评估颈动脉内膜剥脱术围手术期轻微并发症的 E-PASS 评分的有效性

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yutaka Morishima, Masahito Kawabori, Yoichi M Ito, Masayuki Gekka, Koji Furukawa, Yoshimasa Niiya, Miki Fujimura
{"title":"评估颈动脉内膜剥脱术围手术期轻微并发症的 E-PASS 评分的有效性","authors":"Yutaka Morishima, Masahito Kawabori, Yoichi M Ito, Masayuki Gekka, Koji Furukawa, Yoshimasa Niiya, Miki Fujimura","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is conducted to reduce the risk of cerebral infarction; therefore, a low complication rate is highly required. To predict long-term morbidity and mortality, various scoring systems have been considered; nonetheless, a model that can be utilized to estimate nonmajor temporary complications and minor complications is currently lacking. To evaluate the occurrence rate of perioperative complications in various surgical domains, the E-PASS (Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress) score is employed. This study was carried out to investigate the utility of the E-PASS score as a predictive factor for the risk of minor complications in patients undergoing CEA. The retrospective analysis was performed for 104 consecutive series of CEA procedures carried out at Otaru Municipal Hospital. The correlation between E-PASS and the rate of minor complications was examined. Sensitivity and specificity were used to construct a receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for accuracy. Postoperative minor complications occurred in eight cases (7.7%), including six vagal nerve injuries and two pneumonia cases. Three categorical data-preoperative risk score, surgical stress scores, and comprehensive risk score (CRS) -showed a good relationship with the postoperative minor complication. Among them, CRS presented the highest sensitivity and specificity, as indicated by an AUC of 0.68. The CRS cutoff value was calculated as -0.068, with a 1.7% postoperative minor complication rate for those lower than -0.068 and 14.0% for those higher than -0.068. The E-PASS score was effective for evaluating and predicting postoperative minor complications in patients with CEA procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of E-PASS Score for Evaluating Perioperative Minor Complications Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Yutaka Morishima, Masahito Kawabori, Yoichi M Ito, Masayuki Gekka, Koji Furukawa, Yoshimasa Niiya, Miki Fujimura\",\"doi\":\"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is conducted to reduce the risk of cerebral infarction; therefore, a low complication rate is highly required. To predict long-term morbidity and mortality, various scoring systems have been considered; nonetheless, a model that can be utilized to estimate nonmajor temporary complications and minor complications is currently lacking. To evaluate the occurrence rate of perioperative complications in various surgical domains, the E-PASS (Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress) score is employed. This study was carried out to investigate the utility of the E-PASS score as a predictive factor for the risk of minor complications in patients undergoing CEA. The retrospective analysis was performed for 104 consecutive series of CEA procedures carried out at Otaru Municipal Hospital. The correlation between E-PASS and the rate of minor complications was examined. Sensitivity and specificity were used to construct a receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for accuracy. Postoperative minor complications occurred in eight cases (7.7%), including six vagal nerve injuries and two pneumonia cases. Three categorical data-preoperative risk score, surgical stress scores, and comprehensive risk score (CRS) -showed a good relationship with the postoperative minor complication. Among them, CRS presented the highest sensitivity and specificity, as indicated by an AUC of 0.68. The CRS cutoff value was calculated as -0.068, with a 1.7% postoperative minor complication rate for those lower than -0.068 and 14.0% for those higher than -0.068. The E-PASS score was effective for evaluating and predicting postoperative minor complications in patients with CEA procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0035\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)的目的是降低脑梗死的风险,因此对并发症发生率的要求很高。为了预测长期发病率和死亡率,人们考虑了各种评分系统;然而,目前还缺乏一种可用于估计非主要临时并发症和轻微并发症的模型。为了评估不同手术领域围术期并发症的发生率,采用了 E-PASS(生理能力和手术压力评估)评分。本研究旨在探讨 E-PASS 评分作为 CEA 患者轻微并发症风险预测因素的实用性。该研究对小樽市立医院进行的 104 例连续性 CEA 手术进行了回顾性分析。研究了 E-PASS 与轻微并发症发生率之间的相关性。灵敏度和特异性用于构建接收器操作特征曲线,曲线下面积(AUC)用于计算准确性。术后轻微并发症发生了 8 例(7.7%),包括 6 例迷走神经损伤和 2 例肺炎。三项分类数据--术前风险评分、手术应激评分和综合风险评分(CRS)--显示出与术后轻微并发症的良好关系。其中,CRS 的灵敏度和特异性最高,AUC 为 0.68。计算得出的 CRS 临界值为-0.068,低于-0.068 的术后轻微并发症发生率为 1.7%,高于-0.068 的术后轻微并发症发生率为 14.0%。E-PASS评分能有效评估和预测CEA手术患者的术后轻微并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of E-PASS Score for Evaluating Perioperative Minor Complications Associated with Carotid Endarterectomy.

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is conducted to reduce the risk of cerebral infarction; therefore, a low complication rate is highly required. To predict long-term morbidity and mortality, various scoring systems have been considered; nonetheless, a model that can be utilized to estimate nonmajor temporary complications and minor complications is currently lacking. To evaluate the occurrence rate of perioperative complications in various surgical domains, the E-PASS (Estimation of Physiological Ability and Surgical Stress) score is employed. This study was carried out to investigate the utility of the E-PASS score as a predictive factor for the risk of minor complications in patients undergoing CEA. The retrospective analysis was performed for 104 consecutive series of CEA procedures carried out at Otaru Municipal Hospital. The correlation between E-PASS and the rate of minor complications was examined. Sensitivity and specificity were used to construct a receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for accuracy. Postoperative minor complications occurred in eight cases (7.7%), including six vagal nerve injuries and two pneumonia cases. Three categorical data-preoperative risk score, surgical stress scores, and comprehensive risk score (CRS) -showed a good relationship with the postoperative minor complication. Among them, CRS presented the highest sensitivity and specificity, as indicated by an AUC of 0.68. The CRS cutoff value was calculated as -0.068, with a 1.7% postoperative minor complication rate for those lower than -0.068 and 14.0% for those higher than -0.068. The E-PASS score was effective for evaluating and predicting postoperative minor complications in patients with CEA procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信