与儿童一起创造食品的未来:儿童对植物性肉类、鱼类和乳制品替代品看法的定性分析。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Lotte Pater, Elizabeth H Zandstra, Vincenzo Fogliano, Bea L P A Steenbekkers
{"title":"与儿童一起创造食品的未来:儿童对植物性肉类、鱼类和乳制品替代品看法的定性分析。","authors":"Lotte Pater, Elizabeth H Zandstra, Vincenzo Fogliano, Bea L P A Steenbekkers","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children's food preferences are a major influence on what is served for dinner in the household. However, little is known about children's perceptions of plant-based foods. This study aimed to better understand how 9-to-11-year-old children perceive plant-based meat and dairy alternatives. Different types of plant-based alternatives were investigated: meat and fish substitutes (legumes, nuts), replacements (tofu, tempeh), and analogues, as well as dairy substitutes. These alternatives were placed in a meal context, considering the influence of dish composition. The study combined design probes, interviews, and cooking sessions as different qualitative methods to explore children's perceptions. First, design probe packages with creative assignments were given to the children. Afterwards, one-to-one interviews were conducted to elaborate on the input gained from the assignments. Lastly, children created in small groups a pizza with plant-based alternatives. Results showed that taste was the topic mentioned most in both positive and negative ways. Initially, children generally had positive taste expectations for the analogues, while their taste expectations for substitutes and replacements were more negative. However, during the cooking session, there was no considerable difference in their actual taste perceptions of analogues, substitutes, and replacements. This highlights the importance of studying perceptions of plant-based alternatives in a real-life meal context, where substitutes and replacements can, next to analogues, also be an integral part of a meal. Although previous research shows that animal welfare is an important driver for children to choose plant-based alternatives, this study showed that animal welfare is linked to plant-based meat analogues only. Therefore, actively linking animal welfare to substitutes and replacements may help to guide children and their households towards a plant-forward diet with more plant-based ingredients such as vegetables, legumes, and grains.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"107761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Create the future of food with children: Qualitative insights into children's perception of plant-based meat, fish, and dairy alternatives.\",\"authors\":\"Lotte Pater, Elizabeth H Zandstra, Vincenzo Fogliano, Bea L P A Steenbekkers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.appet.2024.107761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Children's food preferences are a major influence on what is served for dinner in the household. However, little is known about children's perceptions of plant-based foods. This study aimed to better understand how 9-to-11-year-old children perceive plant-based meat and dairy alternatives. Different types of plant-based alternatives were investigated: meat and fish substitutes (legumes, nuts), replacements (tofu, tempeh), and analogues, as well as dairy substitutes. These alternatives were placed in a meal context, considering the influence of dish composition. The study combined design probes, interviews, and cooking sessions as different qualitative methods to explore children's perceptions. First, design probe packages with creative assignments were given to the children. Afterwards, one-to-one interviews were conducted to elaborate on the input gained from the assignments. Lastly, children created in small groups a pizza with plant-based alternatives. Results showed that taste was the topic mentioned most in both positive and negative ways. Initially, children generally had positive taste expectations for the analogues, while their taste expectations for substitutes and replacements were more negative. However, during the cooking session, there was no considerable difference in their actual taste perceptions of analogues, substitutes, and replacements. This highlights the importance of studying perceptions of plant-based alternatives in a real-life meal context, where substitutes and replacements can, next to analogues, also be an integral part of a meal. Although previous research shows that animal welfare is an important driver for children to choose plant-based alternatives, this study showed that animal welfare is linked to plant-based meat analogues only. Therefore, actively linking animal welfare to substitutes and replacements may help to guide children and their households towards a plant-forward diet with more plant-based ingredients such as vegetables, legumes, and grains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Appetite\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Appetite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107761\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童对食物的喜好是影响家庭晚餐内容的重要因素。然而,人们对儿童对植物性食品的看法知之甚少。本研究旨在更好地了解 9-11 岁儿童对植物性肉类和奶制品替代品的看法。研究调查了不同类型的植物性替代品:肉类和鱼类替代品(豆类、坚果)、替代品(豆腐、豆豉)、类似物以及乳制品替代品。考虑到菜肴成分的影响,这些替代品被置于膳食环境中。这项研究结合了设计探究、访谈和烹饪课程等不同的定性方法来探讨儿童的看法。首先,向孩子们发放了设计探究包,其中包含创意作业。然后,进行一对一访谈,详细阐述从作业中获得的信息。最后,孩子们以小组为单位制作了一个含有植物替代品的披萨。结果显示,味道是孩子们提到最多的话题,既有正面的,也有负面的。最初,孩子们普遍对类似物的口味抱有积极的期望,而对替代物的口味期望则较为消极。然而,在烹饪过程中,他们对类似物、替代物和替换物的实际味觉感受并无明显差异。这凸显了在真实的膳食环境中研究对植物替代品感知的重要性,因为在这种环境中,替代品和代用品与类似物一样,也是膳食中不可或缺的一部分。尽管之前的研究表明,动物福利是儿童选择植物基替代品的重要驱动因素,但本研究表明,动物福利仅与植物基肉类类似物相关。因此,积极地将动物福利与替代品和代用品联系起来,可能有助于引导儿童及其家庭采用以植物为基础的饮食,多吃蔬菜、豆类和谷物等以植物为基础的食材。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Create the future of food with children: Qualitative insights into children's perception of plant-based meat, fish, and dairy alternatives.

Children's food preferences are a major influence on what is served for dinner in the household. However, little is known about children's perceptions of plant-based foods. This study aimed to better understand how 9-to-11-year-old children perceive plant-based meat and dairy alternatives. Different types of plant-based alternatives were investigated: meat and fish substitutes (legumes, nuts), replacements (tofu, tempeh), and analogues, as well as dairy substitutes. These alternatives were placed in a meal context, considering the influence of dish composition. The study combined design probes, interviews, and cooking sessions as different qualitative methods to explore children's perceptions. First, design probe packages with creative assignments were given to the children. Afterwards, one-to-one interviews were conducted to elaborate on the input gained from the assignments. Lastly, children created in small groups a pizza with plant-based alternatives. Results showed that taste was the topic mentioned most in both positive and negative ways. Initially, children generally had positive taste expectations for the analogues, while their taste expectations for substitutes and replacements were more negative. However, during the cooking session, there was no considerable difference in their actual taste perceptions of analogues, substitutes, and replacements. This highlights the importance of studying perceptions of plant-based alternatives in a real-life meal context, where substitutes and replacements can, next to analogues, also be an integral part of a meal. Although previous research shows that animal welfare is an important driver for children to choose plant-based alternatives, this study showed that animal welfare is linked to plant-based meat analogues only. Therefore, actively linking animal welfare to substitutes and replacements may help to guide children and their households towards a plant-forward diet with more plant-based ingredients such as vegetables, legumes, and grains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信