系统回顾人们对大脑健康的了解。

IF 12.5 1区医学 Q1 CELL BIOLOGY

Ageing Research Reviews Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2024.102592

Malwina A. Niechcial , Shaimaa M. Elhag , Lauren M. Potter, Adele Dickson, Alan J. Gow

{"title":"系统回顾人们对大脑健康的了解。","authors":"Malwina A. Niechcial , Shaimaa M. Elhag , Lauren M. Potter, Adele Dickson, Alan J. Gow","doi":"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>As we age our cognitive abilities can change. However, the degree of change experienced is influenced by a range of factors. To understand what the public know about risk and protective factors for cognitive ageing, a systematic review was conducted of studies considering what people know about brain health.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The search strategy included quantitative and qualitative studies in English, including interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, surveys of beliefs about brain health (including predictions, opinions) in generally healthy adults. PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for published peer-reviewed literature; and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and National Grey Literature Collection, PsycExtra and Google searches for grey literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 37,197 records, one hundred and one were included, comprising 71 quantitative (22 grey literature), 27 qualitative (1 grey literature) and 3 mixed-methods (1 grey literature). Studies were grouped into three themes: <em>Concerns about cognitive ageing, Opportunities to promote brain health</em> and <em>Understanding dementia risk reduction and prevention</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Studies reported varying levels of knowledge of brain health, alongside some suggestions for brain health that were somewhat superficial and not always consistent with scientific consensus. There were differences between groups of participants who exhibited less knowledge of brain health, for example, men, older adults, those with lower education and incomes, and ethnic minorities. This review highlights the need for clear messaging around opportunities to promote brain health, including scientifically-endorsed lifestyle factors and more information on the mechanisms by which they operate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55545,"journal":{"name":"Ageing Research Reviews","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102592"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of what people know about brain health\",\"authors\":\"Malwina A. Niechcial , Shaimaa M. Elhag , Lauren M. Potter, Adele Dickson, Alan J. Gow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arr.2024.102592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>As we age our cognitive abilities can change. However, the degree of change experienced is influenced by a range of factors. To understand what the public know about risk and protective factors for cognitive ageing, a systematic review was conducted of studies considering what people know about brain health.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The search strategy included quantitative and qualitative studies in English, including interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, surveys of beliefs about brain health (including predictions, opinions) in generally healthy adults. PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for published peer-reviewed literature; and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and National Grey Literature Collection, PsycExtra and Google searches for grey literature.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From 37,197 records, one hundred and one were included, comprising 71 quantitative (22 grey literature), 27 qualitative (1 grey literature) and 3 mixed-methods (1 grey literature). Studies were grouped into three themes: <em>Concerns about cognitive ageing, Opportunities to promote brain health</em> and <em>Understanding dementia risk reduction and prevention</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Studies reported varying levels of knowledge of brain health, alongside some suggestions for brain health that were somewhat superficial and not always consistent with scientific consensus. There were differences between groups of participants who exhibited less knowledge of brain health, for example, men, older adults, those with lower education and incomes, and ethnic minorities. This review highlights the need for clear messaging around opportunities to promote brain health, including scientifically-endorsed lifestyle factors and more information on the mechanisms by which they operate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ageing Research Reviews\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ageing Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724004100\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568163724004100","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：随着年龄的增长，我们的认知能力会发生变化。然而，变化的程度会受到一系列因素的积极影响。为了了解公众对认知老化的风险和保护因素的了解程度，我们对相关研究进行了系统性回顾，以了解人们对大脑健康的了解程度：搜索策略包括英语的定量和定性研究，包括访谈、焦点小组、问卷调查、对一般健康成年人大脑健康信念的调查（包括预测、观点）。PubMed、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 Web of Science 用于搜索已出版的同行评审文献；ProQuest Dissertations and Theses 和 National Grey Literature Collection、PsycExtra 和 Google 用于搜索灰色文献：在 37,197 条记录中，有 101 条被收录，包括 71 篇定量研究（22 篇灰色文献）、27 篇定性研究（1 篇灰色文献）和 3 篇混合方法研究（1 篇灰色文献）。研究分为三个主题：讨论：讨论：研究报告对大脑健康的了解程度各不相同，同时还提出了一些大脑健康建议，这些建议有些肤浅，而且并不总是符合科学共识。对大脑健康了解较少的参与者群体之间存在差异，例如男性、老年人、教育程度和收入较低者以及少数民族。本综述强调，需要围绕促进大脑健康的机会发出明确的信息，包括科学认可的生活方式因素，以及有关这些因素运作机制的更多信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Systematic review of what people know about brain health

Objectives

As we age our cognitive abilities can change. However, the degree of change experienced is influenced by a range of factors. To understand what the public know about risk and protective factors for cognitive ageing, a systematic review was conducted of studies considering what people know about brain health.

Method

The search strategy included quantitative and qualitative studies in English, including interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, surveys of beliefs about brain health (including predictions, opinions) in generally healthy adults. PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for published peer-reviewed literature; and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and National Grey Literature Collection, PsycExtra and Google searches for grey literature.

Results

From 37,197 records, one hundred and one were included, comprising 71 quantitative (22 grey literature), 27 qualitative (1 grey literature) and 3 mixed-methods (1 grey literature). Studies were grouped into three themes: Concerns about cognitive ageing, Opportunities to promote brain health and Understanding dementia risk reduction and prevention.

Discussion

Studies reported varying levels of knowledge of brain health, alongside some suggestions for brain health that were somewhat superficial and not always consistent with scientific consensus. There were differences between groups of participants who exhibited less knowledge of brain health, for example, men, older adults, those with lower education and incomes, and ethnic minorities. This review highlights the need for clear messaging around opportunities to promote brain health, including scientifically-endorsed lifestyle factors and more information on the mechanisms by which they operate.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ageing Research Reviews 医学-老年医学

CiteScore

19.80

自引率

2.30%

发文量

216

审稿时长

55 days

期刊介绍： With the rise in average human life expectancy, the impact of ageing and age-related diseases on our society has become increasingly significant. Ageing research is now a focal point for numerous laboratories, encompassing leaders in genetics, molecular and cellular biology, biochemistry, and behavior. Ageing Research Reviews (ARR) serves as a cornerstone in this field, addressing emerging trends. ARR aims to fill a substantial gap by providing critical reviews and viewpoints on evolving discoveries concerning the mechanisms of ageing and age-related diseases. The rapid progress in understanding the mechanisms controlling cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival is unveiling new insights into the regulation of ageing. From telomerase to stem cells, and from energy to oxyradical metabolism, we are witnessing an exciting era in the multidisciplinary field of ageing research. The journal explores the cellular and molecular foundations of interventions that extend lifespan, such as caloric restriction. It identifies the underpinnings of manipulations that extend lifespan, shedding light on novel approaches for preventing age-related diseases. ARR publishes articles on focused topics selected from the expansive field of ageing research, with a particular emphasis on the cellular and molecular mechanisms of the aging process. This includes age-related diseases like cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and neurodegenerative disorders. The journal also covers applications of basic ageing research to lifespan extension and disease prevention, offering a comprehensive platform for advancing our understanding of this critical field.