Deniz Yanık, Nurullah Türker, Ahmet Mert Nalbantoğlu
{"title":"束状纤维桩和传统纤维桩同时存在水平骨丢失和开裂:有限元分析。","authors":"Deniz Yanık, Nurullah Türker, Ahmet Mert Nalbantoğlu","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Horizontal bone loss (HBL) and dehiscence are common supportive tissue defects. This study evaluated the stress distribution in the presence of HBL or dehiscence and two types of fiber posts. Twelve premolars that were endodontically treated (Model-E), restored with conventional (Model-C), and bundle (Model-B) post were modeled. Bone defects were created as control (Model-1), with 4 mm (Model-4) and 8 mm (Model-8) HBL, and dehiscence involving two-thirds of the root (Model-D). HBL was included in all aspects of the models, while dehiscence was confined to the buccal aspect. The models were subjected to a 200 N force, and von Mises stress was analyzed. Model-B1 showed higher stress than Model-C1 but was more homogeneous. In Model-D, the stress was limited to the area without bone and only occurred at the buccal aspect. The highest stress was observed in Model-B8. The presence of a post caused a 2-5.8 times increase in stress. When the crown-root ratio was 1:0.8, stress was in the coronal two-thirds of the root, while at a ratio of 1:0.3, stress was distributed throughout the entire root. Bundle post with 8 mm HBL increased the stress 5.8 times. HBL resulted in stress extending beyond the marginal bone, while dehiscence did not.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coexistence of horizontal bone loss and dehiscence with the bundle and conventional fiber post: a finite element analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Yanık, Nurullah Türker, Ahmet Mert Nalbantoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Horizontal bone loss (HBL) and dehiscence are common supportive tissue defects. This study evaluated the stress distribution in the presence of HBL or dehiscence and two types of fiber posts. Twelve premolars that were endodontically treated (Model-E), restored with conventional (Model-C), and bundle (Model-B) post were modeled. Bone defects were created as control (Model-1), with 4 mm (Model-4) and 8 mm (Model-8) HBL, and dehiscence involving two-thirds of the root (Model-D). HBL was included in all aspects of the models, while dehiscence was confined to the buccal aspect. The models were subjected to a 200 N force, and von Mises stress was analyzed. Model-B1 showed higher stress than Model-C1 but was more homogeneous. In Model-D, the stress was limited to the area without bone and only occurred at the buccal aspect. The highest stress was observed in Model-B8. The presence of a post caused a 2-5.8 times increase in stress. When the crown-root ratio was 1:0.8, stress was in the coronal two-thirds of the root, while at a ratio of 1:0.3, stress was distributed throughout the entire root. Bundle post with 8 mm HBL increased the stress 5.8 times. HBL resulted in stress extending beyond the marginal bone, while dehiscence did not.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.2423266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coexistence of horizontal bone loss and dehiscence with the bundle and conventional fiber post: a finite element analysis.
Horizontal bone loss (HBL) and dehiscence are common supportive tissue defects. This study evaluated the stress distribution in the presence of HBL or dehiscence and two types of fiber posts. Twelve premolars that were endodontically treated (Model-E), restored with conventional (Model-C), and bundle (Model-B) post were modeled. Bone defects were created as control (Model-1), with 4 mm (Model-4) and 8 mm (Model-8) HBL, and dehiscence involving two-thirds of the root (Model-D). HBL was included in all aspects of the models, while dehiscence was confined to the buccal aspect. The models were subjected to a 200 N force, and von Mises stress was analyzed. Model-B1 showed higher stress than Model-C1 but was more homogeneous. In Model-D, the stress was limited to the area without bone and only occurred at the buccal aspect. The highest stress was observed in Model-B8. The presence of a post caused a 2-5.8 times increase in stress. When the crown-root ratio was 1:0.8, stress was in the coronal two-thirds of the root, while at a ratio of 1:0.3, stress was distributed throughout the entire root. Bundle post with 8 mm HBL increased the stress 5.8 times. HBL resulted in stress extending beyond the marginal bone, while dehiscence did not.
期刊介绍:
The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.