多位数触摸 II:整合过程中的知觉加权遵循手指前端优先。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1152/jn.00105.2024
Shinya Takamuku, Irena Arslanova, Hiroaki Gomi, Patrick Haggard
{"title":"多位数触摸 II:整合过程中的知觉加权遵循手指前端优先。","authors":"Shinya Takamuku, Irena Arslanova, Hiroaki Gomi, Patrick Haggard","doi":"10.1152/jn.00105.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When we run our hand across a surface, each finger typically repeats the sensory stimulation that the leading finger has already experienced. Because of this redundancy, the leading finger may attract more attention and contribute more strongly when tactile signals are integrated across fingers to form an overall percept. To test this hypothesis, we re-analyzed data collected in a previous study (Arslanova I, Takamuku S, Gomi H, Haggard P, <i>J Neurophysiol</i> 128: 418-433, 2022), where two probes were moved in different directions on two different fingerpads and participants reported the probes' average direction. Here, we evaluate the relative contribution of each finger to the percept and examine whether multidigit integration gives priority to the leading finger. Although the hand actually remained static in these experiments, a \"functional leading finger\" could be defined with reference to the average direction of the stimuli and the direction of hand-object relative motion that this implied. When participants averaged the motion direction across fingers of the same hand, the leading finger received a higher weighting than the nonleading finger, even though this biased estimate of average direction. Importantly, this bias disappeared when averaging motion direction across the two hands. Both the reported average direction and its systematic relation to the difference between the individual stimulus directions were explained by a model of motion integration in which the sensory weighting of stimuli depends on the directions of the applied stimuli. Our finding supports the hypothesis that the leading finger, which often receives novel information in natural hand-object interactions, is prioritized in forming our tactile perception.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The capacity of the tactile system to process multiple simultaneous stimuli is restricted. One solution could be to prioritize input from more informative sources. Here, we show that sensory weighting accorded to each finger during multidigit touch is biased in a direction-dependent manner when different motions are delivered to the fingers of the same hand. We argue that tactile inputs are weighted based on purely geometric information to prioritize \"novel\" information from the leading finger.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1805-1819"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidigit tactile perception II: perceptual weighting during integration follows a leading-finger priority.\",\"authors\":\"Shinya Takamuku, Irena Arslanova, Hiroaki Gomi, Patrick Haggard\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00105.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When we run our hand across a surface, each finger typically repeats the sensory stimulation that the leading finger has already experienced. Because of this redundancy, the leading finger may attract more attention and contribute more strongly when tactile signals are integrated across fingers to form an overall percept. To test this hypothesis, we re-analyzed data collected in a previous study (Arslanova I, Takamuku S, Gomi H, Haggard P, <i>J Neurophysiol</i> 128: 418-433, 2022), where two probes were moved in different directions on two different fingerpads and participants reported the probes' average direction. Here, we evaluate the relative contribution of each finger to the percept and examine whether multidigit integration gives priority to the leading finger. Although the hand actually remained static in these experiments, a \\\"functional leading finger\\\" could be defined with reference to the average direction of the stimuli and the direction of hand-object relative motion that this implied. When participants averaged the motion direction across fingers of the same hand, the leading finger received a higher weighting than the nonleading finger, even though this biased estimate of average direction. Importantly, this bias disappeared when averaging motion direction across the two hands. Both the reported average direction and its systematic relation to the difference between the individual stimulus directions were explained by a model of motion integration in which the sensory weighting of stimuli depends on the directions of the applied stimuli. Our finding supports the hypothesis that the leading finger, which often receives novel information in natural hand-object interactions, is prioritized in forming our tactile perception.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> The capacity of the tactile system to process multiple simultaneous stimuli is restricted. One solution could be to prioritize input from more informative sources. Here, we show that sensory weighting accorded to each finger during multidigit touch is biased in a direction-dependent manner when different motions are delivered to the fingers of the same hand. We argue that tactile inputs are weighted based on purely geometric information to prioritize \\\"novel\\\" information from the leading finger.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1805-1819\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00105.2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00105.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当我们用手划过一个表面时,每个手指通常都会重复前面手指已经经历过的感官刺激。由于这种冗余性,当各手指的触觉信号整合在一起形成整体感知时,领先的手指可能会吸引更多的注意力,并做出更有力的贡献。为了验证这一假设,我们重新分析了之前一项研究(Arsanova 等人,1)中收集的数据,在这项研究中,两个探针在两个不同的指垫上向不同的方向移动,参与者报告探针的平均方向。在这里,我们评估了每个手指对感知的相对贡献,并研究了多位数整合是否优先考虑前指。虽然在这些实验中,手实际上是静止的,但 "功能性主导手指 "的定义可以参考刺激物的平均方向,以及这意味着的手与物体的相对运动方向。当参与者对同一只手的各个手指的运动方向进行平均时,领先手指的权重高于非领先手指,尽管这对平均方向的估计存在偏差。重要的是,在对两只手的运动方向进行平均时,这种偏差消失了。报告的平均方向及其与单个刺激方向之间差异的系统关系都可以用运动整合模型来解释,在该模型中,刺激的感觉权重取决于所应用刺激的方向。我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即在自然的手与物体的互动中,前指经常接收到新信息,在形成触觉感知时,前指被优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidigit tactile perception II: perceptual weighting during integration follows a leading-finger priority.

When we run our hand across a surface, each finger typically repeats the sensory stimulation that the leading finger has already experienced. Because of this redundancy, the leading finger may attract more attention and contribute more strongly when tactile signals are integrated across fingers to form an overall percept. To test this hypothesis, we re-analyzed data collected in a previous study (Arslanova I, Takamuku S, Gomi H, Haggard P, J Neurophysiol 128: 418-433, 2022), where two probes were moved in different directions on two different fingerpads and participants reported the probes' average direction. Here, we evaluate the relative contribution of each finger to the percept and examine whether multidigit integration gives priority to the leading finger. Although the hand actually remained static in these experiments, a "functional leading finger" could be defined with reference to the average direction of the stimuli and the direction of hand-object relative motion that this implied. When participants averaged the motion direction across fingers of the same hand, the leading finger received a higher weighting than the nonleading finger, even though this biased estimate of average direction. Importantly, this bias disappeared when averaging motion direction across the two hands. Both the reported average direction and its systematic relation to the difference between the individual stimulus directions were explained by a model of motion integration in which the sensory weighting of stimuli depends on the directions of the applied stimuli. Our finding supports the hypothesis that the leading finger, which often receives novel information in natural hand-object interactions, is prioritized in forming our tactile perception.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The capacity of the tactile system to process multiple simultaneous stimuli is restricted. One solution could be to prioritize input from more informative sources. Here, we show that sensory weighting accorded to each finger during multidigit touch is biased in a direction-dependent manner when different motions are delivered to the fingers of the same hand. We argue that tactile inputs are weighted based on purely geometric information to prioritize "novel" information from the leading finger.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信