对有阅读障碍的学生进行工作记忆训练：对阅读和拼写辅导不太可能产生额外效果

IF 2.9 2区医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Research in Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104865

S.A.E. Walda, M. van Weerdenburg, A.M.T. Bosman

{"title":"对有阅读障碍的学生进行工作记忆训练：对阅读和拼写辅导不太可能产生额外效果","authors":"S.A.E. Walda, M. van Weerdenburg, A.M.T. Bosman","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Poor decoding and spelling (literacy) skills have been associated with weak working memory. Aims. The aim of this study was to elucidate the contribution of working memory to literacy progress in students with dyslexia. It has been suggested that working memory can be enhanced by training, which in turn may have a positive effect on reading and spelling abilities (e.g., Peijnenborg et al., 2023).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Procedures</h3><div>Participants consisted of a specific group of children with dyslexia and weak working memory skills (n = 62). The effect of Cogmed training on decoding and spelling progress during remediation was investigated using a randomized controlled trial with three research groups (experimental: Cogmed training; active control: fixed computerized training; passive control group).</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><div>Findings revealed that the Cogmed training enhanced working memory to a rather small extent and that no effects of the Cogmed training on literacy progress occurred over and above the reading and spelling remediation program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><div>Most likely, Cogmed training does not contribute to literacy development in children with dyslexia. The null results are important information for teachers of this specific group of students, albeit inevitably small samples in intervention studies applied to niche populations increase the risk of type-II errors. Therefore, replication studies are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"155 ","pages":"Article 104865"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working memory training in students with dyslexia: Additional effects to reading and spelling remediation not likely\",\"authors\":\"S.A.E. Walda, M. van Weerdenburg, A.M.T. Bosman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Poor decoding and spelling (literacy) skills have been associated with weak working memory. Aims. The aim of this study was to elucidate the contribution of working memory to literacy progress in students with dyslexia. It has been suggested that working memory can be enhanced by training, which in turn may have a positive effect on reading and spelling abilities (e.g., Peijnenborg et al., 2023).</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Procedures</h3><div>Participants consisted of a specific group of children with dyslexia and weak working memory skills (n = 62). The effect of Cogmed training on decoding and spelling progress during remediation was investigated using a randomized controlled trial with three research groups (experimental: Cogmed training; active control: fixed computerized training; passive control group).</div></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><div>Findings revealed that the Cogmed training enhanced working memory to a rather small extent and that no effects of the Cogmed training on literacy progress occurred over and above the reading and spelling remediation program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><div>Most likely, Cogmed training does not contribute to literacy development in children with dyslexia. The null results are important information for teachers of this specific group of students, albeit inevitably small samples in intervention studies applied to niche populations increase the risk of type-II errors. Therefore, replication studies are needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"155 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104865\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001975\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224001975","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景解码和拼写（识字）能力差与工作记忆薄弱有关。研究目的本研究旨在阐明工作记忆对有阅读障碍的学生识字进展的贡献。有研究表明，工作记忆可以通过训练得到增强，进而对阅读和拼写能力产生积极影响（例如，Peijnenborg et al.我们采用随机对照试验的方法，调查了 Cogmed 训练对补救过程中解码和拼写进步的影响，试验分为三个研究组（实验组：Cogmed 训练；积极对照组：Cogmed 训练；主动对照组：Cogmed 训练）：结果和成果研究结果显示，Cogmed 训练对工作记忆的增强作用很小，而且在阅读和拼写补救计划之外，Cogmed 训练对识字进展没有任何影响。结论和意义Cogmed 训练很可能无助于阅读障碍儿童的识字发展。尽管针对小众群体的干预研究不可避免地会增加II型错误的风险，但无效结果对这一特殊学生群体的教师来说是一个重要信息。因此，需要进行重复研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Working memory training in students with dyslexia: Additional effects to reading and spelling remediation not likely

Background

Poor decoding and spelling (literacy) skills have been associated with weak working memory. Aims. The aim of this study was to elucidate the contribution of working memory to literacy progress in students with dyslexia. It has been suggested that working memory can be enhanced by training, which in turn may have a positive effect on reading and spelling abilities (e.g., Peijnenborg et al., 2023).

Methods and Procedures

Participants consisted of a specific group of children with dyslexia and weak working memory skills (n = 62). The effect of Cogmed training on decoding and spelling progress during remediation was investigated using a randomized controlled trial with three research groups (experimental: Cogmed training; active control: fixed computerized training; passive control group).

Outcomes and results

Findings revealed that the Cogmed training enhanced working memory to a rather small extent and that no effects of the Cogmed training on literacy progress occurred over and above the reading and spelling remediation program.

Conclusions and implications

Most likely, Cogmed training does not contribute to literacy development in children with dyslexia. The null results are important information for teachers of this specific group of students, albeit inevitably small samples in intervention studies applied to niche populations increase the risk of type-II errors. Therefore, replication studies are needed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Research in Developmental Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

5.50

自引率

6.50%

发文量

178

期刊介绍： Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.