老年人痴呆症的生命历程多学科社会心理预测因素:健康与退休研究的结果》。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae092
Sayaka Kuwayama, Wassim Tarraf, Kevin A González, Freddie Márquez, Hector M González
{"title":"老年人痴呆症的生命历程多学科社会心理预测因素:健康与退休研究的结果》。","authors":"Sayaka Kuwayama, Wassim Tarraf, Kevin A González, Freddie Márquez, Hector M González","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Identifying predictors of dementia may help improve risk assessments, increase awareness for risk reduction, and identify potential targets for interventions. We use a life-course psychosocial multidisciplinary modeling framework to examine leading predictors of dementia incidence.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We use data from the Health and Retirement Study to measure 57 psychosocial factors across 7 different domains: (i) demographics, (ii) childhood experiences, (iii) socioeconomic conditions, (iv) health behaviors, (v) social connections, (vi) psychological characteristics, and (vii) adverse adulthood experiences. Our outcome is dementia incidence (over 8 years) operationalized using Langa-Weir classification for adults aged 65+ years who meet criteria for normal cognition at the baseline when all psychosocial factors are measured (<i>N</i> = 1 784 in training set and <i>N</i> = 1 611 in testing set). We compare the standard statistical method (Logistic regression) with machine learning (ML) method (Random Forest) in identifying predictors across the disciplines of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standard and ML methods identified predictors that spanned multiple disciplines. The standard statistical methods identified lower education and childhood financial duress as among the leading predictors of dementia incidence. The ML method differed in their identification of predictors.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The findings emphasize the importance of upstream risk and protective factors and the long-reaching impact of childhood experiences on cognitive health. The ML approach highlights the importance of life-course multidisciplinary frameworks for improving evidence-based interventions for dementia. Further investigations are needed to identify how complex interactions of life-course factors can be addressed through interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 11","pages":"igae092"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life-Course Multidisciplinary Psychosocial Predictors of Dementia Among Older Adults: Results From the Health and Retirement Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sayaka Kuwayama, Wassim Tarraf, Kevin A González, Freddie Márquez, Hector M González\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Identifying predictors of dementia may help improve risk assessments, increase awareness for risk reduction, and identify potential targets for interventions. We use a life-course psychosocial multidisciplinary modeling framework to examine leading predictors of dementia incidence.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We use data from the Health and Retirement Study to measure 57 psychosocial factors across 7 different domains: (i) demographics, (ii) childhood experiences, (iii) socioeconomic conditions, (iv) health behaviors, (v) social connections, (vi) psychological characteristics, and (vii) adverse adulthood experiences. Our outcome is dementia incidence (over 8 years) operationalized using Langa-Weir classification for adults aged 65+ years who meet criteria for normal cognition at the baseline when all psychosocial factors are measured (<i>N</i> = 1 784 in training set and <i>N</i> = 1 611 in testing set). We compare the standard statistical method (Logistic regression) with machine learning (ML) method (Random Forest) in identifying predictors across the disciplines of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standard and ML methods identified predictors that spanned multiple disciplines. The standard statistical methods identified lower education and childhood financial duress as among the leading predictors of dementia incidence. The ML method differed in their identification of predictors.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The findings emphasize the importance of upstream risk and protective factors and the long-reaching impact of childhood experiences on cognitive health. The ML approach highlights the importance of life-course multidisciplinary frameworks for improving evidence-based interventions for dementia. Further investigations are needed to identify how complex interactions of life-course factors can be addressed through interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"8 11\",\"pages\":\"igae092\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:确定痴呆症的预测因素有助于改善风险评估、提高降低风险的意识并确定潜在的干预目标。我们采用生命历程社会心理多学科建模框架来研究痴呆症发病率的主要预测因素:我们利用 "健康与退休研究"(Health and Retirement Study)的数据测量了 7 个不同领域的 57 个社会心理因素:(i) 人口统计学;(ii) 童年经历;(iii) 社会经济条件;(iv) 健康行为;(v) 社会关系;(vi) 心理特征;以及 (vii) 成年后的不良经历。我们的研究结果是痴呆症发病率(8 年以上),采用 Langa-Weir 分类法对 65 岁以上、在基线时符合正常认知标准的成年人进行所有社会心理因素的测量(训练集为 1 784 人,测试集为 1 611 人)。我们比较了标准统计方法(逻辑回归)和机器学习(ML)方法(随机森林)在识别跨学科预测因子方面的效果:结果:标准统计方法和 ML 方法识别出了跨越多个学科的预测因子。标准统计方法发现,教育程度较低和童年经济压力是痴呆症发病率的主要预测因素。讨论与启示:研究结果强调了上游风险因素的重要性:研究结果强调了上游风险和保护因素的重要性,以及童年经历对认知健康的长期影响。ML方法强调了生命历程多学科框架对于改善基于证据的痴呆症干预措施的重要性。还需要进一步调查,以确定如何通过干预措施来解决生命历程因素之间复杂的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Life-Course Multidisciplinary Psychosocial Predictors of Dementia Among Older Adults: Results From the Health and Retirement Study.

Background and objectives: Identifying predictors of dementia may help improve risk assessments, increase awareness for risk reduction, and identify potential targets for interventions. We use a life-course psychosocial multidisciplinary modeling framework to examine leading predictors of dementia incidence.

Research design and methods: We use data from the Health and Retirement Study to measure 57 psychosocial factors across 7 different domains: (i) demographics, (ii) childhood experiences, (iii) socioeconomic conditions, (iv) health behaviors, (v) social connections, (vi) psychological characteristics, and (vii) adverse adulthood experiences. Our outcome is dementia incidence (over 8 years) operationalized using Langa-Weir classification for adults aged 65+ years who meet criteria for normal cognition at the baseline when all psychosocial factors are measured (N = 1 784 in training set and N = 1 611 in testing set). We compare the standard statistical method (Logistic regression) with machine learning (ML) method (Random Forest) in identifying predictors across the disciplines of interest.

Results: Standard and ML methods identified predictors that spanned multiple disciplines. The standard statistical methods identified lower education and childhood financial duress as among the leading predictors of dementia incidence. The ML method differed in their identification of predictors.

Discussion and implications: The findings emphasize the importance of upstream risk and protective factors and the long-reaching impact of childhood experiences on cognitive health. The ML approach highlights the importance of life-course multidisciplinary frameworks for improving evidence-based interventions for dementia. Further investigations are needed to identify how complex interactions of life-course factors can be addressed through interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信