汽车所有权、汽车共享、邻里类型和出行态度:潜在聚类分析

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Jérôme Laviolette, Catherine Morency, E.O.D. Waygood
{"title":"汽车所有权、汽车共享、邻里类型和出行态度:潜在聚类分析","authors":"Jérôme Laviolette,&nbsp;Catherine Morency,&nbsp;E.O.D. Waygood","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The availability of carsharing in cities around the world has allowed more households to take advantage of the service as an alternative or a complement to private car ownership. While most research has looked at the effect of carsharing on car ownership decisions using carsharing users’ surveys, very few have modelled the choice of car ownership and carsharing jointly using independent surveys. This paper investigates the complex relationship between this joint decision, the built environment, and travel-related attitudes. Using data from two surveys in Montreal, latent-cluster analysis is used to identify a typology of residential neighbourhoods and a segmentation of attitude profiles. Cross-analyzing the two segmentations suggests that those with more positive attitudes towards the car are more likely to own cars and less likely to join carsharing across all neighbourhood types compared to less car-oriented profiles. However, people from all attitude profiles own fewer cars in more central neighbourhoods than in more suburban locations. Finally, a MNL model where sociodemographics and residential parking are controlled for confirms that both the built environment and attitudes independently influence the joint decision. Results also suggest that attitudes are associated with residential location choice, hinting at the presence of residential self-selection or environmental determinism. In summary, the analysis indicates that policy measures aimed at expanding carsharing vehicle availability for promoting carsharing as an alternative to car ownership may primarily impact individuals who are less drawn to the symbolic and emotional aspects of traditional cars.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 101292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Car ownership, carsharing, neighbourhood types and travel attitudes: A latent-cluster analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jérôme Laviolette,&nbsp;Catherine Morency,&nbsp;E.O.D. Waygood\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The availability of carsharing in cities around the world has allowed more households to take advantage of the service as an alternative or a complement to private car ownership. While most research has looked at the effect of carsharing on car ownership decisions using carsharing users’ surveys, very few have modelled the choice of car ownership and carsharing jointly using independent surveys. This paper investigates the complex relationship between this joint decision, the built environment, and travel-related attitudes. Using data from two surveys in Montreal, latent-cluster analysis is used to identify a typology of residential neighbourhoods and a segmentation of attitude profiles. Cross-analyzing the two segmentations suggests that those with more positive attitudes towards the car are more likely to own cars and less likely to join carsharing across all neighbourhood types compared to less car-oriented profiles. However, people from all attitude profiles own fewer cars in more central neighbourhoods than in more suburban locations. Finally, a MNL model where sociodemographics and residential parking are controlled for confirms that both the built environment and attitudes independently influence the joint decision. Results also suggest that attitudes are associated with residential location choice, hinting at the presence of residential self-selection or environmental determinism. In summary, the analysis indicates that policy measures aimed at expanding carsharing vehicle availability for promoting carsharing as an alternative to car ownership may primarily impact individuals who are less drawn to the symbolic and emotional aspects of traditional cars.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

汽车共享服务在世界各地城市的普及,使更多家庭能够利用这种服务作为拥有私家车的替代或补充。虽然大多数研究都是通过对汽车共享用户的调查来研究汽车共享对汽车所有权决策的影响,但很少有研究利用独立调查对汽车所有权和汽车共享的共同选择进行建模。本文研究了这一共同决策、建筑环境和旅行相关态度之间的复杂关系。本文使用蒙特利尔两次调查的数据,通过潜在聚类分析确定了住宅区的类型和态度特征的细分。对这两种细分的交叉分析表明,与不太注重汽车的人相比,对汽车持更积极态度的人更有可能拥有汽车,而在所有社区类型中加入汽车共享的可能性较低。然而,与郊区相比,所有态度的人在中心街区拥有的汽车都更少。最后,对社会人口统计学和住宅停车位进行控制的 MNL 模型证实,建筑环境和人们的态度都会对共同决策产生独立影响。结果还表明,人们的态度与住宅位置选择有关,这暗示着存在住宅自我选择或环境决定论。总之,分析表明,旨在扩大汽车共享车辆可用性以推广汽车共享作为汽车所有权替代方案的政策措施,可能主要影响那些对传统汽车的象征意义和情感方面不太感兴趣的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Car ownership, carsharing, neighbourhood types and travel attitudes: A latent-cluster analysis
The availability of carsharing in cities around the world has allowed more households to take advantage of the service as an alternative or a complement to private car ownership. While most research has looked at the effect of carsharing on car ownership decisions using carsharing users’ surveys, very few have modelled the choice of car ownership and carsharing jointly using independent surveys. This paper investigates the complex relationship between this joint decision, the built environment, and travel-related attitudes. Using data from two surveys in Montreal, latent-cluster analysis is used to identify a typology of residential neighbourhoods and a segmentation of attitude profiles. Cross-analyzing the two segmentations suggests that those with more positive attitudes towards the car are more likely to own cars and less likely to join carsharing across all neighbourhood types compared to less car-oriented profiles. However, people from all attitude profiles own fewer cars in more central neighbourhoods than in more suburban locations. Finally, a MNL model where sociodemographics and residential parking are controlled for confirms that both the built environment and attitudes independently influence the joint decision. Results also suggest that attitudes are associated with residential location choice, hinting at the presence of residential self-selection or environmental determinism. In summary, the analysis indicates that policy measures aimed at expanding carsharing vehicle availability for promoting carsharing as an alternative to car ownership may primarily impact individuals who are less drawn to the symbolic and emotional aspects of traditional cars.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信