在食品和饲料风险评估中确定(新型)蛋白质的体外毒性测试方法

Louis-Marie Cobigo, Denis Habauzit, Kahina Mehennaoui, Arno C. Gutleb, Tommaso Serchi, Valérie Fessard, Kevin Hogeveen
{"title":"在食品和饲料风险评估中确定(新型)蛋白质的体外毒性测试方法","authors":"Louis-Marie Cobigo,&nbsp;Denis Habauzit,&nbsp;Kahina Mehennaoui,&nbsp;Arno C. Gutleb,&nbsp;Tommaso Serchi,&nbsp;Valérie Fessard,&nbsp;Kevin Hogeveen","doi":"10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This report documents the outcomes of the EFSA procurement (OC/EFSA/NIF/2022/01) aimed at identifying <i>in vitro</i> toxicity testing approaches for (novel) proteins in the context of food and feed safety assessment. In the present report, we present an integrated testing strategy for the evaluation of toxicity of novel/toxic proteins. A text-mining approach was used to create a literature database of toxic outcomes associated with toxic proteins retrieved from the UniProt KB database using the search term “Toxin activity”. It was shown that toxic proteins are produced by a relatively limited phylogenetic subset, including, among others, bacteria, insects, serpents, molluscs, and fungi. Toxicological effects of these proteins are generally conserved within phylogenetic groups. Analysis of toxic effects from these proteins was performed using GO term analysis as well as a text-mining based approach. Relevant tests to address and quantify these toxicity effects were identified and evaluated for their applicability in an <i>in vitro</i> based toxicity testing strategy. A stepwise approach was developed. As a first step, an initial <i>in silico</i> prediction of toxicity is carried out (Step 1). This is followed by a battery of <i>in vitro</i> assays to address the primary mechanisms of toxicity associated with toxic proteins (Step 2). If concern arises in the Step 2 battery of tests, the use of relevant <i>in vitro</i> model systems to explore potential target organ toxicity are required (Step 3). Knowledge gaps have been identified and recommendations are provided in <i>in vitro</i> toxicity testing strategies, in particular for (novel) proteins. Some of these gaps involve the selection and integration of a standardized, relevant <i>in vitro</i> digestion step, reflective of passage through the digestive tract, within the testing strategy, as well as a thorough assessment of the suitability and applicability of <i>in vitro</i> tests and new approach methodologies for regulatory toxicity assessment of (novel) proteins. To accelerate the incorporation of NAMs in the assessment of protein safety, case studies and proof of concept projects are needed to demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of <i>in vitro</i> toxicity testing strategies in the safety assessment of (novel) proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":100395,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Supporting Publications","volume":"21 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9099","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying in vitro toxicity testing approaches for (novel) proteins in the context of food and feed risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"Louis-Marie Cobigo,&nbsp;Denis Habauzit,&nbsp;Kahina Mehennaoui,&nbsp;Arno C. Gutleb,&nbsp;Tommaso Serchi,&nbsp;Valérie Fessard,&nbsp;Kevin Hogeveen\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This report documents the outcomes of the EFSA procurement (OC/EFSA/NIF/2022/01) aimed at identifying <i>in vitro</i> toxicity testing approaches for (novel) proteins in the context of food and feed safety assessment. In the present report, we present an integrated testing strategy for the evaluation of toxicity of novel/toxic proteins. A text-mining approach was used to create a literature database of toxic outcomes associated with toxic proteins retrieved from the UniProt KB database using the search term “Toxin activity”. It was shown that toxic proteins are produced by a relatively limited phylogenetic subset, including, among others, bacteria, insects, serpents, molluscs, and fungi. Toxicological effects of these proteins are generally conserved within phylogenetic groups. Analysis of toxic effects from these proteins was performed using GO term analysis as well as a text-mining based approach. Relevant tests to address and quantify these toxicity effects were identified and evaluated for their applicability in an <i>in vitro</i> based toxicity testing strategy. A stepwise approach was developed. As a first step, an initial <i>in silico</i> prediction of toxicity is carried out (Step 1). This is followed by a battery of <i>in vitro</i> assays