胰管镜引导下碎石术治疗胰管结石:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Peiyao Huang, Hayat Khizar, Wensong Song, Jianfeng Yang
{"title":"胰管镜引导下碎石术治疗胰管结石:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Peiyao Huang, Hayat Khizar, Wensong Song, Jianfeng Yang","doi":"10.5152/tjg.2024.24110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Pancreatic duct stones (PDS) are one of the leading complications of chronic pancreatitis, causing intractable upper abdominal pain, aggravating the underlying disease, and even increasing the risk of pancreatic cancer. At present, pancreatoscopyguided lithotripsy is considered the second-line endoscopic treatment for pancreatic duct stones. In this systematic review and metaanalysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across several medical electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and Embase, encompassing publications up to December 2022. Studies reporting complete stone clearance rate, clinical success rate, and adverse event rate were included for analysis. We further aimed to compare the outcomes between electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies (5 prospective studies and 12 retrospective studies) with 441 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled complete stone clearance rate was 81% (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), pooled clinical success rate was 90% (95% CI, 0.84-0.95), while the pooled adverse event rate was 12% (95% CI, 0.07-0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic duct stones. This is evidenced by high pooled rates of complete stone clearance and clinical success, combined with a relatively low incidence of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":51205,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"35 11","pages":"811-821"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pancreatoscopy-Guided Lithotripsy for Pancreatic Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Peiyao Huang, Hayat Khizar, Wensong Song, Jianfeng Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/tjg.2024.24110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Pancreatic duct stones (PDS) are one of the leading complications of chronic pancreatitis, causing intractable upper abdominal pain, aggravating the underlying disease, and even increasing the risk of pancreatic cancer. At present, pancreatoscopyguided lithotripsy is considered the second-line endoscopic treatment for pancreatic duct stones. In this systematic review and metaanalysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across several medical electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and Embase, encompassing publications up to December 2022. Studies reporting complete stone clearance rate, clinical success rate, and adverse event rate were included for analysis. We further aimed to compare the outcomes between electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 studies (5 prospective studies and 12 retrospective studies) with 441 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled complete stone clearance rate was 81% (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), pooled clinical success rate was 90% (95% CI, 0.84-0.95), while the pooled adverse event rate was 12% (95% CI, 0.07-0.19).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic duct stones. This is evidenced by high pooled rates of complete stone clearance and clinical success, combined with a relatively low incidence of adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"35 11\",\"pages\":\"811-821\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562744/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2024.24110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/tjg.2024.24110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:胰管结石(PDS)是慢性胰腺炎的主要并发症之一,可引起顽固性上腹部疼痛,加重基础疾病,甚至增加胰腺癌风险。目前,胰镜引导下碎石术被认为是治疗胰管结石的二线内镜疗法。在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们评估了胰镜引导下碎石术的有效性和安全性:我们在多个医学电子数据库中进行了系统性检索,包括PubMed、Web of Science、Medline和Embase,涵盖截至2022年12月的出版物。报告结石完全清除率、临床成功率和不良事件发生率的研究被纳入分析范围。我们还旨在比较电液碎石治疗组和激光碎石治疗组的结果:荟萃分析共纳入了 17 项研究(5 项前瞻性研究和 12 项回顾性研究)和 441 名患者。汇总结石完全清除率为81%(95% CI,0.74-0.88),汇总临床成功率为90%(95% CI,0.84-0.95),汇总不良事件发生率为12%(95% CI,0.07-0.19):结论:胰镜引导下碎石术是一种安全有效的胰管结石治疗方法。结论:胰镜引导下碎石术是一种安全有效的胰管结石治疗方法,其结石完全清除率和临床成功率较高,不良反应发生率相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pancreatoscopy-Guided Lithotripsy for Pancreatic Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/aims: Pancreatic duct stones (PDS) are one of the leading complications of chronic pancreatitis, causing intractable upper abdominal pain, aggravating the underlying disease, and even increasing the risk of pancreatic cancer. At present, pancreatoscopyguided lithotripsy is considered the second-line endoscopic treatment for pancreatic duct stones. In this systematic review and metaanalysis, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy.

Materials and methods: A systematic search was conducted across several medical electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and Embase, encompassing publications up to December 2022. Studies reporting complete stone clearance rate, clinical success rate, and adverse event rate were included for analysis. We further aimed to compare the outcomes between electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy treatment groups.

Results: A total of 17 studies (5 prospective studies and 12 retrospective studies) with 441 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled complete stone clearance rate was 81% (95% CI, 0.74-0.88), pooled clinical success rate was 90% (95% CI, 0.84-0.95), while the pooled adverse event rate was 12% (95% CI, 0.07-0.19).

Conclusion: Pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic duct stones. This is evidenced by high pooled rates of complete stone clearance and clinical success, combined with a relatively low incidence of adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology (Turk J Gastroenterol) is the double-blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of the Turkish Society of Gastroenterology. The journal is a bimonthly publication, published on January, March, May, July, September, November and its publication language is English. The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology aims to publish international at the highest clinical and scientific level on original issues of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original papers, review articles, case reports and letters to the editor on clinical and experimental gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信