风险比率的正确计算:如何计算?

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Perspectives on Behavior Science Pub Date : 2024-10-07 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1007/s40614-024-00423-3
M Christopher Newland
{"title":"风险比率的正确计算:如何计算?","authors":"M Christopher Newland","doi":"10.1007/s40614-024-00423-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent article (Joslyn, P. R., & Morris, S. L. in <i>Perspectives on Behavior Science</i>, 47(1), 167-196, 2024) advocates the use of risk ratios, or relative risk, in behavior analysis. The authors present a strong case for the use of risk ratios and how they might improve the science and application of behavior analysis. Unfortunately, their computation of the risk ratio is incorrect and their examples gloss over important nuances in how risk ratios should be used. The present article corrects the calculations, describes how to determine whether a particular risk ratio differs from a reference group, comments on the importance of stability of the data entering the calculation, and demonstrates approaches to presenting them visually, such as Forest plots.</p>","PeriodicalId":44993,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","volume":"47 4","pages":"803-814"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Proper Calculation of Risk Ratios: How and Why.\",\"authors\":\"M Christopher Newland\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40614-024-00423-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A recent article (Joslyn, P. R., & Morris, S. L. in <i>Perspectives on Behavior Science</i>, 47(1), 167-196, 2024) advocates the use of risk ratios, or relative risk, in behavior analysis. The authors present a strong case for the use of risk ratios and how they might improve the science and application of behavior analysis. Unfortunately, their computation of the risk ratio is incorrect and their examples gloss over important nuances in how risk ratios should be used. The present article corrects the calculations, describes how to determine whether a particular risk ratio differs from a reference group, comments on the importance of stability of the data entering the calculation, and demonstrates approaches to presenting them visually, such as Forest plots.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Behavior Science\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"803-814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582282/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Behavior Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-024-00423-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Behavior Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-024-00423-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的一篇文章(Joslyn, P. R., & Morris, S. L. in Perspectives on Behavior Science, 47(1), 167-196, 2024)提倡在行为分析中使用风险比率或相对风险。作者提出了使用风险比率的有力论据,以及如何使用风险比率改进行为分析的科学性和应用性。遗憾的是,他们对风险比率的计算并不正确,他们的例子也掩盖了如何使用风险比率的重要细微差别。本文纠正了计算错误,介绍了如何确定特定风险比值是否不同于参照组,评论了计算数据稳定性的重要性,并演示了森林图等直观展示风险比值的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Proper Calculation of Risk Ratios: How and Why.

A recent article (Joslyn, P. R., & Morris, S. L. in Perspectives on Behavior Science, 47(1), 167-196, 2024) advocates the use of risk ratios, or relative risk, in behavior analysis. The authors present a strong case for the use of risk ratios and how they might improve the science and application of behavior analysis. Unfortunately, their computation of the risk ratio is incorrect and their examples gloss over important nuances in how risk ratios should be used. The present article corrects the calculations, describes how to determine whether a particular risk ratio differs from a reference group, comments on the importance of stability of the data entering the calculation, and demonstrates approaches to presenting them visually, such as Forest plots.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Perspectives on Behavior Science PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Perspectives on Behavior Science is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International. It is published quarterly, and in addition to its articles on theoretical, experimental, and applied topics in behavior analysis, this journal also includes literature reviews, re-interpretations of published data, and articles on behaviorism as a philosophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信