医生对基于团队的临床微系统的体验:对未来住院病人跨专业交流的影响。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katarzyna A Mastalerz, Sarah R Jordan, Kirsten J Broadfoot
{"title":"医生对基于团队的临床微系统的体验:对未来住院病人跨专业交流的影响。","authors":"Katarzyna A Mastalerz, Sarah R Jordan, Kirsten J Broadfoot","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2024.2426722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare clinical microsystems are small, goal-oriented groups of healthcare professionals that work together on a regular basis to provide care to discrete patient populations. They often include team-based frameworks such as bedside interprofessional rounds, geographic colocation of healthcare team members, interprofessional staff leadership, and unit-level data sharing. In inpatient settings, microsystems improve interprofessional communication and collaboration. In this qualitative study, we examined physician experiences of clinical microsystems and the mechanisms underpinning interprofessional communication in this environment. We interviewed 51 resident and hospitalist physicians. Thematic analysis of physician experiences revealed three key themes: (a) Clinical microsystem effect on workflow, (b) Open forum and work relationships, and (c) Face-to-face vs technology-based communication. Physicians described strong interprofessional relationships based on frequent face-to-face communication. Familiarity with healthcare team members, often resulting from being co-located to the same units, created a comfortable work environment, advanced patient care, and accelerated workflow. Physicians preferred in-person communication with interprofessional colleagues over technology-based communicationand described how in-person interactions enriched subsequent technology-led interactions. As the use of technology-based communication grows in inpatient settings, decreasing face-to-face interactions and facilitating dispersed care, understanding and implementing optimal conditions for effective interprofessional communication is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician experiences of team-based clinical microsystems: implications for the future of inpatient interprofessional communication.\",\"authors\":\"Katarzyna A Mastalerz, Sarah R Jordan, Kirsten J Broadfoot\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13561820.2024.2426722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Healthcare clinical microsystems are small, goal-oriented groups of healthcare professionals that work together on a regular basis to provide care to discrete patient populations. They often include team-based frameworks such as bedside interprofessional rounds, geographic colocation of healthcare team members, interprofessional staff leadership, and unit-level data sharing. In inpatient settings, microsystems improve interprofessional communication and collaboration. In this qualitative study, we examined physician experiences of clinical microsystems and the mechanisms underpinning interprofessional communication in this environment. We interviewed 51 resident and hospitalist physicians. Thematic analysis of physician experiences revealed three key themes: (a) Clinical microsystem effect on workflow, (b) Open forum and work relationships, and (c) Face-to-face vs technology-based communication. Physicians described strong interprofessional relationships based on frequent face-to-face communication. Familiarity with healthcare team members, often resulting from being co-located to the same units, created a comfortable work environment, advanced patient care, and accelerated workflow. Physicians preferred in-person communication with interprofessional colleagues over technology-based communicationand described how in-person interactions enriched subsequent technology-led interactions. As the use of technology-based communication grows in inpatient settings, decreasing face-to-face interactions and facilitating dispersed care, understanding and implementing optimal conditions for effective interprofessional communication is essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2426722\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2426722","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健临床微型系统是由医疗保健专业人员组成的以目标为导向的小型团队,他们定期合作,为不同的患者群体提供医疗保健服务。它们通常包括以团队为基础的框架,如床旁跨专业查房、医疗团队成员的地理位置共享、跨专业员工领导力以及单位级数据共享。在住院环境中,微系统可以改善专业间的沟通与协作。在这项定性研究中,我们考察了医生对临床微系统的体验,以及在这种环境下专业间沟通的基础机制。我们采访了 51 名住院医师和医院医师。对医生经验的主题分析揭示了三个关键主题:(a)临床微系统对工作流程的影响;(b)开放论坛与工作关系;(c)面对面交流与基于技术的交流。医生们描述了以频繁的面对面交流为基础的强有力的跨专业关系。与医疗团队成员的熟悉,往往是由于在同一单位办公,创造了一个舒适的工作环境,促进了病人护理,加快了工作流程。与基于技术的交流相比,医生们更喜欢与跨专业同事进行面对面交流,并描述了面对面交流如何丰富了随后以技术为主导的交流。随着基于技术的交流在住院环境中的使用越来越多,面对面的交流越来越少,促进了分散护理,因此了解和实施有效的专业间交流的最佳条件至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physician experiences of team-based clinical microsystems: implications for the future of inpatient interprofessional communication.

Healthcare clinical microsystems are small, goal-oriented groups of healthcare professionals that work together on a regular basis to provide care to discrete patient populations. They often include team-based frameworks such as bedside interprofessional rounds, geographic colocation of healthcare team members, interprofessional staff leadership, and unit-level data sharing. In inpatient settings, microsystems improve interprofessional communication and collaboration. In this qualitative study, we examined physician experiences of clinical microsystems and the mechanisms underpinning interprofessional communication in this environment. We interviewed 51 resident and hospitalist physicians. Thematic analysis of physician experiences revealed three key themes: (a) Clinical microsystem effect on workflow, (b) Open forum and work relationships, and (c) Face-to-face vs technology-based communication. Physicians described strong interprofessional relationships based on frequent face-to-face communication. Familiarity with healthcare team members, often resulting from being co-located to the same units, created a comfortable work environment, advanced patient care, and accelerated workflow. Physicians preferred in-person communication with interprofessional colleagues over technology-based communicationand described how in-person interactions enriched subsequent technology-led interactions. As the use of technology-based communication grows in inpatient settings, decreasing face-to-face interactions and facilitating dispersed care, understanding and implementing optimal conditions for effective interprofessional communication is essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信