Astrid Richard, Serena Brontoladi, Estelle Sanquer, Cécile Chapuis-Vandenbogaerde, Alexandra Bucur, Valérie Charpillet, Véronique Soupre, Arnaud Picard, Natacha Kadlub
{"title":"裂隙类型对语言成绩有影响吗?法语鼻平衡测试的验证。","authors":"Astrid Richard, Serena Brontoladi, Estelle Sanquer, Cécile Chapuis-Vandenbogaerde, Alexandra Bucur, Valérie Charpillet, Véronique Soupre, Arnaud Picard, Natacha Kadlub","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The nasometer is the most widely used tool for objective assessment of phonation in both research and clinical practice. French standards have been validated in cases of total cleft lip and palate. The objective of this research is to propose a second validation study on velopalatal clefts. The 15 most sensitive and specific items from the initial validation were selected to create a test that is suitable for use in a clinical setting. A secondary objective is to ascertain the impact of cleft type on nasometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 39 participants with an isolated or non-isolated velopalatal cleft were recruited for the study. A speech therapist conducted a blinded subjective evaluation of phonation. The nasometric assessment was based on a corpus developed in collaboration with the CNRS Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory. The corpus is composed of items that are phonetically balanced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The obtained nasalance threshold values ranged from 11 to 40%. The study corroborated the existence of a voicing effect, whereby the articulation of voiced consonants was associated with a higher nasalance score. This effect, not previously observed in other studies, is specific to French phonetics. Participants with a velopalatal cleft exhibited higher nasalance scores compared to those with a total cleft.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By validating the most relevant stimuli, a French Nasalance Test can be established. With a view to harmonising assessment protocols, it would be appropriate to use the items from this test in subjective assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the type of cleft have an impact on language results? Validation of the Nasalance test in French.\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Richard, Serena Brontoladi, Estelle Sanquer, Cécile Chapuis-Vandenbogaerde, Alexandra Bucur, Valérie Charpillet, Véronique Soupre, Arnaud Picard, Natacha Kadlub\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The nasometer is the most widely used tool for objective assessment of phonation in both research and clinical practice. French standards have been validated in cases of total cleft lip and palate. The objective of this research is to propose a second validation study on velopalatal clefts. The 15 most sensitive and specific items from the initial validation were selected to create a test that is suitable for use in a clinical setting. A secondary objective is to ascertain the impact of cleft type on nasometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 39 participants with an isolated or non-isolated velopalatal cleft were recruited for the study. A speech therapist conducted a blinded subjective evaluation of phonation. The nasometric assessment was based on a corpus developed in collaboration with the CNRS Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory. The corpus is composed of items that are phonetically balanced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The obtained nasalance threshold values ranged from 11 to 40%. The study corroborated the existence of a voicing effect, whereby the articulation of voiced consonants was associated with a higher nasalance score. This effect, not previously observed in other studies, is specific to French phonetics. Participants with a velopalatal cleft exhibited higher nasalance scores compared to those with a total cleft.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By validating the most relevant stimuli, a French Nasalance Test can be established. With a view to harmonising assessment protocols, it would be appropriate to use the items from this test in subjective assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102159\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.102159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does the type of cleft have an impact on language results? Validation of the Nasalance test in French.
Objectives: The nasometer is the most widely used tool for objective assessment of phonation in both research and clinical practice. French standards have been validated in cases of total cleft lip and palate. The objective of this research is to propose a second validation study on velopalatal clefts. The 15 most sensitive and specific items from the initial validation were selected to create a test that is suitable for use in a clinical setting. A secondary objective is to ascertain the impact of cleft type on nasometry.
Methods: A total of 39 participants with an isolated or non-isolated velopalatal cleft were recruited for the study. A speech therapist conducted a blinded subjective evaluation of phonation. The nasometric assessment was based on a corpus developed in collaboration with the CNRS Phonetics and Phonology Laboratory. The corpus is composed of items that are phonetically balanced.
Results: The obtained nasalance threshold values ranged from 11 to 40%. The study corroborated the existence of a voicing effect, whereby the articulation of voiced consonants was associated with a higher nasalance score. This effect, not previously observed in other studies, is specific to French phonetics. Participants with a velopalatal cleft exhibited higher nasalance scores compared to those with a total cleft.
Conclusion: By validating the most relevant stimuli, a French Nasalance Test can be established. With a view to harmonising assessment protocols, it would be appropriate to use the items from this test in subjective assessment.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.