在写作课上取消评分的调和方法：对克鲁桑的回应

IF 5 1区文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS

Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101151

Atta Gebril

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回应了德博拉-克鲁桑（Deborah Crusan）关于取消评分的论文，并反思了与使用这一概念相关的现有潜力和挑战。文章还提供了一个调和的视角，试图将相互竞争的写作评估范式结合起来，并考虑到背景限制和机遇。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Towards a reconciliatory approach to ungrading in writing classes: A response to Crusan

This article provides a response to Deborah Crusan’s paper on ungrading and reflects on the existing potentials and challenges associated with using this concept. The article also offers a reconciliatory perspective that attempts to bring together the competing writing assessment paradigms and to take into consideration contextual limitations and opportunities.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Second Language Writing LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

8.80

自引率

13.10%

发文量

审稿时长

59 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.