在 98,459 名 55 岁及以上的参与者中,坚持生命线饮食与降低肺癌风险有关:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-10-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2024.1463481
Yangpiaoyi Shi, Li Xin, Linglong Peng, Zhiquan Xu, Hang Liu, Qi Wei, Wanhao Tan, Yaxu Wang, Ling Xiang, Haitao Gu
{"title":"在 98,459 名 55 岁及以上的参与者中,坚持生命线饮食与降低肺癌风险有关:一项大型前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Yangpiaoyi Shi, Li Xin, Linglong Peng, Zhiquan Xu, Hang Liu, Qi Wei, Wanhao Tan, Yaxu Wang, Ling Xiang, Haitao Gu","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2024.1463481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lifelines Diet Score (LLDS) was developed based on the 2015 Dutch Dietary Guidelines and current international scientific evidence. As a dietary quality assessment tool, the LLDS aims to evaluate the association between the Lifeline diet and the risk of chronic diseases. However, the evidence linking LLDS to lung cancer risk is currently limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to explore whether adherence to the LLDS is associated with reduced incidence and mortality of lung cancer, including its major histological subtypes: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this research were sourced from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Trial. The LLDS for each participant was calculated based on responses to the dietary history questionnaire (DHQ), and subsequently analyzed after being categorized into quintiles. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized to compute the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both the incidence and mortality of lung cancer, SCLC and NSCLC. Additionally, stratified analyses were conducted to ascertain possible effect modifiers, and several sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the mean follow-up periods of 8.8 years for incidence and 15.1 years for mortality, we identified 1,642 new cases and 1,172 related deaths from lung cancer. Participants in the highest quartiles of LLDS compared to those in the lowest exhibited a reduced incidence (HR<sub>Q4:Q1</sub> = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68-0.94, <i>P</i> for trend = 0.003) and mortality (HR<sub>Q4:Q1</sub> = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.67-0.98, <i>P</i> for trend = 0.009) of lung cancer. Furthermore, this negative association remained for SCLC incidence (HR<sub>Q4:Q1</sub> = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.35-0.87, <i>P</i> for trend = 0.002) and mortality (HR<sub>Q4:Q1</sub> = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25-0.70, <i>P</i> for trend <0.001). The association between LLDS and the incidence and mortality of lung cancer is not influenced by pre-defined potential effect modifiers (all <i>P</i> <sub>interaction</sub> > 0.05). The sensitivity analyses substantiated the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our research indicates that among 98,459 U.S. adults aged 55 and older, adherence to the LLDS is linked to a diminished incidence and mortality of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"11 ","pages":"1463481"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to lifelines diet is associated with lower lung cancer risk in 98,459 participants aged 55 years and above: a large prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Yangpiaoyi Shi, Li Xin, Linglong Peng, Zhiquan Xu, Hang Liu, Qi Wei, Wanhao Tan, Yaxu Wang, Ling Xiang, Haitao Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2024.1463481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lifelines Diet Score (LLDS) was developed based on the 2015 Dutch Dietary Guidelines and current international scientific evidence. As a dietary quality assessment tool, the LLDS aims to evaluate the association between the Lifeline diet and the risk of chronic diseases. However, the evidence linking LLDS to lung cancer risk is currently limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective was to explore whether adherence to the LLDS is associated with reduced incidence and mortality of lung cancer, including its major histological subtypes: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this research were sourced from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Trial. The LLDS for each participant was calculated based on responses to the dietary history questionnaire (DHQ), and subsequently analyzed after being categorized into quintiles. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized to compute the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both the incidence and mortality of lung cancer, SCLC and NSCLC. Additionally, stratified analyses were conducted to ascertain possible effect modifiers, and several sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the mean follow-up periods of 8.8 years for incidence and 15.1 years for mortality, we identified 1,642 new cases and 1,172 related deaths from lung cancer. Participants in the highest quartiles of LLDS compared to those in the lowest exhibited a reduced incidence (HR<sub>Q4:Q1</sub> = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68-0.94, <i>P</i> for trend = 0.003) and mortality (HR<sub>Q4:Q1</sub> = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.67-0.98, <i>P</i> for trend = 0.009) of lung cancer. Furthermore, this negative association remained for SCLC incidence (HR<sub>Q4:Q1</sub> = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.35-0.87, <i>P</i> for trend = 0.002) and mortality (HR<sub>Q4:Q1</sub> = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25-0.70, <i>P</i> for trend <0.001). The association between LLDS and the incidence and mortality of lung cancer is not influenced by pre-defined potential effect modifiers (all <i>P</i> <sub>interaction</sub> > 0.05). The sensitivity analyses substantiated the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, our research indicates that among 98,459 U.S. adults aged 55 and older, adherence to the LLDS is linked to a diminished incidence and mortality of lung cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1463481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11537889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1463481\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1463481","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生命线膳食评分(LLDS)是根据 2015 年荷兰膳食指南和当前国际科学证据开发的。作为一种膳食质量评估工具,生命线膳食评分旨在评估生命线膳食与慢性疾病风险之间的关联。然而,目前将 LLDS 与肺癌风险联系起来的证据还很有限:我们的目的是探索坚持 LLDS 是否与肺癌(包括其主要组织学亚型:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC))发病率和死亡率的降低有关:本研究的数据来源于前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌(PLCO)试验。根据对饮食史问卷(DHQ)的回答计算出每位参与者的 LLDS,然后将其分为五等分进行分析。利用 Cox 比例危险回归模型计算肺癌、SCLC 和 NSCLC 发病率和死亡率的危险比 (HRs) 和 95% 置信区间 (CIs)。此外,还进行了分层分析以确定可能的效应调节因素,并进行了多项敏感性分析以评估研究结果的稳健性:在平均 8.8 年的发病随访期和 15.1 年的死亡随访期中,我们发现了 1642 例肺癌新发病例和 1172 例相关死亡病例。肺癌发病率(HRQ4:Q1 = 0.80,95%CI = 0.68-0.94,P=0.003)和死亡率(HRQ4:Q1 = 0.81,95%CI = 0.67-0.98,P=0.009)方面,LLDS最高四分位数的参与者与最低四分位数的参与者相比均有所下降。此外,SCLC 的发病率(HRQ4:Q1 = 0.55,95% CI = 0.35-0.87,趋势 P = 0.002)和死亡率(HRQ4:Q1 = 0.42,95% CI = 0.25-0.70,趋势 P > 0.05)仍呈负相关。敏感性分析证实了结果的稳健性:总之,我们的研究表明,在 98,459 名 55 岁及以上的美国成年人中,坚持 LLDS 与肺癌发病率和死亡率的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adherence to lifelines diet is associated with lower lung cancer risk in 98,459 participants aged 55 years and above: a large prospective cohort study.

