OrthoACCESS 2.0:利用翻转课堂混合学习模式为医科学生重新设计全国矫形外科课程。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Tanios Dagher BSE , Michael Kessler MD , Adam Levin MD , Sarah N. Pierrie MD , Brian Scannell MD , Tessa Balach MD
{"title":"OrthoACCESS 2.0:利用翻转课堂混合学习模式为医科学生重新设计全国矫形外科课程。","authors":"Tanios Dagher BSE ,&nbsp;Michael Kessler MD ,&nbsp;Adam Levin MD ,&nbsp;Sarah N. Pierrie MD ,&nbsp;Brian Scannell MD ,&nbsp;Tessa Balach MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Due to limited musculoskeletal education, students pursuing orthopaedic surgery often feel unprepared for residency. Clinical rotations provide some education; however, prior to the development of the Ortho Acting-Intern Coordinated Clinical Education and Surgical Skills (OrthoACCESS) curriculum in 2019, no standardized didactic curriculum existed. Over time, students desired interactive, case-based learning opportunities. Our objective was to design a flipped-classroom, blended learning curriculum and evaluate its ability to improve medical student orthopaedic knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>OrthoACCESS 2.0 is a 16-week, open-access curriculum consisting of didactic lectures, case discussions, and learning resources.</div><div>The curriculum was evaluated using pre-curriculum, post-case discussion, and post-curriculum surveys. Likert-item questions were evaluated with paired Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis. Free text responses were reviewed for emerging themes.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Lectures were presented weekly in-person for students at OrthoACCESS institutions with pre-recorded lectures available for non-rotating students. Faculty-led virtual case discussions consisted of 3 case presentations and breakout rooms for discussion. Learning resources (e.g., Anki Cards, “scut sheets”) were posted to the website.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>OrthoACCESS 2.0 was hosted from June to October 2023 with 35 participating institutions. All 226 student registrants completed the pre-curriculum survey and 69 completed the post-curriculum survey. Forty students attended at least 8/16 case discussions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the post-curriculum survey, 68% of participants reported “quite” or “extremely” strong orthopedic knowledge, compared to 23% beforehand (p &lt; 0.001). Postcase discussion surveys revealed significant increases in knowledge associated with each lecture and case discussion (p &lt; 0.001). The greatest student-reported benefits were the broad coverage of orthopedic topics (n=41) and learning how to think like an orthopaedic surgeon (n=20). The greatest barrier to attendance was clinical obligations during case discussions (n=44).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This flipped-classroom, blended learning curriculum has improved medical student foundational orthopaedic knowledge nationally. This model may be valuable for other specialties with limited undergraduate medical exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 1","pages":"Article 103337"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OrthoACCESS 2.0: Redesigning a National Orthopaedic Surgery Curriculum for Medical Students using a Flipped-Classroom Blended Learning Model\",\"authors\":\"Tanios Dagher BSE ,&nbsp;Michael Kessler MD ,&nbsp;Adam Levin MD ,&nbsp;Sarah N. Pierrie MD ,&nbsp;Brian Scannell MD ,&nbsp;Tessa Balach MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Due to limited musculoskeletal education, students pursuing orthopaedic surgery often feel unprepared for residency. Clinical rotations provide some education; however, prior to the development of the Ortho Acting-Intern Coordinated Clinical Education and Surgical Skills (OrthoACCESS) curriculum in 2019, no standardized didactic curriculum existed. Over time, students desired interactive, case-based learning opportunities. Our objective was to design a flipped-classroom, blended learning curriculum and evaluate its ability to improve medical student orthopaedic knowledge.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>OrthoACCESS 2.0 is a 16-week, open-access curriculum consisting of didactic lectures, case discussions, and learning resources.</div><div>The curriculum was evaluated using pre-curriculum, post-case discussion, and post-curriculum surveys. Likert-item questions were evaluated with paired Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis. Free text responses were reviewed for emerging themes.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Lectures were presented weekly in-person for students at OrthoACCESS institutions with pre-recorded lectures available for non-rotating students. Faculty-led virtual case discussions consisted of 3 case presentations and breakout rooms for discussion. Learning resources (e.g., Anki Cards, “scut sheets”) were posted to the website.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>OrthoACCESS 2.0 was hosted from June to October 2023 with 35 participating institutions. All 226 student registrants completed the pre-curriculum survey and 69 completed the post-curriculum survey. Forty students attended at least 8/16 case discussions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the post-curriculum survey, 68% of participants reported “quite” or “extremely” strong orthopedic knowledge, compared to 23% beforehand (p &lt; 0.001). Postcase discussion surveys revealed significant increases in knowledge associated with each lecture and case discussion (p &lt; 0.001). The greatest student-reported benefits were the broad coverage of orthopedic topics (n=41) and learning how to think like an orthopaedic surgeon (n=20). The greatest barrier to attendance was clinical obligations during case discussions (n=44).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This flipped-classroom, blended learning curriculum has improved medical student foundational orthopaedic knowledge nationally. This model may be valuable for other specialties with limited undergraduate medical exposure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 103337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004859\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720424004859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于肌肉骨骼教育有限,攻读骨科手术的学生常常感到没有为住院实习做好准备。临床轮转提供了一些教育;但是,在 2019 年开发骨科实习协调临床教育和手术技能(OrthoACCESS)课程之前,还没有标准化的说教课程。随着时间的推移,学生们希望获得基于案例的互动学习机会。我们的目标是设计一个翻转课堂、混合式学习课程,并评估其提高医学生骨科知识的能力:OrthoACCESS 2.0 是一门为期 16 周的开放式课程,由授课、病例讨论和学习资源组成。通过课程前、案例讨论后和课程后调查对课程进行评估。通过配对 Wilcoxon 符号秩分析对李克特项目问题进行了评估。对自由文本回复进行审查,以确定新出现的主题:每周为 OrthoACCESS 机构的学生亲自授课,并为非轮转学生提供预先录制的讲座。由教师主导的虚拟病例讨论包括 3 个病例演示和分组讨论室。学习资源(如 Anki 卡、"scut sheets")发布在网站上:OrthoACCESS 2.0 举办时间为 2023 年 6 月至 10 月,共有 35 所院校参与。所有 226 名注册学生都完成了课前调查,69 名学生完成了课后调查。40 名学生至少参加了 8/16 次案例讨论:在课程结束后的调查中,68%的参与者表示 "相当 "或 "非常 "了解骨科知识,而课程开始前这一比例仅为 23%(p < 0.001)。病例讨论后的调查显示,与每次讲座和病例讨论相关的知识都有显著增加(p < 0.001)。学生认为最大的收获是广泛的骨科主题覆盖面(41 人)和学会了如何像骨科医生一样思考(20 人)。参加学习的最大障碍是病例讨论期间的临床义务(人数=44):这种翻转课堂、混合式学习课程在全国范围内提高了医学生的骨科基础知识。这种模式可能对本科生接触医学知识有限的其他专业很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
OrthoACCESS 2.0: Redesigning a National Orthopaedic Surgery Curriculum for Medical Students using a Flipped-Classroom Blended Learning Model

