通过白细胞、C 反应蛋白、降钙素原和 D-二聚体区分革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性血流感染:经验性抗生素指南。

IF 2.2 4区 生物学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Jiru Li, Hao Xia
{"title":"通过白细胞、C 反应蛋白、降钙素原和 D-二聚体区分革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性血流感染:经验性抗生素指南。","authors":"Jiru Li, Hao Xia","doi":"10.1093/femsle/fnae091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study aimed to compare the difference of the levels of white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and D-Dimer in the bloodstream infection (BSI) patients, and their values in distinguishing bacterial categories. A total of 847 bloodstream infection patients were analyzed and divided into Gram-positive BSI (GP-BSI) and Gram-negative BSI (GN-BSI) groups. Most frequently isolated pathogens in GP-BSI were Staphylococcus epidermidis (35.75%), followed by Staphylococcus hominis (18.33%), and Streptococcus haemolyticus (10.16%), while in GN-BSI, Escherichia coli (30.07%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.98%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (13.18%) were the most common. The predictive value was evaluated based on three years of patient data, which showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.828. It was further validated using two years of data, which yielded an AUC of 0.925. Significant differences existed in the procalcitonin, D-Dimer, and CRP levels between GN-BSI and GP-BSI. The current results provide a more effective strategy for early differential diagnosis in bacterial categorization of BSI when combining WBC, CRP, procalcitonin, and D-Dimer measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12214,"journal":{"name":"Fems Microbiology Letters","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinguishing Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections through Leukocytes, C-reactive protein, Procalcitonin, and D-Dimer: An Empirical Antibiotic Guidance.\",\"authors\":\"Jiru Li, Hao Xia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/femsle/fnae091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This retrospective study aimed to compare the difference of the levels of white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and D-Dimer in the bloodstream infection (BSI) patients, and their values in distinguishing bacterial categories. A total of 847 bloodstream infection patients were analyzed and divided into Gram-positive BSI (GP-BSI) and Gram-negative BSI (GN-BSI) groups. Most frequently isolated pathogens in GP-BSI were Staphylococcus epidermidis (35.75%), followed by Staphylococcus hominis (18.33%), and Streptococcus haemolyticus (10.16%), while in GN-BSI, Escherichia coli (30.07%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.98%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (13.18%) were the most common. The predictive value was evaluated based on three years of patient data, which showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.828. It was further validated using two years of data, which yielded an AUC of 0.925. Significant differences existed in the procalcitonin, D-Dimer, and CRP levels between GN-BSI and GP-BSI. The current results provide a more effective strategy for early differential diagnosis in bacterial categorization of BSI when combining WBC, CRP, procalcitonin, and D-Dimer measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fems Microbiology Letters\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fems Microbiology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnae091\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fems Microbiology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnae091","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项回顾性研究旨在比较血流感染(BSI)患者的白细胞(WBC)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原和 D-二聚体水平的差异,以及它们在区分细菌类别方面的价值。共对 847 名血流感染患者进行了分析,并将其分为革兰氏阳性 BSI(GP-BSI)和革兰氏阴性 BSI(GN-BSI)两组。在 GP-BSI 中,最常分离出的病原体是表皮葡萄球菌(35.75%),其次是人葡萄球菌(18.33%)和溶血性链球菌(10.16%);而在 GN-BSI 中,最常见的病原体是大肠埃希菌(30.07%)、肺炎克雷伯菌(23.98%)和鲍曼不动杆菌(13.18%)。根据三年的患者数据对预测值进行了评估,结果显示曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.828。使用两年的数据对其进行了进一步验证,得出的 AUC 为 0.925。GN-BSI 和 GP-BSI 的降钙素原、D-二聚体和 CRP 水平存在显著差异。目前的结果为结合白细胞、CRP、降钙素原和 D-Dimer 测量结果对 BSI 细菌分类进行早期鉴别诊断提供了更有效的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distinguishing Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections through Leukocytes, C-reactive protein, Procalcitonin, and D-Dimer: An Empirical Antibiotic Guidance.

This retrospective study aimed to compare the difference of the levels of white blood cells (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and D-Dimer in the bloodstream infection (BSI) patients, and their values in distinguishing bacterial categories. A total of 847 bloodstream infection patients were analyzed and divided into Gram-positive BSI (GP-BSI) and Gram-negative BSI (GN-BSI) groups. Most frequently isolated pathogens in GP-BSI were Staphylococcus epidermidis (35.75%), followed by Staphylococcus hominis (18.33%), and Streptococcus haemolyticus (10.16%), while in GN-BSI, Escherichia coli (30.07%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.98%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (13.18%) were the most common. The predictive value was evaluated based on three years of patient data, which showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.828. It was further validated using two years of data, which yielded an AUC of 0.925. Significant differences existed in the procalcitonin, D-Dimer, and CRP levels between GN-BSI and GP-BSI. The current results provide a more effective strategy for early differential diagnosis in bacterial categorization of BSI when combining WBC, CRP, procalcitonin, and D-Dimer measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fems Microbiology Letters
Fems Microbiology Letters 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: FEMS Microbiology Letters gives priority to concise papers that merit rapid publication by virtue of their originality, general interest and contribution to new developments in microbiology. All aspects of microbiology, including virology, are covered. 2019 Impact Factor: 1.987, Journal Citation Reports (Source Clarivate, 2020) Ranking: 98/135 (Microbiology) The journal is divided into eight Sections: Physiology and Biochemistry (including genetics, molecular biology and ‘omic’ studies) Food Microbiology (from food production and biotechnology to spoilage and food borne pathogens) Biotechnology and Synthetic Biology Pathogens and Pathogenicity (including medical, veterinary, plant and insect pathogens – particularly those relating to food security – with the exception of viruses) Environmental Microbiology (including ecophysiology, ecogenomics and meta-omic studies) Virology (viruses infecting any organism, including Bacteria and Archaea) Taxonomy and Systematics (for publication of novel taxa, taxonomic reclassifications and reviews of a taxonomic nature) Professional Development (including education, training, CPD, research assessment frameworks, research and publication metrics, best-practice, careers and history of microbiology) If you are unsure which Section is most appropriate for your manuscript, for example in the case of transdisciplinary studies, we recommend that you contact the Editor-In-Chief by email prior to submission. Our scope includes any type of microorganism - all members of the Bacteria and the Archaea and microbial members of the Eukarya (yeasts, filamentous fungi, microbial algae, protozoa, oomycetes, myxomycetes, etc.) as well as all viruses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信