Background: Lifelines Diet Score (LLDS) was developed based on the 2015 Dutch Dietary Guidelines and current international scientific evidence. As a dietary quality assessment tool, the LLDS aims to evaluate the association between the Lifeline diet and the risk of chronic diseases. However, the evidence linking LLDS to lung cancer risk is currently limited.

Objective: Our objective was to explore whether adherence to the LLDS is associated with reduced incidence and mortality of lung cancer, including its major histological subtypes: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Data for this research were sourced from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Trial. The LLDS for each participant was calculated based on responses to the dietary history questionnaire (DHQ), and subsequently analyzed after being categorized into quintiles. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized to compute the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both the incidence and mortality of lung cancer, SCLC and NSCLC. Additionally, stratified analyses were conducted to ascertain possible effect modifiers, and several sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings.

Results: During the mean follow-up periods of 8.8 years for incidence and 15.1 years for mortality, we identified 1,642 new cases and 1,172 related deaths from lung cancer. Participants in the highest quartiles of LLDS compared to those in the lowest exhibited a reduced incidence (HRQ4:Q1 = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68-0.94, P for trend = 0.003) and mortality (HRQ4:Q1 = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.67-0.98, P for trend = 0.009) of lung cancer. Furthermore, this negative association remained for SCLC incidence (HRQ4:Q1 = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.35-0.87, P for trend = 0.002) and mortality (HRQ4:Q1 = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.25-0.70, P for trend <0.001). The association between LLDS and the incidence and mortality of lung cancer is not influenced by pre-defined potential effect modifiers (all P interaction > 0.05). The sensitivity analyses substantiated the robustness of the results.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our research indicates that among 98,459 U.S. adults aged 55 and older, adherence to the LLDS is linked to a diminished incidence and mortality of lung cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信