to address the primary mechanisms of toxicity associated with toxic proteins (Step 2). If concern arises in the Step 2 battery of tests, the use of relevant <i>in vitro</i> model systems to explore potential target organ toxicity are required (Step 3). Knowledge gaps have been identified and recommendations are provided in <i>in vitro</i> toxicity testing strategies, in particular for (novel) proteins. Some of these gaps involve the selection and integration of a standardized, relevant <i>in vitro</i> digestion step, reflective of passage through the digestive tract, within the testing strategy, as well as a thorough assessment of the suitability and applicability of <i>in vitro</i> tests and new approach methodologies for regulatory toxicity assessment of (novel) proteins. To accelerate the incorporation of NAMs in the assessment of protein safety, case studies and proof of concept projects are needed to demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of <i>in vitro</i> toxicity testing strategies in the safety assessment of (novel) proteins.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Supporting Publications\",\"volume\":\"21 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9099\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Supporting Publications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Supporting Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2024.EN-9099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本报告记录了欧洲食品安全局的采购成果(OC/EFSA/NIF/2022/01),该采购旨在确定食品和饲料安全评估中(新型)蛋白质的体外毒性测试方法。在本报告中,我们介绍了评估新型/毒性蛋白质毒性的综合测试策略。我们采用文本挖掘法创建了一个文献数据库,其中包含使用 "毒素活性 "搜索词从 UniProt KB 数据库检索到的与有毒蛋白质相关的毒性结果。结果表明,产生有毒蛋白质的系统发育子集相对有限,其中包括细菌、昆虫、蛇类、软体动物和真菌。这些蛋白质的毒理效应在系统发育群内通常是一致的。利用 GO 术语分析和基于文本挖掘的方法对这些蛋白质的毒性效应进行了分析。确定了处理和量化这些毒性效应的相关测试,并评估了它们在基于体外的毒性测试策略中的适用性。制定了一个循序渐进的方法。第一步是对毒性进行初步的硅学预测(步骤 1)。然后进行一系列体外检测,以确定与有毒蛋白质相关的主要毒性机制(第 2 步)。如果在步骤 2 的一系列测试中出现问题,则需要使用相关的体外模型系统来探索潜在的靶器官毒性(步骤 3)。在体外毒性测试策略方面,特别是针对(新型)蛋白质的体外毒性测试策略方面,已经确定了知识差距并提出了建议。其中一些差距涉及在测试策略中选择和整合标准化的相关体外消化步骤,以反映通过消化道的情况,以及彻底评估体外测试和新方法方法对(新型)蛋白质监管毒性评估的适宜性和适用性。为加快将非吸收剂纳入蛋白质安全性评估,需要开展案例研究和概念验证项目,以证明体外毒性测试策略在(新型)蛋白质安全性评估中的实用性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying in vitro toxicity testing approaches for (novel) proteins in the context of food and feed risk assessment

This report documents the outcomes of the EFSA procurement (OC/EFSA/NIF/2022/01) aimed at identifying in vitro toxicity testing approaches for (novel) proteins in the context of food and feed safety assessment. In the present report, we present an integrated testing strategy for the evaluation of toxicity of novel/toxic proteins. A text-mining approach was used to create a literature database of toxic outcomes associated with toxic proteins retrieved from the UniProt KB database using the search term “Toxin activity”. It was shown that toxic proteins are produced by a relatively limited phylogenetic subset, including, among others, bacteria, insects, serpents, molluscs, and fungi. Toxicological effects of these proteins are generally conserved within phylogenetic groups. Analysis of toxic effects from these proteins was performed using GO term analysis as well as a text-mining based approach. Relevant tests to address and quantify these toxicity effects were identified and evaluated for their applicability in an in vitro based toxicity testing strategy. A stepwise approach was developed. As a first step, an initial in silico prediction of toxicity is carried out (Step 1). This is followed by a battery of in vitro assays to address the primary mechanisms of toxicity associated with toxic proteins (Step 2). If concern arises in the Step 2 battery of tests, the use of relevant in vitro model systems to explore potential target organ toxicity are required (Step 3). Knowledge gaps have been identified and recommendations are provided in in vitro toxicity testing strategies, in particular for (novel) proteins. Some of these gaps involve the selection and integration of a standardized, relevant in vitro digestion step, reflective of passage through the digestive tract, within the testing strategy, as well as a thorough assessment of the suitability and applicability of in vitro tests and new approach methodologies for regulatory toxicity assessment of (novel) proteins. To accelerate the incorporation of NAMs in the assessment of protein safety, case studies and proof of concept projects are needed to demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of in vitro toxicity testing strategies in the safety assessment of (novel) proteins.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信