缩短留置时间能否减少与使用脐带导管有关的感染并发症?

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Martina Buttera, Lucia Corso, Leonardo Casadei, Cinzia Valenza, Francesca Sforza, Francesco Candia, Francesca Miselli, Cecilia Baraldi, Licia Lugli, Alberto Berardi, Lorenzo Iughetti
{"title":"缩短留置时间能否减少与使用脐带导管有关的感染并发症?","authors":"Martina Buttera, Lucia Corso, Leonardo Casadei, Cinzia Valenza, Francesca Sforza, Francesco Candia, Francesca Miselli, Cecilia Baraldi, Licia Lugli, Alberto Berardi, Lorenzo Iughetti","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) are the standard of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to administer fluids, parenteral nutrition and medications, although complications may occur, including central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs). However, the dwell time to reduce CLABSI risk remains an open issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective study of newborns hospitalized in the Modena NICU with at least one UVC inserted over a 6-year period (period 1: January 2011-December 2013; period 2: January 2019-December 2021). We selected a non-consecutive 6-year period to emphasize the differences in UVC management practices that have occurred over time in our NICU. The UVC dwell time and catheter-related complications during the first 4 weeks of life were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UVC dwell time was shorter in period 2 (median 4 days vs. 5 days, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Between the two periods, the incidence of CLABSIs remained unchanged (<i>p =</i> 0.5425). However, in period 2, there was an increased need for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) after UVC removal, with a rise in PICC infections after UVC removal (<i>p =</i> 0.0239).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our NICU, shortening UVC dwell time from 5 to 4 days did not decrease the UVC-related complications. Instead, the earlier removal of UVCs led to a higher number of PICCs inserted, possibly increasing the overall infectious risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":54246,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics-Basel","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can a Shorter Dwell Time Reduce Infective Complications Associated with the Use of Umbilical Catheters?\",\"authors\":\"Martina Buttera, Lucia Corso, Leonardo Casadei, Cinzia Valenza, Francesca Sforza, Francesco Candia, Francesca Miselli, Cecilia Baraldi, Licia Lugli, Alberto Berardi, Lorenzo Iughetti\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13100988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) are the standard of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to administer fluids, parenteral nutrition and medications, although complications may occur, including central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs). However, the dwell time to reduce CLABSI risk remains an open issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a single-center retrospective study of newborns hospitalized in the Modena NICU with at least one UVC inserted over a 6-year period (period 1: January 2011-December 2013; period 2: January 2019-December 2021). We selected a non-consecutive 6-year period to emphasize the differences in UVC management practices that have occurred over time in our NICU. The UVC dwell time and catheter-related complications during the first 4 weeks of life were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The UVC dwell time was shorter in period 2 (median 4 days vs. 5 days, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). Between the two periods, the incidence of CLABSIs remained unchanged (<i>p =</i> 0.5425). However, in period 2, there was an increased need for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) after UVC removal, with a rise in PICC infections after UVC removal (<i>p =</i> 0.0239).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our NICU, shortening UVC dwell time from 5 to 4 days did not decrease the UVC-related complications. Instead, the earlier removal of UVCs led to a higher number of PICCs inserted, possibly increasing the overall infectious risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504672/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics-Basel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100988\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13100988","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脐静脉导管(UVC)是新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)输液、肠外营养和用药的标准护理方法,但也可能出现并发症,包括中心静脉相关性血流感染(CLABSI)。然而,减少 CLABSI 风险的停留时间仍是一个悬而未决的问题:我们对在摩德纳新生儿重症监护室住院的新生儿进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象为 6 年内至少插入过一次 UVC 的新生儿(第一阶段:2011 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月;第二阶段:2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月)。我们选择了一个非连续的 6 年期,以强调随着时间的推移,我们的新生儿重症监护室在紫外线管理方法上出现的差异。我们对新生儿出生后 4 周内的紫外线停留时间和导管相关并发症进行了研究:结果:第 2 阶段的紫外线停留时间较短(中位数为 4 天 vs. 5 天,p < 0.00001)。两个阶段之间,CLABSIs 的发生率保持不变(p = 0.5425)。然而,在第二阶段,移除紫外线后外周插入中心导管(PICC)的需求增加,移除紫外线后 PICC 感染率上升(p = 0.0239):在我们的新生儿重症监护室,将紫外线驻留时间从 5 天缩短至 4 天并没有减少紫外线相关并发症。结论:在我们的新生儿重症监护室,将紫外线照射时间从 5 天缩短到 4 天并没有减少紫外线照射相关并发症,相反,提前移除紫外线照射器导致插入的 PICC 数量增加,可能会增加整体感染风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can a Shorter Dwell Time Reduce Infective Complications Associated with the Use of Umbilical Catheters?

Background: Umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) are the standard of care in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) to administer fluids, parenteral nutrition and medications, although complications may occur, including central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs). However, the dwell time to reduce CLABSI risk remains an open issue.

Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective study of newborns hospitalized in the Modena NICU with at least one UVC inserted over a 6-year period (period 1: January 2011-December 2013; period 2: January 2019-December 2021). We selected a non-consecutive 6-year period to emphasize the differences in UVC management practices that have occurred over time in our NICU. The UVC dwell time and catheter-related complications during the first 4 weeks of life were examined.

Results: The UVC dwell time was shorter in period 2 (median 4 days vs. 5 days, p < 0.00001). Between the two periods, the incidence of CLABSIs remained unchanged (p = 0.5425). However, in period 2, there was an increased need for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) after UVC removal, with a rise in PICC infections after UVC removal (p = 0.0239).

Conclusions: In our NICU, shortening UVC dwell time from 5 to 4 days did not decrease the UVC-related complications. Instead, the earlier removal of UVCs led to a higher number of PICCs inserted, possibly increasing the overall infectious risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotics-Basel
Antibiotics-Basel Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.60%
发文量
1547
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Antibiotics (ISSN 2079-6382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of antibiotics. Antibiotics is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing the general fields of biochemistry, chemistry, genetics, microbiology and pharmacology. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信