临床药剂师驱动的周末抗菌药物管理覆盖对一家四级医院的影响。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hazem Elrefaei, Wasim S El Nekidy, Rama Nasef, Manal Motasem, Yara Mkarim, Osama Al Quteimat, Mohamed Hisham, Rami Ismail, Emna Abidi, Claude Afif, Rania El Lababidi
{"title":"临床药剂师驱动的周末抗菌药物管理覆盖对一家四级医院的影响。","authors":"Hazem Elrefaei, Wasim S El Nekidy, Rama Nasef, Manal Motasem, Yara Mkarim, Osama Al Quteimat, Mohamed Hisham, Rami Ismail, Emna Abidi, Claude Afif, Rania El Lababidi","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13100974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Extending a consistent pharmacy antimicrobial stewardship weekend service was a newly implemented initiative. We sought to evaluate the impact of incorporating an Infectious Diseases (ID)-trained clinical pharmacist into an antimicrobial stewardship program (AMS) during weekends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of documented interventions was 451 on 362 patients compared to 115 interventions on 108 patients during the pre-implementation period (<i>p</i> = 0.04), with interventions primarily targeting Watch antibiotics, as classified by the WHO AWaRe classification. A reduction in the LOS was observed, with a median of 16 days (8-34) during the post-implementation period compared to 27.5 days (10-56) during the pre-implementation period (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The median DOT increased during the post-implementation period to 8 (6-11), versus the increase to 7 (4-11) during the pre-implementation period (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). Finally, there was no significant difference observed in healthcare-associated CDI and infection-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study. Data including the documented pharmacist interventions were collected from the electronic medical record (EMR), the pre-implementation phase was in 2020, and post-implementation was in 2021. The primary outcome was to identify the number of AMS interventions through prospective audit and feedback review analysis. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), length of hospital stay (LOS), healthcare-associated <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI), and infection-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pharmacist-driven weekend AMS is an opportunity for pharmacists to intervene and optimize patients' care plans. This initiative demonstrated significant increased AMS-related interventions, promoted judicious antimicrobial use, and contributed to a reduced length of hospital stay. Our findings need to be replicated in a larger prospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Clinical Pharmacist-Driven Weekend Antimicrobial Stewardship Coverage at a Quaternary Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Hazem Elrefaei, Wasim S El Nekidy, Rama Nasef, Manal Motasem, Yara Mkarim, Osama Al Quteimat, Mohamed Hisham, Rami Ismail, Emna Abidi, Claude Afif, Rania El Lababidi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13100974\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Extending a consistent pharmacy antimicrobial stewardship weekend service was a newly implemented initiative. We sought to evaluate the impact of incorporating an Infectious Diseases (ID)-trained clinical pharmacist into an antimicrobial stewardship program (AMS) during weekends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of documented interventions was 451 on 362 patients compared to 115 interventions on 108 patients during the pre-implementation period (<i>p</i> = 0.04), with interventions primarily targeting Watch antibiotics, as classified by the WHO AWaRe classification. A reduction in the LOS was observed, with a median of 16 days (8-34) during the post-implementation period compared to 27.5 days (10-56) during the pre-implementation period (<i>p</i> = 0.001). The median DOT increased during the post-implementation period to 8 (6-11), versus the increase to 7 (4-11) during the pre-implementation period (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). Finally, there was no significant difference observed in healthcare-associated CDI and infection-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study. Data including the documented pharmacist interventions were collected from the electronic medical record (EMR), the pre-implementation phase was in 2020, and post-implementation was in 2021. The primary outcome was to identify the number of AMS interventions through prospective audit and feedback review analysis. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), length of hospital stay (LOS), healthcare-associated <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI), and infection-related readmission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pharmacist-driven weekend AMS is an opportunity for pharmacists to intervene and optimize patients' care plans. This initiative demonstrated significant increased AMS-related interventions, promoted judicious antimicrobial use, and contributed to a reduced length of hospital stay. Our findings need to be replicated in a larger prospective study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504531/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100974\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100974","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:扩展药房抗菌药物管理周末服务是一项新实施的举措。我们试图评估在周末将一名经过传染病(ID)培训的临床药剂师纳入抗菌药物管理计划(AMS)的影响:有记录的干预次数为 451 次,涉及 362 名患者,而实施前为 115 次,涉及 108 名患者(p = 0.04),干预主要针对世界卫生组织 AWaRe 分类中的观察抗生素。据观察,住院时间有所缩短,实施后的中位数为 16 天(8-34 天),而实施前为 27.5 天(10-56 天)(p = 0.001)。实施后的 DOT 中位数增至 8 天(6-11 天),而实施前为 7 天(4-11 天)(p ≤ 0.001)。最后,在医源性 CDI 和感染相关再入院方面没有观察到明显差异:这是一项回顾性的单中心、前-后准实验研究。从电子病历(EMR)中收集了包括药剂师干预记录在内的数据,实施前阶段为 2020 年,实施后阶段为 2021 年。主要结果是通过前瞻性审计和反馈审查分析确定 AMS 干预的数量。次要结果包括抗生素治疗天数(DOT)、住院时间(LOS)、医源性艰难梭菌感染(CDI)和感染相关再入院率:药剂师主导的周末 AMS 为药剂师提供了干预和优化患者护理计划的机会。这一举措显著增加了 AMS 相关干预措施,促进了抗菌药物的合理使用,并有助于缩短住院时间。我们的研究结果需要在更大规模的前瞻性研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Clinical Pharmacist-Driven Weekend Antimicrobial Stewardship Coverage at a Quaternary Hospital.

Background and objective: Extending a consistent pharmacy antimicrobial stewardship weekend service was a newly implemented initiative. We sought to evaluate the impact of incorporating an Infectious Diseases (ID)-trained clinical pharmacist into an antimicrobial stewardship program (AMS) during weekends.

Results: The number of documented interventions was 451 on 362 patients compared to 115 interventions on 108 patients during the pre-implementation period (p = 0.04), with interventions primarily targeting Watch antibiotics, as classified by the WHO AWaRe classification. A reduction in the LOS was observed, with a median of 16 days (8-34) during the post-implementation period compared to 27.5 days (10-56) during the pre-implementation period (p = 0.001). The median DOT increased during the post-implementation period to 8 (6-11), versus the increase to 7 (4-11) during the pre-implementation period (p ≤ 0.001). Finally, there was no significant difference observed in healthcare-associated CDI and infection-related readmission.

Methods: This is a retrospective single-center, pre-post quasi-experimental study. Data including the documented pharmacist interventions were collected from the electronic medical record (EMR), the pre-implementation phase was in 2020, and post-implementation was in 2021. The primary outcome was to identify the number of AMS interventions through prospective audit and feedback review analysis. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic days of therapy (DOT), length of hospital stay (LOS), healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), and infection-related readmission.

Conclusions: The pharmacist-driven weekend AMS is an opportunity for pharmacists to intervene and optimize patients' care plans. This initiative demonstrated significant increased AMS-related interventions, promoted judicious antimicrobial use, and contributed to a reduced length of hospital stay. Our findings need to be replicated in a larger prospective study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信