抗氧化剂化合物与乙氧基喹对初生肉鸡饲料氧化稳定性、生产性能、抗氧化能力和肠道健康影响的比较研究

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Yong Xiao, Xuyang Gao, Jianmin Yuan
{"title":"抗氧化剂化合物与乙氧基喹对初生肉鸡饲料氧化稳定性、生产性能、抗氧化能力和肠道健康影响的比较研究","authors":"Yong Xiao, Xuyang Gao, Jianmin Yuan","doi":"10.3390/antiox13101229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concerns over the safety of ethoxyquin (EQ) highlight the need for safer, more effective feed antioxidants. This study investigated a healthier antioxidant compound (AC) as a potential alternative to EQ in broilers. A total of 351 one-day-old Arbor Acres Plus male broilers were randomly assigned to three treatments for 21 days: control (CON), EQ group (200 g/ton EQ at 60% purity), and AC group (200 g/ton AC containing 18% butylated hydroxytoluene, 3% citric acid, and 1% tertiary butylhydroquinone). AC supplementation reduced the acid value, peroxide value, and malondialdehyde content in stored feed, decreased feed intake and the feed conversion ratio without affecting body weight gain, and enhanced antioxidant capacity (liver total antioxidant capacity and superoxide dismutase; intestinal catalase and glutathione peroxidase 7). It improved intestinal morphology and decreased barrier permeability (lower diamine oxidase and D-lactate), potentially by promoting ZO-1, Occludin, and Mucin2 expression. The AC also upregulated NF-κB p50 and its inhibitor (NF-κB p105), enhancing immune regulation. Additionally, the AC tended to increase beneficial gut microbiota, including <i>Lactobacillus</i>, and reduced <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Corprococcus</i>, and <i>Anaeroplasma</i>. Compared to EQ, the AC further enhanced feed oxidative stability, the feed conversion ratio, intestinal morphology and barrier functions, and inflammatory status, suggesting its potential as a superior alternative to EQ for broiler diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":7984,"journal":{"name":"Antioxidants","volume":"13 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of an Antioxidant Compound and Ethoxyquin on Feed Oxidative Stability and on Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, and Intestinal Health in Starter Broiler Chickens.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Xiao, Xuyang Gao, Jianmin Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antiox13101229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Concerns over the safety of ethoxyquin (EQ) highlight the need for safer, more effective feed antioxidants. This study investigated a healthier antioxidant compound (AC) as a potential alternative to EQ in broilers. A total of 351 one-day-old Arbor Acres Plus male broilers were randomly assigned to three treatments for 21 days: control (CON), EQ group (200 g/ton EQ at 60% purity), and AC group (200 g/ton AC containing 18% butylated hydroxytoluene, 3% citric acid, and 1% tertiary butylhydroquinone). AC supplementation reduced the acid value, peroxide value, and malondialdehyde content in stored feed, decreased feed intake and the feed conversion ratio without affecting body weight gain, and enhanced antioxidant capacity (liver total antioxidant capacity and superoxide dismutase; intestinal catalase and glutathione peroxidase 7). It improved intestinal morphology and decreased barrier permeability (lower diamine oxidase and D-lactate), potentially by promoting ZO-1, Occludin, and Mucin2 expression. The AC also upregulated NF-κB p50 and its inhibitor (NF-κB p105), enhancing immune regulation. Additionally, the AC tended to increase beneficial gut microbiota, including <i>Lactobacillus</i>, and reduced <i>Bacteroides</i>, <i>Corprococcus</i>, and <i>Anaeroplasma</i>. Compared to EQ, the AC further enhanced feed oxidative stability, the feed conversion ratio, intestinal morphology and barrier functions, and inflammatory status, suggesting its potential as a superior alternative to EQ for broiler diets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antioxidants\",\"volume\":\"13 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11505240/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antioxidants\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13101229\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antioxidants","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox13101229","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对乙氧基喹(EQ)安全性的担忧凸显了对更安全、更有效的饲料抗氧化剂的需求。本研究调查了一种更健康的抗氧化剂化合物(AC),它有可能成为乙氧基喹在肉鸡中的替代品。总共 351 只一天龄的 Arbor Acres Plus 雄性肉鸡被随机分配到三种处理中,为期 21 天:对照组(CON)、EQ 组(200 克/吨纯度为 60% 的 EQ)和 AC 组(200 克/吨 AC,含 18% 的丁基羟基甲苯、3% 的柠檬酸和 1% 的特丁基对苯二酚)。添加 AC 可降低储存饲料中的酸值、过氧化值和丙二醛含量,减少采食量和饲料转化率,但不影响体重增加,并提高抗氧化能力(肝脏总抗氧化能力和超氧化物歧化酶;肠道过氧化氢酶和谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶 7)。它可能通过促进 ZO-1、Occludin 和 Mucin2 的表达,改善肠道形态并降低屏障渗透性(降低二胺氧化酶和 D-乳酸盐)。AC 还能上调 NF-κB p50 及其抑制剂(NF-κB p105),从而增强免疫调节功能。此外,AC 有增加有益肠道微生物群(包括乳酸杆菌)的趋势,并减少了乳酸杆菌、冠球菌和厌氧菌。与 EQ 相比,AC 进一步提高了饲料氧化稳定性、饲料转化率、肠道形态和屏障功能以及炎症状态,这表明它有可能成为肉鸡日粮中 EQ 的理想替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of an Antioxidant Compound and Ethoxyquin on Feed Oxidative Stability and on Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, and Intestinal Health in Starter Broiler Chickens.

Concerns over the safety of ethoxyquin (EQ) highlight the need for safer, more effective feed antioxidants. This study investigated a healthier antioxidant compound (AC) as a potential alternative to EQ in broilers. A total of 351 one-day-old Arbor Acres Plus male broilers were randomly assigned to three treatments for 21 days: control (CON), EQ group (200 g/ton EQ at 60% purity), and AC group (200 g/ton AC containing 18% butylated hydroxytoluene, 3% citric acid, and 1% tertiary butylhydroquinone). AC supplementation reduced the acid value, peroxide value, and malondialdehyde content in stored feed, decreased feed intake and the feed conversion ratio without affecting body weight gain, and enhanced antioxidant capacity (liver total antioxidant capacity and superoxide dismutase; intestinal catalase and glutathione peroxidase 7). It improved intestinal morphology and decreased barrier permeability (lower diamine oxidase and D-lactate), potentially by promoting ZO-1, Occludin, and Mucin2 expression. The AC also upregulated NF-κB p50 and its inhibitor (NF-κB p105), enhancing immune regulation. Additionally, the AC tended to increase beneficial gut microbiota, including Lactobacillus, and reduced Bacteroides, Corprococcus, and Anaeroplasma. Compared to EQ, the AC further enhanced feed oxidative stability, the feed conversion ratio, intestinal morphology and barrier functions, and inflammatory status, suggesting its potential as a superior alternative to EQ for broiler diets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Antioxidants
Antioxidants Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Physiology
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
2123
审稿时长
16.3 days
期刊介绍: Antioxidants (ISSN 2076-3921), provides an advanced forum for studies related to the science and technology of antioxidants. It publishes research papers, reviews and communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation or experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary electronic material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信