利用项目反应理论分析法对修改后的医护团队态度量表进行评估。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yuta Takahashi, Tomoyuki Shinohara, Ayumu Nagamine, Emiri Takahashi, Daisuke Kato, Mari Takeuchi, Yoko Koike, Kyoko Obayashi, Hideomi Watanabe
{"title":"利用项目反应理论分析法对修改后的医护团队态度量表进行评估。","authors":"Yuta Takahashi, Tomoyuki Shinohara, Ayumu Nagamine, Emiri Takahashi, Daisuke Kato, Mari Takeuchi, Yoko Koike, Kyoko Obayashi, Hideomi Watanabe","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2024.2426724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The modified Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale (mATHCTS) is a self-administered questionnaire with 14 items to assess participants' perceptions of the impact of interprofessional collaboration. Its validity and reliability have been widely evaluated. The effect of interprofessional education (IPE) has been evaluated using changes in mATHCTS factor scores. However, several aspects of the scale require clarification: the difficulty of correctly answering each item; how well each item discriminates between respondents' abilities; and whether the mATHCTS is better at identifying those with higher/lower abilities. We investigated the mATHCTS's item characteristics such as difficulty, discrimination, and measurement accuracy using item-response theory (IRT) analysis. Health and welfare university students were administered a questionnaire prior to starting IPE in 2021. The results for 180 participants were analyzed based on IRT. The test-response (TRF) and test-information (TIF) functions, discrimination, and difficulty were estimated. All items' discrimination and difficulty were adequate. The TRF, which shows the relationship between scores and ability, increased monotonically. The TIF, which shows the relationship between ability and measurement accuracy, decreased as the total score increased. The mATHCTS effectively assessed participants' attitudes toward health care teams as a one-dimensional ability. The mATHCTS performed well in identifying participants with relatively low scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the modified attitudes toward health care teams scale using item response theory analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Takahashi, Tomoyuki Shinohara, Ayumu Nagamine, Emiri Takahashi, Daisuke Kato, Mari Takeuchi, Yoko Koike, Kyoko Obayashi, Hideomi Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13561820.2024.2426724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The modified Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale (mATHCTS) is a self-administered questionnaire with 14 items to assess participants' perceptions of the impact of interprofessional collaboration. Its validity and reliability have been widely evaluated. The effect of interprofessional education (IPE) has been evaluated using changes in mATHCTS factor scores. However, several aspects of the scale require clarification: the difficulty of correctly answering each item; how well each item discriminates between respondents' abilities; and whether the mATHCTS is better at identifying those with higher/lower abilities. We investigated the mATHCTS's item characteristics such as difficulty, discrimination, and measurement accuracy using item-response theory (IRT) analysis. Health and welfare university students were administered a questionnaire prior to starting IPE in 2021. The results for 180 participants were analyzed based on IRT. The test-response (TRF) and test-information (TIF) functions, discrimination, and difficulty were estimated. All items' discrimination and difficulty were adequate. The TRF, which shows the relationship between scores and ability, increased monotonically. The TIF, which shows the relationship between ability and measurement accuracy, decreased as the total score increased. The mATHCTS effectively assessed participants' attitudes toward health care teams as a one-dimensional ability. The mATHCTS performed well in identifying participants with relatively low scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interprofessional Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2426724\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2024.2426724","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经修订的 "对医疗团队的态度量表"(mATHCTS)是一份自填式问卷,共有 14 个项目,用于评估参与者对跨专业合作影响的看法。其有效性和可靠性已得到广泛评估。专业间教育(IPE)的效果是通过 mATHCTS 各因子得分的变化来评估的。然而,该量表有几个方面需要澄清:正确回答每个项目的难度;每个项目对受访者能力的区分度;以及 mATHCTS 是否能更好地识别能力较高/较低的受访者。我们采用项目反应理论(IRT)分析法研究了 mATHCTS 的项目特征,如难度、区分度和测量准确性。在 2021 年开始 IPE 之前,我们对卫生和福利专业的大学生进行了问卷调查。根据 IRT 对 180 名参与者的结果进行了分析。估算了测验反应函数(TRF)和测验信息函数(TIF)、区分度和难度。所有项目的区分度和难度都足够高。显示分数与能力之间关系的 TRF 呈单调增长。显示能力与测量准确性之间关系的 TIF 则随着总分的增加而降低。mATHCTS 有效地评估了参与者对医疗团队的态度这一单维能力。mATHCTS 在识别得分相对较低的参与者方面表现出色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of the modified attitudes toward health care teams scale using item response theory analysis.

The modified Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams Scale (mATHCTS) is a self-administered questionnaire with 14 items to assess participants' perceptions of the impact of interprofessional collaboration. Its validity and reliability have been widely evaluated. The effect of interprofessional education (IPE) has been evaluated using changes in mATHCTS factor scores. However, several aspects of the scale require clarification: the difficulty of correctly answering each item; how well each item discriminates between respondents' abilities; and whether the mATHCTS is better at identifying those with higher/lower abilities. We investigated the mATHCTS's item characteristics such as difficulty, discrimination, and measurement accuracy using item-response theory (IRT) analysis. Health and welfare university students were administered a questionnaire prior to starting IPE in 2021. The results for 180 participants were analyzed based on IRT. The test-response (TRF) and test-information (TIF) functions, discrimination, and difficulty were estimated. All items' discrimination and difficulty were adequate. The TRF, which shows the relationship between scores and ability, increased monotonically. The TIF, which shows the relationship between ability and measurement accuracy, decreased as the total score increased. The mATHCTS effectively assessed participants' attitudes toward health care teams as a one-dimensional ability. The mATHCTS performed well in identifying participants with relatively low scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信