professionals' experienced practices in, and barriers to, delivering these standards of care across palliative care and end-of-life communication in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (UK). <b><i>Procedure:</i></b> We invited health professionals to complete a survey examining access, barriers to, and practices around these standards of care. Tailored to local settings, our survey assessed current delivery of palliative care and end-of-life communication services (including advance care planning [ACP]) and barriers to implementation of these. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 148 interdisciplinary health professionals participated (89% female overall; 83% female in Australia, 88% female in New Zealand, and 98% female in the UK). Across countries, participants reported that most institutions had an AYA cancer program (74% overall). Introduction to palliative care services was most often prognosis dependent or <i>\"not at any uniform time</i>.<i>\"</i> ACP was less frequently introduced than palliative care. The most endorsed barrier to palliative care team introduction, as well as ACP, was <i>\"some team members not knowing how to introduce the topic.\"</i> <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our results indicate that there are common barriers to AYAs receiving palliative care, end-of-life communication, and ACP. Given that health professionals' confidence in this area can enable facilitation of early, age-appropriate communication, resources and training are urgently needed to bridge these practice gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1606-1617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alignment of Palliative Care Service Structure and Standards of Care for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: An International Survey of Clinical Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Ursula M Sansom-Daly, Holly E Evans, Anne-Sophie Darlington, Meaghann S Weaver, Abby R Rosenberg, Lori Wiener, Antoinette Anazodo, Louise Sue, Maria Cable, Ruwanthie A Fernando, Anthony R Herbert, Toni Lindsay, Richard J Cohn, Claire E Wakefield\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jpm.2024.0141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Access to timely, age-appropriate palliative care services and end-of-life communication are two standards of care for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with cancer where cure is uncertain or unlikely. Health professionals' capacity to facilitate these standards is critical. This study aimed to understand AYA oncology health professionals' experienced practices in, and barriers to, delivering these standards of care across palliative care and end-of-life communication in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (UK). <b><i>Procedure:</i></b> We invited health professionals to complete a survey examining access, barriers to, and practices around these standards of care. Tailored to local settings, our survey assessed current delivery of palliative care and end-of-life communication services (including advance care planning [ACP]) and barriers to implementation of these. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 148 interdisciplinary health professionals participated (89% female overall; 83% female in Australia, 88% female in New Zealand, and 98% female in the UK). Across countries, participants reported that most institutions had an AYA cancer program (74% overall). Introduction to palliative care services was most often prognosis dependent or <i>\\\"not at any uniform time</i>.<i>\\\"</i> ACP was less frequently introduced than palliative care. The most endorsed barrier to palliative care team introduction, as well as ACP, was <i>\\\"some team members not knowing how to introduce the topic.\\\"</i> <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Our results indicate that there are common barriers to AYAs receiving palliative care, end-of-life communication, and ACP. Given that health professionals' confidence in this area can enable facilitation of early, age-appropriate communication, resources and training are urgently needed to bridge these practice gaps.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1606-1617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of palliative medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0141\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:及时获得与年龄相适应的姑息治疗服务和临终沟通是治疗不确定或不可能治愈的青少年癌症患者的两个护理标准。医疗专业人员促进这些标准的能力至关重要。本研究旨在了解澳大利亚、新西兰和英国(UK)的青少年肿瘤医护专业人员在提供姑息治疗和临终沟通的护理标准方面的经验做法和障碍。调查程序我们邀请医疗专业人员完成一项调查,研究这些关怀标准的获取途径、障碍和实践。我们的调查根据当地情况进行了调整,评估了姑息关怀和临终沟通服务(包括预先关怀计划 [ACP])的当前提供情况以及实施这些服务的障碍。调查结果显示共有 148 名跨学科医疗专业人士参与了调查(女性占总人数的 89%;澳大利亚女性占 83%,新西兰女性占 88%,英国女性占 98%)。在所有国家中,参与者都表示大多数机构都有老年癌症项目(总体比例为 74%)。姑息关怀服务的引入通常取决于预后或 "不在任何统一时间"。引入 ACP 的频率低于引入姑息关怀的频率。姑息关怀团队引入姑息关怀以及 ACP 的最主要障碍是 "一些团队成员不知道如何引入该主题"。结论:我们的研究结果表明,亚健康人群在接受姑息关怀、临终沟通和 ACP 方面存在共同障碍。鉴于医护人员在这方面的信心能够促进早期、适龄的沟通,因此迫切需要资源和培训来弥补这些实践差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alignment of Palliative Care Service Structure and Standards of Care for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: An International Survey of Clinical Practice.

Background: Access to timely, age-appropriate palliative care services and end-of-life communication are two standards of care for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) living with cancer where cure is uncertain or unlikely. Health professionals' capacity to facilitate these standards is critical. This study aimed to understand AYA oncology health professionals' experienced practices in, and barriers to, delivering these standards of care across palliative care and end-of-life communication in Australia, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom (UK). Procedure: We invited health professionals to complete a survey examining access, barriers to, and practices around these standards of care. Tailored to local settings, our survey assessed current delivery of palliative care and end-of-life communication services (including advance care planning [ACP]) and barriers to implementation of these. Results: In total, 148 interdisciplinary health professionals participated (89% female overall; 83% female in Australia, 88% female in New Zealand, and 98% female in the UK). Across countries, participants reported that most institutions had an AYA cancer program (74% overall). Introduction to palliative care services was most often prognosis dependent or "not at any uniform time." ACP was less frequently introduced than palliative care. The most endorsed barrier to palliative care team introduction, as well as ACP, was "some team members not knowing how to introduce the topic." Conclusions: Our results indicate that there are common barriers to AYAs receiving palliative care, end-of-life communication, and ACP. Given that health professionals' confidence in this area can enable facilitation of early, age-appropriate communication, resources and training are urgently needed to bridge these practice gaps.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信