制定饮食失调症治疗候诊名单问题的解决方案。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Tracey D. Wade, Maya Jabs, Ella Keegan, Randall Long, Andrew McGregor, Mia Pellizzer, Madelaine de Valle, Marcela Radunz
{"title":"制定饮食失调症治疗候诊名单问题的解决方案。","authors":"Tracey D. Wade,&nbsp;Maya Jabs,&nbsp;Ella Keegan,&nbsp;Randall Long,&nbsp;Andrew McGregor,&nbsp;Mia Pellizzer,&nbsp;Madelaine de Valle,&nbsp;Marcela Radunz","doi":"10.1002/eat.24310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We examine the small amount of research to date that describes and/or evaluates waitlist interventions as a precursor to treatment for an eating disorder (ED) with the intent to provide recommendations for future research that can further test the efficacy and effectiveness of waitlist interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A review of published studies showed the standard of proof about the usefulness of waitlist interventions to be slight, with important gaps in our knowledge. One such gap was whether recovered people with lived experience could provide support to adults waiting for treatment. We briefly present new research evaluating this approach (<i>N</i> = 40), where people waiting for treatment were randomized to waitlist as usual or guided self-help with a trainee psychologist or a person with lived experience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eight published studies across 10 different programs are described; <i>N</i> = 7 addressed waitlists for children and adolescents, and only three were randomized controlled trials. Our new research did not support the involvement of people with lived experience at this stage of the treatment journey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The results suggest some promise of waitlist interventions. Parents waiting for family-based treatment were able to improve weight and nutritional health in their children and experienced improved self-efficacy with respect to managing the ED. Provision of a waitlist intervention to adults may increase the probability of later engagement in treatment. It is still not possible to conclude whether waitlist interventions improve outcomes over treatment compared to those who did not receive such an intervention. We make five recommendations for future research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":"57 12","pages":"2359-2369"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eat.24310","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Solutions to the Waitlist Problem for Eating Disorder Treatments\",\"authors\":\"Tracey D. Wade,&nbsp;Maya Jabs,&nbsp;Ella Keegan,&nbsp;Randall Long,&nbsp;Andrew McGregor,&nbsp;Mia Pellizzer,&nbsp;Madelaine de Valle,&nbsp;Marcela Radunz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>We examine the small amount of research to date that describes and/or evaluates waitlist interventions as a precursor to treatment for an eating disorder (ED) with the intent to provide recommendations for future research that can further test the efficacy and effectiveness of waitlist interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>A review of published studies showed the standard of proof about the usefulness of waitlist interventions to be slight, with important gaps in our knowledge. One such gap was whether recovered people with lived experience could provide support to adults waiting for treatment. We briefly present new research evaluating this approach (<i>N</i> = 40), where people waiting for treatment were randomized to waitlist as usual or guided self-help with a trainee psychologist or a person with lived experience.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eight published studies across 10 different programs are described; <i>N</i> = 7 addressed waitlists for children and adolescents, and only three were randomized controlled trials. Our new research did not support the involvement of people with lived experience at this stage of the treatment journey.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results suggest some promise of waitlist interventions. Parents waiting for family-based treatment were able to improve weight and nutritional health in their children and experienced improved self-efficacy with respect to managing the ED. Provision of a waitlist intervention to adults may increase the probability of later engagement in treatment. It is still not possible to conclude whether waitlist interventions improve outcomes over treatment compared to those who did not receive such an intervention. We make five recommendations for future research.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\"57 12\",\"pages\":\"2359-2369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eat.24310\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24310\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eat.24310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究了迄今为止描述和/或评估作为饮食失调症(ED)治疗前奏的候诊单干预的少量研究,旨在为今后的研究提供建议,以进一步检验候诊单干预的效力和有效性:方法:对已发表的研究进行回顾后发现,关于候补名单干预措施的有用性的证明标准很低,我们的知识还存在很大差距。其中一个缺口是,有生活经验的康复者能否为等待治疗的成年人提供支持。我们简要介绍了对这种方法进行评估的新研究(N = 40),在这些研究中,等待治疗的人被随机分配到等待名单照常进行治疗或在受训心理学家或有生活经验者的指导下进行自助治疗:结果:本文介绍了已发表的 8 项研究,涉及 10 个不同的项目;其中 7 项研究涉及儿童和青少年的候诊名单,只有 3 项研究是随机对照试验。我们的新研究并不支持有亲身经历者参与这一阶段的治疗:讨论:研究结果表明,候选名单干预措施具有一定的前景。等待家庭式治疗的家长能够改善其子女的体重和营养健康状况,并提高了管理 ED 的自我效能感。为成年人提供候补名单干预可能会增加他们日后参与治疗的可能性。与未接受干预的人相比,等待名单干预是否能改善治疗效果,目前还无法下结论。我们为今后的研究提出了五点建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Developing Solutions to the Waitlist Problem for Eating Disorder Treatments

Developing Solutions to the Waitlist Problem for Eating Disorder Treatments

Objective

We examine the small amount of research to date that describes and/or evaluates waitlist interventions as a precursor to treatment for an eating disorder (ED) with the intent to provide recommendations for future research that can further test the efficacy and effectiveness of waitlist interventions.

Method

A review of published studies showed the standard of proof about the usefulness of waitlist interventions to be slight, with important gaps in our knowledge. One such gap was whether recovered people with lived experience could provide support to adults waiting for treatment. We briefly present new research evaluating this approach (N = 40), where people waiting for treatment were randomized to waitlist as usual or guided self-help with a trainee psychologist or a person with lived experience.

Results

Eight published studies across 10 different programs are described; N = 7 addressed waitlists for children and adolescents, and only three were randomized controlled trials. Our new research did not support the involvement of people with lived experience at this stage of the treatment journey.

Discussion

The results suggest some promise of waitlist interventions. Parents waiting for family-based treatment were able to improve weight and nutritional health in their children and experienced improved self-efficacy with respect to managing the ED. Provision of a waitlist intervention to adults may increase the probability of later engagement in treatment. It is still not possible to conclude whether waitlist interventions improve outcomes over treatment compared to those who did not receive such an intervention. We make five recommendations for future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信