[利用定量核磁共振法对 Paralepistopsis acromelalga 中的氯替丁进行定量]。

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Yoshitaka Ishida, Yuka Nagaoka
{"title":"[利用定量核磁共振法对 Paralepistopsis acromelalga 中的氯替丁进行定量]。","authors":"Yoshitaka Ishida, Yuka Nagaoka","doi":"10.3358/shokueishi.65.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because one toxic component of Paralepistopsis acromelalga, clitidine, is not commercially available as a reagent and because standards are difficult to obtain, a quantitative NMR method that requires no standard was investigated for this study. To compare the quantitative values obtained using the two methods, the absolute purity of the standard used for the LC-MS/MS method was calculated using quantitative NMR. The result was calculated as 89.8±1.5%: more than 10% lower than the result obtained using conventional HPLC purity. This finding is presumably attributable to the presence of water in the crystals. Calculating the absolute purity of the product before use is crucially important. The values of the Paralepistopsis acromelalga fruit extract were quantified and compared using conventional LC-MS/MS and quantitative NMR. The quantitative values did not differ significantly, suggesting that, in most cases, they were within a 5% margin of error. Furthermore, quantitative NMR provides several benefits not obtained using conventional methods, including its rapid measurement capability and its obviation of the need for a reference material for the measured substance. By virtue of these benefits, quantitative NMR is an extremely useful tool for natural toxin analysis where sudden outbreaks occur and for which rapid calculation of results is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":54373,"journal":{"name":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","volume":"65 4","pages":"84-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Quantification of Clitidine in Paralepistopsis acromelalga Using Quantitative NMR Method].\",\"authors\":\"Yoshitaka Ishida, Yuka Nagaoka\",\"doi\":\"10.3358/shokueishi.65.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Because one toxic component of Paralepistopsis acromelalga, clitidine, is not commercially available as a reagent and because standards are difficult to obtain, a quantitative NMR method that requires no standard was investigated for this study. To compare the quantitative values obtained using the two methods, the absolute purity of the standard used for the LC-MS/MS method was calculated using quantitative NMR. The result was calculated as 89.8±1.5%: more than 10% lower than the result obtained using conventional HPLC purity. This finding is presumably attributable to the presence of water in the crystals. Calculating the absolute purity of the product before use is crucially important. The values of the Paralepistopsis acromelalga fruit extract were quantified and compared using conventional LC-MS/MS and quantitative NMR. The quantitative values did not differ significantly, suggesting that, in most cases, they were within a 5% margin of error. Furthermore, quantitative NMR provides several benefits not obtained using conventional methods, including its rapid measurement capability and its obviation of the need for a reference material for the measured substance. By virtue of these benefits, quantitative NMR is an extremely useful tool for natural toxin analysis where sudden outbreaks occur and for which rapid calculation of results is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Hygiene and Safety Science\",\"volume\":\"65 4\",\"pages\":\"84-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Hygiene and Safety Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.65.84\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.65.84","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于 Paralepistopsis acromelalga 的一种有毒成分氯替丁无法作为试剂在市场上销售,而且标准品也很难获得,因此本研究采用了一种无需标准品的 NMR 定量方法。为了比较两种方法获得的定量值,使用定量 NMR 计算了用于 LC-MS/MS 方法的标准品的绝对纯度。计算结果为 89.8±1.5%:比使用传统 HPLC 纯度得出的结果低 10%以上。这一结果可能是由于晶体中含有水分。在使用前计算产品的绝对纯度至关重要。使用传统的 LC-MS/MS 和定量 NMR 对 Paralepistopsis acromelalga 果实提取物进行了定量和比较。定量值差异不大,表明在大多数情况下,它们的误差在 5%以内。此外,定量 NMR 还具有一些传统方法无法实现的优点,包括快速测量能力和无需为所测物质提供参考材料。由于这些优点,定量核磁共振是一种非常有用的天然毒素分析工具,适用于需要快速计算结果的突发疫情分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Quantification of Clitidine in Paralepistopsis acromelalga Using Quantitative NMR Method].

Because one toxic component of Paralepistopsis acromelalga, clitidine, is not commercially available as a reagent and because standards are difficult to obtain, a quantitative NMR method that requires no standard was investigated for this study. To compare the quantitative values obtained using the two methods, the absolute purity of the standard used for the LC-MS/MS method was calculated using quantitative NMR. The result was calculated as 89.8±1.5%: more than 10% lower than the result obtained using conventional HPLC purity. This finding is presumably attributable to the presence of water in the crystals. Calculating the absolute purity of the product before use is crucially important. The values of the Paralepistopsis acromelalga fruit extract were quantified and compared using conventional LC-MS/MS and quantitative NMR. The quantitative values did not differ significantly, suggesting that, in most cases, they were within a 5% margin of error. Furthermore, quantitative NMR provides several benefits not obtained using conventional methods, including its rapid measurement capability and its obviation of the need for a reference material for the measured substance. By virtue of these benefits, quantitative NMR is an extremely useful tool for natural toxin analysis where sudden outbreaks occur and for which rapid calculation of results is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Hygiene and Safety Science
Food Hygiene and Safety Science Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信