老年人滥用非处方药的高发性和复杂性。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-09-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae083
Jason S Chladek, Aaron M Gilson, Jamie A Stone, Maria E Berbakov, Taylor L Watterson, Elin C Lehnbom, Emily L Hoffins, Katherine A Hemesath, Jukrin Moon, Lauren L Welch, Denise L Walbrandt Pigarelli, Edward C Portillo, Stephanie M Resendiz, Shiying Mai, Michelle A Chui
{"title":"老年人滥用非处方药的高发性和复杂性。","authors":"Jason S Chladek, Aaron M Gilson, Jamie A Stone, Maria E Berbakov, Taylor L Watterson, Elin C Lehnbom, Emily L Hoffins, Katherine A Hemesath, Jukrin Moon, Lauren L Welch, Denise L Walbrandt Pigarelli, Edward C Portillo, Stephanie M Resendiz, Shiying Mai, Michelle A Chui","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older adults (≥65 years) are the largest consumers of over-the-counter (OTC) medications and exceptionally vulnerable to the risks of these medications, including adverse drug events (ADEs). However, little is known about how older adults select and use OTCs. This is the first multisite study designed to prospectively quantify the type and intended use of OTCs selected by older adults in community pharmacies where products are purchased.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Older adults (<i>n</i> = 144) were recruited from 10 community pharmacies from a Midwestern health system. Participants were given hypothetical symptoms and asked to select one or more OTCs for self-treatment. They were asked to report how they would use the products at symptom onset and when symptoms persisted or worsened. They also reported their current medication list and health conditions. Participants' OTC selections were evaluated for 4 types of misuse: drug-age, drug-drug, drug-disease, and drug-label.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 144 participants, 114 (79%) demonstrated at least one type of misuse when describing how they would use their OTC selections at symptom onset. Drug-drug and drug-label misuse had the highest prevalence. Overall, 26 (18%) and 28 (19%) participants showed only drug-drug or drug-label misuse, respectively. Notably, 55 (38%) of participants demonstrated misuse in 2 or more misuse categories. Misuse potential was exacerbated when participants described treating persistent or worsening symptoms.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The results highlight the high prevalence and complexity of OTC misuse in older adults and the need for additional work to improve OTC safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 10","pages":"igae083"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The High Prevalence and Complexity of Over-the-Counter Medication Misuse in Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Jason S Chladek, Aaron M Gilson, Jamie A Stone, Maria E Berbakov, Taylor L Watterson, Elin C Lehnbom, Emily L Hoffins, Katherine A Hemesath, Jukrin Moon, Lauren L Welch, Denise L Walbrandt Pigarelli, Edward C Portillo, Stephanie M Resendiz, Shiying Mai, Michelle A Chui\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older adults (≥65 years) are the largest consumers of over-the-counter (OTC) medications and exceptionally vulnerable to the risks of these medications, including adverse drug events (ADEs). However, little is known about how older adults select and use OTCs. This is the first multisite study designed to prospectively quantify the type and intended use of OTCs selected by older adults in community pharmacies where products are purchased.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Older adults (<i>n</i> = 144) were recruited from 10 community pharmacies from a Midwestern health system. Participants were given hypothetical symptoms and asked to select one or more OTCs for self-treatment. They were asked to report how they would use the products at symptom onset and when symptoms persisted or worsened. They also reported their current medication list and health conditions. Participants' OTC selections were evaluated for 4 types of misuse: drug-age, drug-drug, drug-disease, and drug-label.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 144 participants, 114 (79%) demonstrated at least one type of misuse when describing how they would use their OTC selections at symptom onset. Drug-drug and drug-label misuse had the highest prevalence. Overall, 26 (18%) and 28 (19%) participants showed only drug-drug or drug-label misuse, respectively. Notably, 55 (38%) of participants demonstrated misuse in 2 or more misuse categories. Misuse potential was exacerbated when participants described treating persistent or worsening symptoms.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The results highlight the high prevalence and complexity of OTC misuse in older adults and the need for additional work to improve OTC safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"igae083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae083\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:老年人(≥65 岁)是非处方药 (OTC) 的最大消费者,也极易遭受这些药物的风险,包括药物不良事件 (ADE)。然而,人们对老年人如何选择和使用非处方药却知之甚少。这是第一项多地点研究,旨在前瞻性地量化老年人在社区药房购买产品时所选择的非处方药的类型和预期用途:从中西部医疗系统的 10 家社区药房招募老年人(n = 144)。向参与者提供假设症状,要求他们选择一种或多种非处方药进行自我治疗。要求他们报告在症状出现时以及症状持续或恶化时如何使用这些产品。他们还报告了自己目前的用药清单和健康状况。对参与者选择的非处方药进行了4种滥用类型的评估:药物-年龄、药物-药物、药物-疾病和药物-标签:结果:在 144 名参与者中,有 114 人(79%)在描述症状发作时如何使用他们选择的非处方药时,至少有一种类型的滥用。药物-药物和药物标签滥用的发生率最高。总体而言,分别有 26 人(18%)和 28 人(19%)只表现出药物-药物或药物标签滥用。值得注意的是,55 名参与者(38%)表现出两种或两种以上类别的滥用。当参与者描述治疗持续或恶化的症状时,滥用的可能性就会加剧:讨论与启示:研究结果凸显了老年人滥用非处方药的普遍性和复杂性,以及提高非处方药安全性的其他工作的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The High Prevalence and Complexity of Over-the-Counter Medication Misuse in Older Adults.

Background and objectives: Older adults (≥65 years) are the largest consumers of over-the-counter (OTC) medications and exceptionally vulnerable to the risks of these medications, including adverse drug events (ADEs). However, little is known about how older adults select and use OTCs. This is the first multisite study designed to prospectively quantify the type and intended use of OTCs selected by older adults in community pharmacies where products are purchased.

Research design and methods: Older adults (n = 144) were recruited from 10 community pharmacies from a Midwestern health system. Participants were given hypothetical symptoms and asked to select one or more OTCs for self-treatment. They were asked to report how they would use the products at symptom onset and when symptoms persisted or worsened. They also reported their current medication list and health conditions. Participants' OTC selections were evaluated for 4 types of misuse: drug-age, drug-drug, drug-disease, and drug-label.

Results: Of the 144 participants, 114 (79%) demonstrated at least one type of misuse when describing how they would use their OTC selections at symptom onset. Drug-drug and drug-label misuse had the highest prevalence. Overall, 26 (18%) and 28 (19%) participants showed only drug-drug or drug-label misuse, respectively. Notably, 55 (38%) of participants demonstrated misuse in 2 or more misuse categories. Misuse potential was exacerbated when participants described treating persistent or worsening symptoms.

Discussion and implications: The results highlight the high prevalence and complexity of OTC misuse in older adults and the need for additional work to improve OTC safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信