Objective

Due to limited musculoskeletal education, students pursuing orthopaedic surgery often feel unprepared for residency. Clinical rotations provide some education; however, prior to the development of the Ortho Acting-Intern Coordinated Clinical Education and Surgical Skills (OrthoACCESS) curriculum in 2019, no standardized didactic curriculum existed. Over time, students desired interactive, case-based learning opportunities. Our objective was to design a flipped-classroom, blended learning curriculum and evaluate its ability to improve medical student orthopaedic knowledge.

Design

OrthoACCESS 2.0 is a 16-week, open-access curriculum consisting of didactic lectures, case discussions, and learning resources.
The curriculum was evaluated using pre-curriculum, post-case discussion, and post-curriculum surveys. Likert-item questions were evaluated with paired Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis. Free text responses were reviewed for emerging themes.

Setting

Lectures were presented weekly in-person for students at OrthoACCESS institutions with pre-recorded lectures available for non-rotating students. Faculty-led virtual case discussions consisted of 3 case presentations and breakout rooms for discussion. Learning resources (e.g., Anki Cards, “scut sheets”) were posted to the website.

Participants

OrthoACCESS 2.0 was hosted from June to October 2023 with 35 participating institutions. All 226 student registrants completed the pre-curriculum survey and 69 completed the post-curriculum survey. Forty students attended at least 8/16 case discussions.

Results

In the post-curriculum survey, 68% of participants reported “quite” or “extremely” strong orthopedic knowledge, compared to 23% beforehand (p < 0.001). Postcase discussion surveys revealed significant increases in knowledge associated with each lecture and case discussion (p < 0.001). The greatest student-reported benefits were the broad coverage of orthopedic topics (n=41) and learning how to think like an orthopaedic surgeon (n=20). The greatest barrier to attendance was clinical obligations during case discussions (n=44).

Conclusions

This flipped-classroom, blended learning curriculum has improved medical student foundational orthopaedic knowledge nationally. This model may be valuable for other specialties with limited undergraduate medical exposure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信