植物烤肠替代品中的生物胺和细菌腐败

IF 7 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Dominik Dörfel , Sascha Rohn , Eckard Jantzen
{"title":"植物烤肠替代品中的生物胺和细菌腐败","authors":"Dominik Dörfel ,&nbsp;Sascha Rohn ,&nbsp;Eckard Jantzen","doi":"10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Vegan and vegetarian diets are increasing in popularity. Consequently, the supply and demand of plant-based meat alternatives has increased steadily over the past few years. However, scientific research on spoilage processes for such products is still inadequate as compared to research on traditional meat products. In traditional meat products, biogenic amines are prominent spoilage markers and potential sources of food toxicity, especially for people sensitive to biogenic amines. Plant-based meat alternatives are manufactured to mimic the taste, look, texture, and nutritional value of meat, and they have a protein-rich basis. It is therefore hypothesized that biogenic amines could be markers for spoilage in such products as well. Further analysis of their presence and concentrations and comparison to conventional meat products is necessary. If biogenic amines are lower in plant-based meat alternatives, these products are possibly better suited for consumption by people with biogenic amine sensitivities. A simple and rapid extraction method, followed by HILIC-MS/MS separation and detection was therefore developed as a first step and validated for nine biogenic amines in plant-based meat alternatives. This method showed a strong linear correlation between amine concentration and detector response, high accuracy, and precision (&lt; 12 %), as well as high sensitivity, as proven by the lowest limits of quantification (i.e., the lowest concentration within the calibration model) of 1 mg/kg for all analytes, which also compares well with other methods. Subsequently, as part of a pilot spoilage study, the method was applied to one vegetarian and nine vegan grill sausage alternatives during a period of 32 days of open-package storage at refrigerator temperature. Correlations with the results of microbiological testing of the same samples, as well as with the storage time were investigated. However, the results of the correlation analysis showed that biogenic amines are not suitable as spoilage indicators for plant-based meat alternatives, as almost no increase in biogenic amines was identified during the spoilage study for all the samples investigated. Differences in the microbiota of conventional meat products versus plant-based meat alternatives, as well as possibly lower concentrations of free amino acids, are proposed as reasons for biogenic amines not being similarly prevalent, and consequently, not being suitable spoilage markers in plant-based meat alternatives. However, as spoilage of the analyzed products was evident, both via sensory assessment and appearance of mold growth, further targeted and non-targeted research on potential spoilage markers for plant-based meat alternatives is required in the future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":323,"journal":{"name":"Food Research International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biogenic amines and bacterial spoilage in Plant-Based grill sausage alternatives\",\"authors\":\"Dominik Dörfel ,&nbsp;Sascha Rohn ,&nbsp;Eckard Jantzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Vegan and vegetarian diets are increasing in popularity. Consequently, the supply and demand of plant-based meat alternatives has increased steadily over the past few years. However, scientific research on spoilage processes for such products is still inadequate as compared to research on traditional meat products. In traditional meat products, biogenic amines are prominent spoilage markers and potential sources of food toxicity, especially for people sensitive to biogenic amines. Plant-based meat alternatives are manufactured to mimic the taste, look, texture, and nutritional value of meat, and they have a protein-rich basis. It is therefore hypothesized that biogenic amines could be markers for spoilage in such products as well. Further analysis of their presence and concentrations and comparison to conventional meat products is necessary. If biogenic amines are lower in plant-based meat alternatives, these products are possibly better suited for consumption by people with biogenic amine sensitivities. A simple and rapid extraction method, followed by HILIC-MS/MS separation and detection was therefore developed as a first step and validated for nine biogenic amines in plant-based meat alternatives. This method showed a strong linear correlation between amine concentration and detector response, high accuracy, and precision (&lt; 12 %), as well as high sensitivity, as proven by the lowest limits of quantification (i.e., the lowest concentration within the calibration model) of 1 mg/kg for all analytes, which also compares well with other methods. Subsequently, as part of a pilot spoilage study, the method was applied to one vegetarian and nine vegan grill sausage alternatives during a period of 32 days of open-package storage at refrigerator temperature. Correlations with the results of microbiological testing of the same samples, as well as with the storage time were investigated. However, the results of the correlation analysis showed that biogenic amines are not suitable as spoilage indicators for plant-based meat alternatives, as almost no increase in biogenic amines was identified during the spoilage study for all the samples investigated. Differences in the microbiota of conventional meat products versus plant-based meat alternatives, as well as possibly lower concentrations of free amino acids, are proposed as reasons for biogenic amines not being similarly prevalent, and consequently, not being suitable spoilage markers in plant-based meat alternatives. However, as spoilage of the analyzed products was evident, both via sensory assessment and appearance of mold growth, further targeted and non-targeted research on potential spoilage markers for plant-based meat alternatives is required in the future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Research International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996924013358\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Research International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0963996924013358","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

