干燥方法和条件对嫩菠萝鸡肉类似物理化性质的影响

IF 2.6 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Bootsrapa Leelawat*,  and , Tanwarat Taikerd, 
{"title":"干燥方法和条件对嫩菠萝鸡肉类似物理化性质的影响","authors":"Bootsrapa Leelawat*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Tanwarat Taikerd,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c0056110.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study aimed to investigate how tray drying (at 50 and 60 °C) and vacuum freeze-drying (at 40 and 50 °C, 20 Pa) affect the physicochemical properties of chicken meat analogs (CMAs). Tray drying resulted in higher water activity (<i>a</i><sub>w</sub>), yield percentage, redness (<i>a</i>*), browning index (BI), hardness, chewiness, and shear force, whereas lightness (<i>L</i>*) and water absorption capacity (WAC) were lower compared with vacuum freeze-drying. Elevated drying temperatures decreased the <i>a</i><sub>w</sub> and integrity index for both methods. No significant differences (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) were found in percentage yield, color (<i>L</i>*, <i>a</i>*, <i>b</i>*), and BI between CMAs dried at 40 and 50 °C using vacuum freeze-drying. The CMAs dried at 40 °C by vacuum freeze-drying was chosen for sensory evaluation, scoring not significantly different from the predried analog (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) in all attributes. Chemical analysis showed that 100 g of instant CMAs contain 1.71 g moisture, 1.73 g fat, 2.23 g ash, 53.7 g protein, and 25.1 g total carbohydrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":72048,"journal":{"name":"ACS food science & technology","volume":"4 11","pages":"2682–2689 2682–2689"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00561","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Drying Methods and Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties of Young Jackfruit-Based Chicken Meat Analogs\",\"authors\":\"Bootsrapa Leelawat*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Tanwarat Taikerd,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c0056110.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This study aimed to investigate how tray drying (at 50 and 60 °C) and vacuum freeze-drying (at 40 and 50 °C, 20 Pa) affect the physicochemical properties of chicken meat analogs (CMAs). Tray drying resulted in higher water activity (<i>a</i><sub>w</sub>), yield percentage, redness (<i>a</i>*), browning index (BI), hardness, chewiness, and shear force, whereas lightness (<i>L</i>*) and water absorption capacity (WAC) were lower compared with vacuum freeze-drying. Elevated drying temperatures decreased the <i>a</i><sub>w</sub> and integrity index for both methods. No significant differences (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) were found in percentage yield, color (<i>L</i>*, <i>a</i>*, <i>b</i>*), and BI between CMAs dried at 40 and 50 °C using vacuum freeze-drying. The CMAs dried at 40 °C by vacuum freeze-drying was chosen for sensory evaluation, scoring not significantly different from the predried analog (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) in all attributes. Chemical analysis showed that 100 g of instant CMAs contain 1.71 g moisture, 1.73 g fat, 2.23 g ash, 53.7 g protein, and 25.1 g total carbohydrates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS food science & technology\",\"volume\":\"4 11\",\"pages\":\"2682–2689 2682–2689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00561\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS food science & technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS food science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.4c00561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨托盘干燥(50 和 60 °C)和真空冷冻干燥(40 和 50 °C,20 Pa)如何影响鸡肉类似物(CMAs)的理化性质。与真空冷冻干燥相比,托盘干燥可获得更高的水分活度(aw)、产量百分比、红度(a*)、褐变指数(BI)、硬度、咀嚼度和剪切力,而重量(L*)和吸水能力(WAC)则较低。干燥温度升高会降低两种方法的 aw 和完整性指数。采用真空冷冻干燥法在 40 ℃ 和 50 ℃ 干燥的 CMA 在产量百分比、色泽(L*、a*、b*)和 BI 方面没有发现明显差异(p > 0.05)。在感官评价中,采用真空冷冻干燥法在 40 ℃ 下干燥的 CMA 与预干燥的类似物在所有属性上都没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。化学分析显示,100 克速溶 CMA 含水分 1.71 克、脂肪 1.73 克、灰分 2.23 克、蛋白质 53.7 克、总碳水化合物 25.1 克。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Drying Methods and Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties of Young Jackfruit-Based Chicken Meat Analogs

This study aimed to investigate how tray drying (at 50 and 60 °C) and vacuum freeze-drying (at 40 and 50 °C, 20 Pa) affect the physicochemical properties of chicken meat analogs (CMAs). Tray drying resulted in higher water activity (aw), yield percentage, redness (a*), browning index (BI), hardness, chewiness, and shear force, whereas lightness (L*) and water absorption capacity (WAC) were lower compared with vacuum freeze-drying. Elevated drying temperatures decreased the aw and integrity index for both methods. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in percentage yield, color (L*, a*, b*), and BI between CMAs dried at 40 and 50 °C using vacuum freeze-drying. The CMAs dried at 40 °C by vacuum freeze-drying was chosen for sensory evaluation, scoring not significantly different from the predried analog (p > 0.05) in all attributes. Chemical analysis showed that 100 g of instant CMAs contain 1.71 g moisture, 1.73 g fat, 2.23 g ash, 53.7 g protein, and 25.1 g total carbohydrates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信