杂食动物向植物性饮食过渡的意愿:决定因素和社会经济差异。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Judith Lehmann, Miriam Trübner, Alexander Patzina, Michael Jeitler, Rasmus Hoffmann, Christian S Kessler
{"title":"杂食动物向植物性饮食过渡的意愿:决定因素和社会经济差异。","authors":"Judith Lehmann, Miriam Trübner, Alexander Patzina, Michael Jeitler, Rasmus Hoffmann, Christian S Kessler","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant-based diets benefit individual health and the environment, yet most people eat omnivorous diets. We aim to (1) assess the role of multiple determinants for transitioning to more plant-based diets in a sample of omnivorous respondents, such as recommendations from doctors, scientists and politicians; lower costs; and increased availability, and to (2) identify which subpopulations are most receptive to which determinants. Using data from a survey on the use and acceptance of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Germany (N=4,065; N omnivorous=3,419; 84%), we find that the overall willingness to change to a more plant-based diet is low (mean=2.25 on a scale of 1 to 4). Respondents are most willing based on doctors' recommendations (mean=2.61), and if prices for plant-based products were lower (mean=2.55), and least willing based on scientists' and politicians' recommendations (mean=1.86). Regression analyses reveal that men, the baby boomer cohort, and respondents with lower levels of education have a significantly lower willingness to transition to more plant-based diets. Further, recommendations from doctors, scientists, and politicians appear to be promising interventions for addressing the dietary behavior of men and older cohorts. Interventions by doctors and lower prices for plant-based products have the highest potential to induce dietary change even among the reluctant, reducing health inequalities and promoting environmentally friendly behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107765"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The willingness to transition to a more plant-based diet among omnivores: determinants and socioeconomic differences.\",\"authors\":\"Judith Lehmann, Miriam Trübner, Alexander Patzina, Michael Jeitler, Rasmus Hoffmann, Christian S Kessler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Plant-based diets benefit individual health and the environment, yet most people eat omnivorous diets. We aim to (1) assess the role of multiple determinants for transitioning to more plant-based diets in a sample of omnivorous respondents, such as recommendations from doctors, scientists and politicians; lower costs; and increased availability, and to (2) identify which subpopulations are most receptive to which determinants. Using data from a survey on the use and acceptance of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Germany (N=4,065; N omnivorous=3,419; 84%), we find that the overall willingness to change to a more plant-based diet is low (mean=2.25 on a scale of 1 to 4). Respondents are most willing based on doctors' recommendations (mean=2.61), and if prices for plant-based products were lower (mean=2.55), and least willing based on scientists' and politicians' recommendations (mean=1.86). Regression analyses reveal that men, the baby boomer cohort, and respondents with lower levels of education have a significantly lower willingness to transition to more plant-based diets. Further, recommendations from doctors, scientists, and politicians appear to be promising interventions for addressing the dietary behavior of men and older cohorts. Interventions by doctors and lower prices for plant-based products have the highest potential to induce dietary change even among the reluctant, reducing health inequalities and promoting environmentally friendly behavior.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107765\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107765\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107765","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物性饮食有益于个人健康和环境,但大多数人都吃杂食。我们的目标是:(1) 在杂食受访者样本中评估向更多植物性饮食过渡的多种决定因素的作用,如医生、科学家和政治家的建议;更低的成本;更多的可获得性;(2) 确定哪些亚人群最容易接受哪些决定因素。通过对德国传统医学、补充医学和中西医结合医学的使用和接受情况的调查数据(样本数=4,065;杂食者=3,419;84%),我们发现受访者总体上不太愿意改用植物性饮食(在 1 到 4 的评分中,平均值=2.25)。受访者最愿意接受医生的建议(平均值=2.61),如果植物性产品的价格较低(平均值=2.55),而最不愿意接受科学家和政治家的建议(平均值=1.86)。回归分析表明,男性、婴儿潮一代和教育水平较低的受访者过渡到更多植物性饮食的意愿明显较低。此外,医生、科学家和政治家的建议似乎是解决男性和老年人群饮食行为的有希望的干预措施。医生的干预措施和降低植物性产品的价格最有可能促使不愿意改变饮食习惯的人改变饮食习惯,从而减少健康不平等现象,促进环保行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The willingness to transition to a more plant-based diet among omnivores: determinants and socioeconomic differences.

Plant-based diets benefit individual health and the environment, yet most people eat omnivorous diets. We aim to (1) assess the role of multiple determinants for transitioning to more plant-based diets in a sample of omnivorous respondents, such as recommendations from doctors, scientists and politicians; lower costs; and increased availability, and to (2) identify which subpopulations are most receptive to which determinants. Using data from a survey on the use and acceptance of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine in Germany (N=4,065; N omnivorous=3,419; 84%), we find that the overall willingness to change to a more plant-based diet is low (mean=2.25 on a scale of 1 to 4). Respondents are most willing based on doctors' recommendations (mean=2.61), and if prices for plant-based products were lower (mean=2.55), and least willing based on scientists' and politicians' recommendations (mean=1.86). Regression analyses reveal that men, the baby boomer cohort, and respondents with lower levels of education have a significantly lower willingness to transition to more plant-based diets. Further, recommendations from doctors, scientists, and politicians appear to be promising interventions for addressing the dietary behavior of men and older cohorts. Interventions by doctors and lower prices for plant-based products have the highest potential to induce dietary change even among the reluctant, reducing health inequalities and promoting environmentally friendly behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信