素食和纯素饮食越来越受欢迎。因此,植物肉类替代品的供应和需求在过去几年中稳步增长。然而,与对传统肉类产品的研究相比,对此类产品腐败过程的科学研究仍然不足。在传统肉制品中,生物胺是主要的腐败标志,也是食物毒性的潜在来源,尤其是对生物胺敏感的人群。植物肉类替代品在生产过程中会模仿肉类的味道、外观、质地和营养价值,而且它们含有丰富的蛋白质。因此,我们推测生物胺也可能是这类产品变质的标志。有必要进一步分析生物胺的存在和浓度,并将其与传统肉制品进行比较。如果植物肉类替代品中的生物胺含量较低,那么这些产品可能更适合对生物胺敏感的人食用。因此,我们首先开发了一种简单快速的提取方法,然后用 HILIC-MS/MS 进行分离和检测,并对植物性肉类替代品中的九种生物胺进行了验证。所有分析物的最低定量限(即校准模型内的最低浓度)均为 1 毫克/千克,与其他方法相比也毫不逊色。随后,作为腐败试验研究的一部分,该方法被应用于一种素食和九种素食烤肠替代品,在冰箱温度下开放包装储存 32 天。研究了该方法与相同样品的微生物检测结果以及储存时间之间的相关性。不过,相关性分析的结果表明,生物胺不适合作为植物肉类替代品的腐败指标,因为在腐败研究期间,所有调查样本的生物胺几乎没有增加。传统肉类产品与植物肉类替代品的微生物区系不同,游离氨基酸的浓度也可能较低,这些都是生物胺不普遍的原因,因此也不适合作为植物肉类替代品的腐败指标。不过,由于所分析的产品在感官评估和霉菌生长外观上都有明显的变质现象,因此今后需要对植物基肉类替代品的潜在变质标志物进行进一步有针对性和非针对性的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Biogenic amines and bacterial spoilage in Plant-Based grill sausage alternatives

Biogenic amines and bacterial spoilage in Plant-Based grill sausage alternatives
Vegan and vegetarian diets are increasing in popularity. Consequently, the supply and demand of plant-based meat alternatives has increased steadily over the past few years. However, scientific research on spoilage processes for such products is still inadequate as compared to research on traditional meat products. In traditional meat products, biogenic amines are prominent spoilage markers and potential sources of food toxicity, especially for people sensitive to biogenic amines. Plant-based meat alternatives are manufactured to mimic the taste, look, texture, and nutritional value of meat, and they have a protein-rich basis. It is therefore hypothesized that biogenic amines could be markers for spoilage in such products as well. Further analysis of their presence and concentrations and comparison to conventional meat products is necessary. If biogenic amines are lower in plant-based meat alternatives, these products are possibly better suited for consumption by people with biogenic amine sensitivities. A simple and rapid extraction method, followed by HILIC-MS/MS separation and detection was therefore developed as a first step and validated for nine biogenic amines in plant-based meat alternatives. This method showed a strong linear correlation between amine concentration and detector response, high accuracy, and precision (< 12 %), as well as high sensitivity, as proven by the lowest limits of quantification (i.e., the lowest concentration within the calibration model) of 1 mg/kg for all analytes, which also compares well with other methods. Subsequently, as part of a pilot spoilage study, the method was applied to one vegetarian and nine vegan grill sausage alternatives during a period of 32 days of open-package storage at refrigerator temperature. Correlations with the results of microbiological testing of the same samples, as well as with the storage time were investigated. However, the results of the correlation analysis showed that biogenic amines are not suitable as spoilage indicators for plant-based meat alternatives, as almost no increase in biogenic amines was identified during the spoilage study for all the samples investigated. Differences in the microbiota of conventional meat products versus plant-based meat alternatives, as well as possibly lower concentrations of free amino acids, are proposed as reasons for biogenic amines not being similarly prevalent, and consequently, not being suitable spoilage markers in plant-based meat alternatives. However, as spoilage of the analyzed products was evident, both via sensory assessment and appearance of mold growth, further targeted and non-targeted research on potential spoilage markers for plant-based meat alternatives is required in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Research International
Food Research International 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Food Research International serves as a rapid dissemination platform for significant and impactful research in food science, technology, engineering, and nutrition. The journal focuses on publishing novel, high-quality, and high-impact review papers, original research papers, and letters to the editors across various disciplines in the science and technology of food. Additionally, it follows a policy of publishing special issues on topical and emergent subjects in food research or related areas. Selected, peer-reviewed papers from scientific meetings, workshops, and conferences on the science, technology, and engineering of foods are also featured in special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信